Motherboard Recommendations


Recommended Posts

Newb    2

Hey!

I am planning on buying a new motherboard because my old mobo just goes to silicon heaven (dead). What can you recommend me for a budget of $100-$120 that i wont have a problem if I would upgrade my other parts in the future. I am new to buying motherboards and i dont know what to get.

 

My specs:

Ryzen 5 1400 3.2ghz

Gigabyte Ga-a320m-ds2 (my dead mobo)

Deepcool DE600 600watts

Deepcool Smarter (mATX case)

Gtx 1050 ti OC 4gb gddr5

 

I am also thinking if I should replace my Case as well, what do you guys think? Should i get an ATX or mATX?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Newb    2
13 minutes ago, Riva said:

I would go for an Asus for durability and an X470 for as much as forward compatibility as possible with the upcoming Ryzen 4th gen. Thats a 100$-200$ range

Thanks for the suggestion 🙂 I'll look that up

Link to post
Share on other sites
Jim K    16,031

Your "old" board isn't under warranty? This is a terrible time to be looking for a board (practically no stock, at least here in the U.S.). Depending on your budget and with your current specs...probably a nice cheap ASUS, ASrock (or whatever) A320 or B450 chipset board would do... especially if you intend on just keeping the same setup for a few years.

 

Just a terrible time to be looking at boards. So, your current choices may be significantly limited.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Newb    2
1 hour ago, Jim K said:

Your "old" board isn't under warranty? This is a terrible time to be looking for a board (practically no stock, at least here in the U.S.). Depending on your budget and with your current specs...probably a nice cheap ASUS, ASrock (or whatever) A320 or B450 chipset board would do... especially if you intend on just keeping the same setup for a few years.

 

Just a terrible time to be looking at boards. So, your current choices may be significantly limited.

Well umm I brought it to a technician this day to check and he said that my board is the culprit and advised me to get a board other than gigabyte and he specifically suggested an Asus board because of its durability ... Im not from U.S. and I'm a budget gamer. I'll be keeping my setup for a few years depending on how long my components can last. I can't upgrade my setup even if I wanted to because of a very tight budget. Thanks for the suggestions, I'll keep that in mind 🙂

Link to post
Share on other sites
Brandon H    3,993
10 minutes ago, NotsoTechy said:

Well umm I brought it to a technician this day to check and he said that my board is the culprit and advised me to get a board other than gigabyte and he specifically suggested an Asus board because of its durability ... Im not from U.S. and I'm a budget gamer. I'll be keeping my setup for a few years depending on how long my components can last. I can't upgrade my setup even if I wanted to because of a very tight budget. Thanks for the suggestions, I'll keep that in mind 🙂

If you want to get away from Gigabyte then yeah Asus is one of the best out there but if you want to save that extra money, depending on when you bought that mobo and if you still have proof of purchase then you should be able to contact Gigabyte to see if they'll honor the warranty and provide a free replacement.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Mindovermaster    3,904

Gigabyte is quite OK, as long as you don't go with the cheapest.

 

ASUS and ASRock are amoungst the top two in motherboards. ASRock used to be a budget company. But they have really shined in the last few years.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Newb    2
11 minutes ago, Brandon H said:

If you want to get away from Gigabyte then yeah Asus is one of the best out there but if you want to save that extra money, depending on when you bought that mobo and if you still have proof of purchase then you should be able to contact Gigabyte to see if they'll honor the warranty and provide a free replacement.

Thanks for the suggestion, but I've decided to replace it for a better one.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Newb    2
3 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

Gigabyte is quite OK, as long as you don't go with the cheapest.

 

ASUS and ASRock are amoungst the top two in motherboards. ASRock used to be a budget company. But they have really shined in the last few years.

For a micro atx board, which of these two is better?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Mindovermaster    3,904
4 minutes ago, NotsoTechy said:

For a micro atx board, which of these two is better?

It totally depends on what you want. As with any motherboard. Tell us what you do with it, and we can suggest. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Newb    2
1 minute ago, Mindovermaster said:

It totally depends on what you want. As with any motherboard. Tell us what you do with it, and we can suggest. :)

I am using it for editing and gaming most likely.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Steven P.    17,505
6 minutes ago, NotsoTechy said:

I am using it for editing and gaming most likely.

Think if you also want Wi-Fi. Mine is the Aorus Z390 Pro Wi-fi (Intel) I can make my computer a hotspot for mobile devices etc, but if you will never use it, don't get it 😛 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Brandon H    3,993

ASRock HAS come a long way but I still personally trust Asus more

 

for true decision making though I'd recommend you pick out a few boards in your price range on Amazon or NewEgg and compare the reviews. Both companies will have diamonds and turds so seeing reviews from actual owners helps a million in decision making for computer parts 🙂

Link to post
Share on other sites
Newb    2
3 minutes ago, Steven P. said:

Think if you also want Wi-Fi. Mine is the Aorus Z390 Pro Wi-fi (Intel) I can make my computer a hotspot for mobile devices etc, but if you will never use it, don't get it 😛 

I've got a ryzen cpu, that's a good suggestion but I can't afford to buy something like that at the moment.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Newb    2
7 minutes ago, Brandon H said:

ASRock HAS come a long way but I still personally trust Asus more

I'm thinking of getting an Asus board.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Steven P.    17,505
20 minutes ago, NotsoTechy said:

I've got a ryzen cpu, that's a good suggestion but I can't afford to buy something like that at the moment.

Asus motherboard come with and without Wifi, my only suggestion was to think about if you need that feature or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Newb    2
6 hours ago, Steven P. said:

Asus motherboard come with and without Wifi, my only suggestion was to think about if you need that feature or not.

Nope, thanks for the replies, should i consider MSI boards? They have midrange b450m boards

Link to post
Share on other sites
Mindovermaster    3,904
20 minutes ago, NotsoTechy said:

Nope, thanks for the replies, should i consider MSI boards? They have midrange b450m boards

What is your price range?

 

Don't start me with MSI... It's just me, but ~15 years ago I RMA'd a motherboard back to them 3 times. After that, I hated them. Others may have more insight to MSI.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Newb    2
5 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

What is your price range?

 

Don't start me with MSI... It's just me, but ~15 years ago I RMA'd a motherboard back to them 3 times. After that, I hated them. Others may have more insight to MSI.

Well I've got $100 - $140 range, well that's an awful experience. Hmmmm

Link to post
Share on other sites
Circaflex    3,644
21 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

What is your price range?

 

Don't start me with MSI... It's just me, but ~15 years ago I RMA'd a motherboard back to them 3 times. After that, I hated them. Others may have more insight to MSI.

A lot changed in 15 years. ASRock used to be terrible, now they are good, ASUS used to be good, now they are terrible, etc etc.

 

MSI and Gigabyte are the two main recommended manufacturers for AMD systems these days.

Link to post
Share on other sites
goretsky    1,218

Hello,

 

On a different site, I have seen many complaints about ASRock's line of AMD motherboards at the value end of the spectrum (e.g., their least expensive models).  I have around five Intel-based ASRock systems and have not had any issues with them, but these are mostly motherboards from their server group, and not their consumer division.

 

MSI's AMD-based boards seem to get recommended a lot because some of their models have the ability to update the BIOS (UEFI) firmware without a CPU installed.  This is important, because some AMD-based motherboards didn't work with some AMD CPUs without first upgrading their BIOS.  This forced AMD to introduce a "processor loan program" so that people could get their motherboard updated to work with the CPU they bought.

 

ASUS' AMD-based boards seem to have a good reputation, but I am unsure if they have the same BIOS update feature as MSI's.  They also tend to be a little more expensive.

 

I do not have any AMD-based systems myself right now, but am currently using an ASUS workstation motherboard in my primary desktop.  The one before that had an ASRock motherboard.

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Mindovermaster    3,904
7 minutes ago, Circaflex said:

A lot changed in 15 years. ASRock used to be terrible, now they are good, ASUS used to be good, now they are terrible, etc etc.

 

MSI and Gigabyte are the two main recommended manufacturers for AMD systems these days.

ASUS? You're kidding, right? ASUS isn't terrible. I do believe however they slunked a little, but they are still good. Particularly their ROG boards.

 

ASRock used to be just a budget company, not terrible. But yes, I do believe they have gotten 110% better than in the old days.

 

I understand MSI can be better after 15 years, BUT, that is the way I feel towards them. If you like them, great.

Link to post
Share on other sites
adrynalyne    14,227
6 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

ASUS? You're kidding, right? ASUS isn't terrible. I do believe however they slunked a little, but they are still good. Particularly their ROG boards.

 

ASRock used to be just a budget company, not terrible. But yes, I do believe they have gotten 110% better than in the old days.

 

I understand MSI can be better after 15 years, BUT, that is the way I feel towards them. If you like them, great.

I won’t buy an ASUS board...

Link to post
Share on other sites
Mindovermaster    3,904
Posted (edited)
40 minutes ago, adrynalyne said:

I won’t buy an ASUS board...

TBH, I haven't bought an ASUS boards since the first i5's came out... But, I wouldn't rulel them out.

 

Same as MSI for me. We all have different feelings... ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Circaflex    3,644
2 hours ago, Mindovermaster said:

ASUS? You're kidding, right? ASUS isn't terrible. I do believe however they slunked a little, but they are still good. Particularly their ROG boards.

 

ASRock used to be just a budget company, not terrible. But yes, I do believe they have gotten 110% better than in the old days.

 

I understand MSI can be better after 15 years, BUT, that is the way I feel towards them. If you like them, great.

Depends on your use-case, but if your into high overclocks id ask you to venture off to a few other forums to see the complaints folks have. ASUS quality has gone down, as has their BIOS.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Newb    2

Thanks for the replies guys, much appreciated 🙂

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By kecmen
      Hi,

      I have Aorus Master X570 with Ryzen 9 3950X and separate graphics card (ASROCK Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 8G in PCIe 4 16x slot)
      I have installed 4x 32GB DDR4 corsair modules (VENGEANCE RGB PRO 64GB (2 x 32GB) DDR4 DRAM 3000MHz C15 Memory Kit) to it which makes 128 GB in total.
      I have the latest BIOS (F11).

      However I'm not able to use all 128 GB. My system only has ~126GB available, more than 2GB are reserved.

      Is there some setting in BIOS i need to change to have the full capacity or RAM available? Is this somehow pre-allocated for some internal graphics (some ryzen do have internal GPU).

      I'm using Linux (Kubuntu 20.04), here are the outputs from some relevant commands:


      root:~# dmesg | grep emory:
      [ 0.000000] PM: Registered nosave memory: [mem 0x00000000-0x00000fff]
      [ 0.000000] PM: Registered nosave memory: [mem 0x000a0000-0x000fffff]
      [ 0.000000] PM: Registered nosave memory: [mem 0x09e02000-0x09ffffff]
      [ 0.000000] PM: Registered nosave memory: [mem 0x0a200000-0x0a20bfff]
      [ 0.000000] PM: Registered nosave memory: [mem 0xd733b000-0xd733bfff]
      [ 0.000000] PM: Registered nosave memory: [mem 0xd7353000-0xd7353fff]
      [ 0.000000] PM: Registered nosave memory: [mem 0xd7354000-0xd7354fff]
      [ 0.000000] PM: Registered nosave memory: [mem 0xd7361000-0xd7361fff]
      [ 0.000000] PM: Registered nosave memory: [mem 0xd73a8000-0xd73a8fff]
      [ 0.000000] PM: Registered nosave memory: [mem 0xd73b9000-0xd73b9fff]
      [ 0.000000] PM: Registered nosave memory: [mem 0xd7b73000-0xd7bc9fff]
      [ 0.000000] PM: Registered nosave memory: [mem 0xda343000-0xda343fff]
      [ 0.000000] PM: Registered nosave memory: [mem 0xdb75d000-0xdb993fff]
      [ 0.000000] PM: Registered nosave memory: [mem 0xdbb1c000-0xdbf49fff]
      [ 0.000000] PM: Registered nosave memory: [mem 0xdbf4a000-0xdcc08fff]
      [ 0.000000] PM: Registered nosave memory: [mem 0xdf000000-0xdfffffff]
      [ 0.000000] PM: Registered nosave memory: [mem 0xe0000000-0xf7ffffff]
      [ 0.000000] PM: Registered nosave memory: [mem 0xf8000000-0xfbffffff]
      [ 0.000000] PM: Registered nosave memory: [mem 0xfc000000-0xfcffffff]
      [ 0.000000] PM: Registered nosave memory: [mem 0xfd000000-0xffffffff]
      [ 0.000000] Memory: 131679596K/134165956K available (14339K kernel code, 2397K rwdata, 4948K rodata, 2712K init, 4992K bss, 2486360K reserved, 0K cma-reserved)
      [ 0.004807] Freeing SMP alternatives memory: 40K
      [ 1.915340] Freeing initrd memory: 78264K
      [ 1.971224] Freeing unused decrypted memory: 2040K
      [ 1.971517] Freeing unused kernel image memory: 2712K
      [ 1.996566] Freeing unused kernel image memory: 2008K
      [ 1.996767] Freeing unused kernel image memory: 1196K
      [ 2.135665] [TTM] Zone kernel: Available graphics memory: 65968864 KiB
      [ 2.135665] [TTM] Zone dma32: Available graphics memory: 2097152 KiB


      root:~# free
      total used free shared buff/cache available
      Mem: 131937728 18223112 80158388 543632 33556228 111930044
      Swap: 0 0 0


      root:~# cat /proc/meminfo
      MemTotal: 131937728 kB
      MemFree: 80066760 kB
      MemAvailable: 111855496 kB
      Buffers: 598632 kB
      Cached: 32510864 kB
      SwapCached: 0 kB
      Active: 19166560 kB
      Inactive: 30586972 kB
      Active(anon): 16643144 kB
      Inactive(anon): 547712 kB
      Active(file): 2523416 kB
      Inactive(file): 30039260 kB
      Unevictable: 0 kB
      Mlocked: 0 kB
      SwapTotal: 0 kB
      SwapFree: 0 kB
      Dirty: 328 kB
      Writeback: 0 kB
      AnonPages: 16644420 kB
      Mapped: 849300 kB
      Shmem: 552780 kB
      KReclaimable: 472920 kB
      Slab: 783896 kB
      SReclaimable: 472920 kB
      SUnreclaim: 310976 kB
      KernelStack: 36304 kB
      PageTables: 89220 kB
      NFS_Unstable: 0 kB
      Bounce: 0 kB
      WritebackTmp: 0 kB
      CommitLimit: 65968864 kB
      Committed_AS: 130765020 kB
      VmallocTotal: 34359738367 kB
      VmallocUsed: 58688 kB
      VmallocChunk: 0 kB
      Percpu: 33536 kB
      HardwareCorrupted: 0 kB
      AnonHugePages: 0 kB
      ShmemHugePages: 0 kB
      ShmemPmdMapped: 0 kB
      FileHugePages: 0 kB
      FilePmdMapped: 0 kB
      CmaTotal: 0 kB
      CmaFree: 0 kB
      HugePages_Total: 0
      HugePages_Free: 0
      HugePages_Rsvd: 0
      HugePages_Surp: 0
      Hugepagesize: 2048 kB
      Hugetlb: 0 kB
      DirectMap4k: 1613640 kB
      DirectMap2M: 17209344 kB
      DirectMap1G: 116391936 kB


      I executed memtest couple of times and the modules seems to be working fine. Also lshw shows correct parameters for them.

      My motherbord: https://www.gigabyte.com/Motherboard/X570-AORUS-MASTER-rev-1x/support#support-dl-bios
      My ram: https://www.corsair.com/us/en/Categories/Products/Memory/Vengeance-PRO-RGB-Black/p/CMW64GX4M2C3000C15
    • By hellowalkman
      Lenovo motherboards soon? Legion branded motherboard spotted online
      by Sayan Sen

      A couple of motherboard images bearing the 'Legion' logo - the gaming brand of Lenovo - were spotted online by Weibo user 'WolStame'.

      One of these is a comparison between the newer Blade 7000 motherboard with its predecessor highlighting the upgrades, while the other image is a close-up of the new model showcasing the Legion brand and the robust build of the region around the CPU socket.





      The board appears to be equipped with most modern features expected of a decent mid-high-end motherboard nowadays. These include:

      Four memory DIMM slots, 8+2 power delivery system, Heatsinks covering the VRMs, PCH and PCIe regions. 3x M.2 slots (Two for SSD, One for Network Card), 5.1 Channel Audio Output. USB-C interface
      For those unaware, Lenovo sells pre-built gaming towers with the 'Blade' branding and the company, in fact, recently announced an update to its 7000 series with Intel Coffee Lake CPUs, the Intel Core i7-9700F to be precise. Hence, it's very likely that the firm was showing off the capabilities of its new Blade 7000 series motherboards compared to its previous offering. Though, the possibility of a standalone launch certainly remains as these look quite well-made and could surely appeal to most gamers.

      Regardless, it's still interesting to learn the differences that Lenovo has made under the hood in the new Blade 7000 gaming tower.

      Source and images: WolStame(Weibo)

    • By cacoe
      I've set fast boot to be enabled, I've set the post screen to display for zero seconds.... it still shows for 3-5 seconds, my old mobo would almost instantaniously skip it (it would flash up for maybe 0.5s so you could still actually enter bios if required).
       
      Any ideas on this?
       
      Thanks.
    • By hellowalkman
      Gigabyte 400-series Motherboards for Intel Comet Lake-S spotted at EEC
      by Sayan Sen

      In the last couple of years, competition for Intel in the desktop CPU space has been growing thanks to a resurgent AMD. The latter has adopted a tenacious strategy of adding more cores, which has also forced Intel to do the same, and at a pace much faster than the Santa Clara-headquartered firm was previously used to.

      To combat the newfound competition, Intel is gearing up to refresh its desktop CPU and motherboard offerings with Comet Lake-S CPUs and 400-series chipset motherboards. The latter is now confirmed thanks to the listings of Gigabyte's upcoming models spotted in the Eurasian Economic Commission (EEC)'s database.

      From the leak, it appears that Intel has slightly altered the naming scheme of the upcoming chipset variants. The _70 series which was previously prefixed by Z- is now led by the H- prefix. There is also the appearance of a new "Q-" prefix chipset model.

      The names of the leaked models have been summarized below:

      GIGABYTE 400 Series Motherboard models Z490 H470/Q470 B460 H410 Z490 Aorus Elite H470M DS3H B460M Aorus Pro H410M HD3 Z490 Gaming X H470M D3H B460M Gaming HD H410M H Z490M Gaming X H470 HD3 B460M Power H410M D2VX SI Z490M DS3H Q470M D3H B460M DS3H H410M DS2V Z490 D B460M D3H H410M DS2 Z490 UD B460M D3P H410M S2 B460M D3V H410M S2H B460 HD3 H410M S2P B460M D2VX SI H410M S2V B460M D2V H410M A H410 D3 H410N Pricing and availability of these are unknown at this point. It is rumored that the Comet Lake-S CPUs is launching sometime in Q1 2020 which leads us to believe that the motherboards should also come out around the same time frame.


      Source: Videocardz| Image: Twitter

    • By german77
      Last night a thunderstorm hit very close to my home while I was using the computer. The light went off for a minute.  After the thunderstorm I decided to turn the computer again. Everything booted fine with no errors. But the keyboard, mouse, and a xbox controller where dead with no signs of working even in bios. Naturally I thought that something should have failed. I connected the keyboard to another computer and it worked fine.
       
      My computer monitor has usb ports. I connected the keyboard and mouse. And for my surprise they do work, checked for configuration but everything looks fine in the software side. Did some test and found that every USB port on my computer do transmit data. But lack of 5v power. I checked every power pin on the power supply and everything is good. A visual inspection show no burn, smoke, inflated, or blown up components.
       
       Ethernet ports and sound works fine. I can't test other non USB 5v ports, because I don't have the correct cable or device. I don't care about those because I never use them.
       
      I suppose that the USB power has a fuse or an internal regulator that could have failed. Can anyone had this kind of problem before. I got the tools to repair the motherboard. But want to know others opinions before messing up with the hardware.