QuarterSwede Posted April 15, 2004 Share Posted April 15, 2004 Site loads at a medium pace for me but I still only get image placeholders instead of the actual images. Thanks for working on getting this problem fixed. You guys rule! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wannes Posted April 15, 2004 Share Posted April 15, 2004 still running surprisingly fast for me. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redmak Administrators Posted April 15, 2004 Administrators Share Posted April 15, 2004 Site loads at a medium pace for me but I still only get image placeholders instead of the actual images. Thanks for working on getting this problem fixed. You guys rule! This is because the images are accessed through port 81. A firewall is probably blocking port 81 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Japlabot Posted April 15, 2004 Share Posted April 15, 2004 This is because the images are accessed through port 81. A firewall is probably blocking port 81 um... why? A lot of us (like myself) don't have access to port 81, what's wrong with port 80 if you've got it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wannes Posted April 15, 2004 Share Posted April 15, 2004 i dont have a firewall anymore, i am pleased with my linksys firewall and damn neowin is running even faster... i dont have time to blink cause the page is there to fast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redmak Administrators Posted April 15, 2004 Administrators Share Posted April 15, 2004 um... why? A lot of us (like myself) don't have access to port 81, what's wrong with port 80 if you've got it? Because the normal pages are served by Apache on port 80 and the images by another http server. They can't both run on port 80. I'll try to figure something out. I just wanted to test if this increases speed and lowers the load, and it does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wannes Posted April 15, 2004 Share Posted April 15, 2004 its not that hard to open port 81. what software are you using? tell me and ill get you the instructions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calidude Posted April 15, 2004 Share Posted April 15, 2004 You can't really beat [ Script Execution time: 0.0818 ] [ 12 queries used ] [ GZIP Enabled ] [ Server Load: 0.28 ] Thanks for your hard work admins and staff! :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+BudMan MVC Posted April 15, 2004 MVC Share Posted April 15, 2004 Because the normal pages are served by Apache on port 80 and the images by another http server. They can't both run on port 80.I'll try to figure something out. I just wanted to test if this increases speed and lowers the load, and it does. they could if they were on different ip addresses - why not put all the images on say images.neowin.net (different IP, same machine). This would allow people that are behind corp firewalls that block most ports besides, 80, 433, etc... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iain Posted April 15, 2004 Share Posted April 15, 2004 I get the site just refusing to load a lot of the time due to heavy server load. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Storm Posted April 15, 2004 Share Posted April 15, 2004 I would imagine it is a bit of a problem using port 81, As a lot of firewalls that people cannot access will block this. You could put it on another standard port like 21 or something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted April 16, 2004 Share Posted April 16, 2004 Arrghh - My corporate firewall blocks port 81 becuase of the Bagle virus. Why don't you use port 8080? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redmak Administrators Posted April 16, 2004 Administrators Share Posted April 16, 2004 If 8080 is a better port I will switch to that asap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wannes Posted April 16, 2004 Share Posted April 16, 2004 what a service. wether it being a better port i don't know, but if the bagle virus enters via port 80 i wouldnt like to have it open. :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted April 16, 2004 Share Posted April 16, 2004 My network guys here say 8080 is fine :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wannes Posted April 16, 2004 Share Posted April 16, 2004 nice. we'll see if it makes a difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Storm Posted April 16, 2004 Share Posted April 16, 2004 ,Apr 16 2004, 09:46] what a service. wether it being a better port i don't know, but if the bagle virus enters via port 80 i wouldnt like to have it open. :( No. Beagle uses port 81 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wannes Posted April 16, 2004 Share Posted April 16, 2004 yea sorry small typo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted April 16, 2004 Share Posted April 16, 2004 So whats the news? Is the port changing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivand Posted April 16, 2004 Share Posted April 16, 2004 I still having some problems with data.neowin.net, i keeps telling me that the document contains no data... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oblivion Posted April 22, 2004 Share Posted April 22, 2004 Site Response Time Has Been Awesome For 4 Days Now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts