BBC: Notre-Dame cathedral: Firefighters tackle blaze in Paris


Recommended Posts

Xenon

OMG NO!

Where the hell is the fire department?!?!?!

Link to post
Share on other sites
+NJ Louch
2 minutes ago, Xenon said:

OMG NO!

Where the hell is the fire department?!?!?!

From the article:

 

"A major operation is under way to tackle the blaze"

"respect the boundaries set up by fire crews"

Heck, there's even a photo of them!

  • Facepalm 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Xenon

Wow. They were doing some work on the roof. I wonder if that was a cause. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
+Biscuits Brown

Im watching this on France 24 on youtube. Truly a devastating cultural loss. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
+Biscuits Brown

The France 24 Live channel has English anchors/reporters for those of us here in the States that do not speak French

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Brandon H

OH NO!!! I hope they can at least save some of it

 

looks horrible on the live streams :(

Link to post
Share on other sites
+primortal

Just heartbreaking :(

Link to post
Share on other sites
Xenon

They will rebuild it. Not all of the building was original. 

 

I wonder how much of the material inside did they save. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Brandon H
1 minute ago, Xenon said:

They will rebuild it. Not all of the building was original. 

 

I wonder how much of the material inside did they save. 

there's a lot of history and art in there that could potentially be lost though; that's the true loss IMO :(

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
menifred
Just now, Brandon H said:

there's a lot of history and art in there that could potentially be lost though; that's the true loss IMO :(

I agree.  The main roof was original (1,000 years old).

Link to post
Share on other sites
Jim K

Terrible....  :(

 

So much history just wiped out ... not just the structure but also the archaeological crypt  (which I'm sure had been extensively damaged)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Brandon H

firefighters are saying they may not be able to save it now :(

Link to post
Share on other sites
neufuse

I really hope they digitized everything they could in that place in the past to preserve stuff even after it's been lost... like all the paintings all the artifacts all cataloged and extensively photographed the interior... etc..

 

and it sounds like people doing the renovation on the spire caused this? heck just this past week they pulled down the 16 statues on the building to restore them

 

if you saw the time lapse of the webcam that was watching the cathedral, the fire started at the spire at least where you could see it externally

Link to post
Share on other sites
Xenon

Reports now saying that they saved a lot but not all of the art inside. They began to remove items as soon as the fire started. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
+warwagon

Why don't they fly over it with a tanker and just dump about 1,000 gallons of water on it?

  • Facepalm 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
+NJ Louch
2 minutes ago, warwagon said:

Why don't they fly over it with a tanker and just dump about 1,000 gallons of water on it?

Trump said similar on Twitter and much of the world facepalmed. I mean, you do understand why that’s not even close to an option and you’re kidding right?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
PGHammer
3 hours ago, Xenon said:

Wow. They were doing some work on the roof. I wonder if that was a cause. 

Likely - a similar fire (caused by roof repair) wrecked the Prince George's County, MD "Old Courthouse" a few years back.  This cathedral dates back to the thirteenth century (thus far older than even the oldest colony in North America).

Link to post
Share on other sites
+warwagon
2 minutes ago, Human.Online said:

Trump said similar on Twitter and much of the world facepalmed

why the facepalm? What's the alternative? Just let it burn to the ground?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Xenon
6 minutes ago, warwagon said:

Why don't they fly over it with a tanker and just dump about 1,000 gallons of water on it?

Two things.

 

1. Do they have any.

2. The damage that the falling fire retardant will cause. You are talking liquid being thrown at a good speed on to a weakened structure. They usually don't use water.

Link to post
Share on other sites
+warwagon
Just now, Xenon said:

Two things.

 

1. Do they have any.

2. The damage that the falling fire retardant will cause. They usually don't use water. 

Well, looks like they can't do much worse.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Brandon H
8 minutes ago, warwagon said:

Why don't they fly over it with a tanker and just dump about 1,000 gallons of water on it?

because of the crypt underneath they were saying on the above live stream Zag linked

Link to post
Share on other sites
Xenon
2 minutes ago, warwagon said:

Well, looks like they can't do much worse.

Actually there is priceless stained glass windows that could be broken, plus using that on a weakened structure might cause a structural collapse.

Link to post
Share on other sites
+NJ Louch
3 minutes ago, warwagon said:

why the facepalm? What's the alternative? Just let it burn to the ground?

Go do a little research about the building, it’s crypt, the reasons for the renovations, the contents within, the location, the water table in Paris and then answer your own question.

3 minutes ago, warwagon said:

Well, looks like they can't do much worse.

Historically important artefacts are being rescued as we speak! He’s to do when you’ve destroyed them with water!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.