Recommended Posts

Hello,?

?

Thank you for writing to MSN Messenger.?

?

You mentioned some suggestions and recommendations about MSN Messenger. We

appreciate your feedback. Unfortunately, that feature is not currently available

with MSN Messenger. We forwarded your suggestion to the product team that

carefully reviews these suggestions and considers them for future releases.

If you have any inquiries or more suggestions, feel free to write back. We'll be

happy to hear from you again.

For additional online help, please go to:??

http://messenger.msn.com/Help/ 

??

Sincerely,??

??

Vanessa??

MSN Messenger Support

don't u just fe:ermm: love? :ermm:

I work in a software development company, and I can tell you that feedback like that DOES get read. But just because you suggest something doesn't mean it's going to happen.

You can't begin to conceive of the internal politics involved in something like making a change to a popular / important system. It may not seem like much to you as an end-user, but it's monumental. It's not just a case of Microsoft reading your suggestion and then clicking its heels three times, it's far more difficult than that. There's a reason Unsanity or Objective Development can bring out radical new features in days, whereas Microsoft takes years.

And that's only based on my experiences here. I can only imagine how much greater it is in a massive company like Microsoft.

How do you know that Microsoft is working the same way as your company in handling ideas of their customers. Giving "automated" and inpersonal messages back isn't my idea of reading feedback carefully....

And I (!)think(!) the big difference is between Microsoft and your software company is that Microsoft owns the whole f*cking software branche and doesn't really have to listen to the people because they'll make their profit each year anyway. That especially applies to the Mac users because they're only a small part of Microsoft's customers.:ninja:

Then your idea of reading feedback carefully bears only a casual resemblance to reality :)

What does reading feedback have to do with writing you a personal letter? Ever tried submitting feedback to Apple on their website? Do they give you a personal response? Of course not, they tell you exactly what I just told you. They don't have time to sit there writing out letters one by one to everyone who dreams up an idea.

That has nothing to do with whether or not someone reads your feedback and considers it. My point is that if the people who read and consider it had to write everyone back about every suggestion, they'd never get a CHANCE to actually consider any of it. There are only so many hours in the day.

These things get read. But reading them has no bearing on responding to you, and they have far better things to do than that (such as reading the next guy's suggestion).

How do you know that Microsoft is working the same way as your company in handling ideas of their customers. Giving "automated" and inpersonal messages back isn't my idea of reading feedback carefully....

And I (!)think(!) the big difference is between Microsoft and your software company is that Microsoft owns the whole f*cking software branche and doesn't really have to listen to the people because they'll make their profit each year anyway. That especially applies to the Mac users because they're only a small part of Microsoft's customers.:ninja:

Well, I submitted feedback and i did get a personal reply from their customer service guy or representative

I have so far submitted 2 diferent feedback reports to them (MSN Messenger team), and have received e-mails from them.... Here they are, along with the response from the Microsoft people...

This reply was sent to me on March 30:

Hello,

Thank you for writing to MSN Messenger.

I understand that you want to be able to have videoconference capabilities in MSN Messenger for Mac.

I think this is a good idea and will greatly improve our service. I forwarded your suggestion to the product team which carefully reviews suggestions for future releases.

Also, I would like to apologize for the delay in answering your email as you have expected.

Let me know if you have other inquiries. I appreciate your support and patience.

For additional online help, please go to:

http://messenger.msn.com/Help/

Sincerely,

Sarah

MSN Messenger Support

--- Original Message ---

From: icaito@

To: [email protected]

Sent: Sun Mar 28 22:29:31 PST 2004

Subject: SUGGESTION: Future4: Feature

Description : I just want to express to you guys what I have heard from a few thousand others. Please, DO add the video conference capabilities to the upcoming version of MSN Messenger for Mac.

I have seen the new beta version in action, and truth is I am very short to completely shocked. I sincerely expect more of you guys.

Thanks for your kind attention.

And here is the next reply, received the first of April:

Hello Ricardo,

Thank you for your reply.

We apologize for the delay in response. We are eager to assist you with your concern.

I appreciate you providing us with further suggestions which will help us improve our service to all Messenger user for Mac.

The feature to scroll down with the stored e-mail address you mentioned is a built in design of Windows XP versions. This function not only apply to MSN Messenger program but other programs which is using a Passport service. This stored e-mail addresses are locally stored on a computer which can also be deleted. I have take note of all the feature request you have included in your e-mail and forward this again to our product development team.

I appreciate your understanding and continuous support.

Please write back to us if you have other inquiries.

For additional online help, please go to:

http://messenger.msn.com/Mac/FAQ.aspx?client=2

Sincerely,

Angelo

MSN Messenger Support

--- Original Message ---

From: icaito@

To: [email protected]

Sent: Tue Mar 30 19:50:47 PST 2004

Subject: Re: CST152759129ID - SUGGESTION: Future4: Feature

Thank you for your kind (and timely) response, Sarah.

I really understand that you guys have very busy schedules and appreciate

deeply that you take time a minute to respond to my concerns.

As I keep tweaking the beta version of MSN Messenger:Mac I have to tell you

I find very interesting that, up to this point, the program has not

"crashed" on me once (which is a problem I used to have on the old version,

3.5), so BIG kudos on that one.

However so, I think there are still a couple other things that I've seen in

the latest Windows version that should be brought onboard on the Mac, such

as:

-A scroll-down login (for different user names)... I am not completely sure

whether that is a Windows XP feature, but it would be totally cool to have

it on MSN for Mac 4.

-The side window for user profile (picture).

-Finally, what are the possibilities of (sometime in the near future) have

interface between MSN Messenger and iChat? I understand this is a very

complicated issue, and encompasses the agreement of both parties. Also, on

the same note, if you guys DO add VTC capabilities to your new version,

please, PLEASE, make sure it works with iSight, that would be the greatest

addition yet.

I will leave it at that. Don't want to bother you guys too much.

Again thanks a million for your kind attention. Have a great day.

Ricardo.

So I do guess it is worth a try... also, I think the more we tell them about the features we want to see, the better a chance we will have of getting them on the next MSN Messenger version (v4).

What do you all think?

Could you describe "the feature to scroll down with the stored e-mail address" a little more in depth please? I've been playing with the addressbook API so this kind of interests me.

I'm writing using Cocoa where as I'm reasonably sure messenger is using carbon (which I hardly know at all) like the rest of the office suite, but writing this sounds like the kind of thing that makes cocoa such an nice API so I'd like to spend a few hours and try to figure it out.

DOSE, you got my point exactly... I was talking about the dropdown/scrolldown option where email addresses are "stored" and which the user (me/you/etc) would use when logging in to MSN Messenger on Windows XP... However, as the person from the MSN team responded, such feature is available thru XP only, since it is one of the embedded software designs of XP...

however, as the evn show was saying..

I've been playing with the addressbook API so this kind of interests me.

I'm writing using Cocoa where as I'm reasonably sure messenger is using carbon (which I hardly know at all) like the rest of the office suite, but writing this sounds like the kind of thing that makes cocoa such an nice API so I'd like to spend a few hours and try to figure it out.

i think that runnning the application on cocoa might help come up with a design that might trick the program (MSN v4) into doing this... why don't you contact the production team and explain your idea... sounds absolutely genious to me :woot:

  • 4 months later...
You can't begin to conceive of the internal politics involved in something like making a change to a popular / important system. It may not seem like much to you as an end-user, but it's monumental. It's not just a case of Microsoft reading your suggestion and then clicking its heels three times, it's far more difficult than that. There's a reason Unsanity or Objective Development can bring out radical new features in days, whereas Microsoft takes years.

..the thing is.. video is super-easy to code into an OS X program.. using any compressor you want. Most Mac users I know refuse to install Windows Media Player, so if the feature does make it to the Mac version of MSN Messenger, you just know all of them won't be able to use it without installing the dreaded WMP and all the heartache (crappy codecs that try to take over browsers, etc.) that comes with it.

There's no way MS will let us use any codec but theirs.

The 'internal politics' of adding video to the Mac version are not really an issue when the program already has these features, it's just to keep it for a 'preferred' platform.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Glary Utilities 6.43.0.47 by Razvan Serea Glary Utilities offers numerous powerful and easy-to-use system tools and utilities to fix, speed up, maintain and protect your PC. Glary Utilities allow you to clean common system junk files, as well as invalid registry entries and Internet traces. You can manage and delete browser add-ons, analyze disk space usage and find duplicate files. You can also view and manage installed shell extensions, encrypt your files from unauthorized access and use, split large files into smaller manageable files and then rejoin them. Furthermore, Glary Utilities includes the options to find, fix, or remove broken Windows shortcuts, manage the programs that start at Windows startup and uninstall software. All Glary Utilities tools can be accessed through an eye-pleasing and totally simplistic interface. Glary Utilities 6.43.0.47 changelog: Optimized Memory Defrager: Optimized the clipboard cleaning algorithm, increasing speed by 5%. Optimized Wipe Free Space: Optimized the free space wiping algorithm, increasing speed by 8%. Minor GUI improvements. Minor bug fixes. Download: Glary Utilities 6.43.0.47 | 27.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Portable Glary Utilities | 32.3 MB View: Glary Utilities Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • "Of course the easiest solution is to switch to uBlock Origin Lite if you want to remain on Chrome, as it is MV3-based, but from our experience, uBO Lite does not seem to be as good as the original non-Lite version" In my experience uBlock Origin Lite does the job for normal everday home users. When they kill that we get to watch Firefox and Brave get a boost in user market share.
    • Block by DNS ad blocker! I dare you! I will even layer unlock Origin, on top of my internal DNS, if I need to and I don’t even block ads today (I really should but this type of behavior makes me angry). I suppose I could also just be lazy, and add the flags myself, back to each release (it wouldn’t be that difficult).
    • Wonder what MPs have ties to these privacy/verification/data harvesting companies that are going to step in this time. Last time under the Tories half the cabinet had fingers in the pies, heck even the PM and his wife at the time was working for silicon valley, probably made a fortune.
    • Google Chrome is killing all uBlock Origin bypasses, Microsoft Edge, Opera to follow by Sayan Sen For a while now the transition away from Manifest V2 (MV2) to MV3 has been on-going and it looks like it is entering its final phase of deprecation, at least, in the case of Google Chrome. A recent discussion thread in the w3c WebExtensions Community Group GitHub repo has highlighted how the latest and upcoming versions of the most popular browser are expected to be its final releases with support for MV2 extensions. Chromium contributor Andrey Bershanskiy shared details about recent Chromium changes and according to comments from Google engineer Devlin Cronin, Chrome has now started removing the flags that previously controlled MV2 availability. kExtensionManifestV2Disabled, the Chromium feature flag that allowed controlled disabling of MV2 add-ons, is now completely removed, which means you will likely no longer find uBlock Origin in your browser extensions list. He wrote: "The kExtensionManifestV2Disabled feature has been default-enabled for over a year. Remove the feature and the effectively-dead code. ... Any tests that relied on being in the "warning" phase (i.e., with the kExtensionManifestV2Disabled) for their sole behavior testing are removed, since this stage is no longer reachable." Cronin further explained why MV2 extensions are no longer allowed in supported Chrome versions as maintaining the associated functionality indefinitely is no longer possible. He cited growing technical difficulties and implementation complexities as well as security concerns. He wrote: "MV2 extensions are no longer allowed in any supported version of Chrome, and we are removing support for them and the associated functionality. We won't be able to provide / maintain this functionality indefinitely due to the complexity and tech debt, as well as the security risks it entails (we've actually found a number of bugs that are specific to MV2 lately). Of course, other browsers can continue supporting these if they so desire. Unfortunately, we won't be putting code behind a compilation flag ... We won't be removing all the MV2 code wholesale right away, so many of these things will continue working for awhile (but they will go away eventually, and some may go away sooner than others)." What this essentially means is that the tricks and bypasses that were used to keep MV2 extensions like uBlock Origin and others alive will not work any more on Chrome, or at least not for very long. For example the Windows Registry mod that could extend MV2 availability will cease to function after Chromium version 151. Here is a rundown of the changes coming in the final such releases of Chromium releases: Chromium 150 lost ExtensionManifestV2Disabled option Chromium 151 will loose ExtensionManifestV2Unsupported option Chromium 151 will loose ExtensionManifestV2Availability option Chromium 151 will likely loose AllowLegacyMV2Extensions option Other Chromium-based browsers like Opera and Microsoft Edge could soon follow suit too. Although it is not specified, Edge began disabling uBlock Origin back in February, and Opera could also stop the functioning of MV2 add-ons, even though it had committed to support MV2 for longer in October 2024. uBlock Origin developer Raymond Hill (gorhill) apparently stated the following: "For Opera I did submit 1.70.0 rather late, but this was weeks ago. A while ago I received an email from Opera that they plan to abandon MV2-based extension so maybe they are no longer allocating resources for reviewing such extensions." The email which developers like Gorhill mentions was received from Opera last year. Here is what it seemingly said: Hence for now the only Chromium browser that seems to be on-board fully with MV2 support is Brave, and perhaps Vivaldi as well. Meanwhile if you want to ditch Chromium browsers entirely then Mozilla Firefox is an excellent alternative as MV3 and MV2 are both supported. Of course the easiest solution is to switch to uBlock Origin Lite if you want to remain on Chrome, as it is MV3-based, but from our experience, uBO Lite does not seem to be as good as the original non-Lite version. Source: w3C (GitHub repo) As an online publication, Neowin too relies on ads for operating costs and, if you use an ad blocker, we'd appreciate being whitelisted. In addition, we have an ad-free subscription for $28 a year, which is another way to show support!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      skylerssviv earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      mobmobiles earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      217
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      92
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      82
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!