Poulet Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 :p She is Iranian as in from Iran, not Iraqui as in from Iraq.Just thought you should know.:) hmmm that just seems, not important, considering what is being discussed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dreamz Veteran Posted June 29, 2004 Veteran Share Posted June 29, 2004 sick sad world material? weird indeed. :blink: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MxxCon Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 it is absolutly impossible for anything like this to develop and live in human body. the only things that can possibly survive inside are bacteria and parasites that evolved to handle digestive juices and other defences. inside of a human body, be it stomack or vagina is absolutly nothing like a bond where frogs develop. this story is just another variant of an octopus urban legend http://www.snopes.com/pregnant/octopus.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nautica Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 I didnt know frogs lived in bonds? Do they trade in them to heh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoyablue Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 it is absolutly impossible for anything like this to develop and live in human body.the only things that can possibly survive inside are bacteria and parasites that evolved to handle digestive juices and other defences. inside of a human body, be it stomack or vagina is absolutly nothing like a bond where frogs develop. this story is just another variant of an octopus urban legend http://www.snopes.com/pregnant/octopus.htm A developing frog does not need an umbilical cord or a placenta to recieve food, that is why larvae can survive in the human body. The "embryo" itself recieves food within the larvae and thus no "bond" is needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armada Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 haha that would be hilarious to watch happen hahah :blink: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghatak Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 is this happened in 1662? or just now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hupp Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 thats just some crazyness Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Le_gin Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 ummm, ya, so that's pretty weird Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MxxCon Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 A developing frog does not need an umbilical cord or a placenta to recieve food, that is why larvae can survive in the human body. The "embryo" itself recieves food within the larvae and thus no "bond" is needed. Digestive juices will dissolve/kill/damage larvae/egg/tadpoles. It is impossible for any type or stage of development of frog to survive in a human body. And anybody who believes otherwise needs their head examined (But then again it is nspeds we are talking about here, so do not expect much) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bizkit Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 Whoever posted the link to the frog, does that even come close to looking human? I think she just got a frog stuck in her vagina, and when it fell out, she thought she gave birth to it. I think she was high. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sgtLENIN Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 heh..... BS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
altezza Veteran Posted June 29, 2004 Veteran Share Posted June 29, 2004 That's impossible :ninja: :blink: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven.ts Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 wierd and just not righ :no: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
54622_1437839486 Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 tahts weird Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctebah Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 tahts weird well put. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_NeMeSiS_ Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 SWEET! Lol, *gribbet* :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnsonBox Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 That is pointless and tiresome. Fake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EVO VIII Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 Maybe the father was just french. *rimshot* Thank you, Thank you. I'm here all week. :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dablitz Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 Maybe the father was just french.*rimshot* Thank you, Thank you. I'm here all week. :laugh: hahaha funny **** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoyablue Posted June 29, 2004 Share Posted June 29, 2004 Digestive juices will dissolve/kill/damage larvae/egg/tadpoles.It is impossible for any type or stage of development of frog to survive in a human body. And anybody who believes otherwise needs their head examined (But then again it is nspeds we are talking about here, so do not expect much) Not necessarely, it depends on the content of those digestive juices and what the larvae can survive in. In regards to head examination, I'm afraid that the general consensus on this board is that you are the one in need of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MxxCon Posted June 30, 2004 Share Posted June 30, 2004 so you are still questioning the fact that something that's designed to live/grow in fresh water ponds can survive and grow in stomack? MWAHAHAHAHAHAH go learn how body works, how digestive system works, what stomack acids are made of, and effects of such acids on an unprotected "food" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Destian Posted June 30, 2004 Share Posted June 30, 2004 I didnt know frogs lived in bonds?Do they trade in them to heh Your first sentence is not a question. Your second sentence is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
computerguy2004 Posted June 30, 2004 Share Posted June 30, 2004 she must of been a lose ho if it got in here (oops did i say that) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oVerboosT Posted June 30, 2004 Share Posted June 30, 2004 wow. lol damn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts