Something wrong?


Recommended Posts

I don't know why neowin doesn't get a heap of small servers and cluster them? They wouldn't get any of these nasty databse errors and they will have a 100% uptime ( excluding network outages ).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as i know, neowins servers are in theplanet DC?

Instead of having one big sevrer, why not have a cluster of say 5 servers? Serving HTTP synchro files with rsync ). Then have another seperate cluster of 2 servers serving mysql with replicator mysql function combined with rsync?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as i know, neowins servers are in theplanet DC?

Instead of having one big sevrer, why not have a cluster of say 5 servers? Serving HTTP synchro files with rsync ). Then have another seperate cluster of 2 servers serving mysql with replicator mysql function combined with rsync?

Pm redmark or other admin, then we shall dance

:bounce: :bounce: :bounce:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fark, that emotion dance thingy u did is pretty phat eh?

Well, i have done this type cluster before. It is very stable and there is 0 downtime unless there is a network problem.

Because if one server goes down, the main cluster then stops sending requests or traffic to the server that is down and sends it to the others, that way you have 100% hardware uptime and 99% network uptime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're working on load balancing the http servers, but things like uploads and cache files are a problem. Rsync isn't an option, unless it can be done instantly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.