Which is the best browser engine ever made?  

2407 members have voted

  1. 1. Which is the best browser engine ever made?

    • IE
      399
    • Opera
      504
    • Gecko (mozilla)
      1446
    • KHTML
      58


Recommended Posts

God I hate Gecko. I hate the way it loads pages. I will never, ever like the current method of loading pages more than IE's way. IE just gets the page and loads pictures...whereas Firefox gets some text, pushes it far to the right, pushes **** down, moves stuff back over to the left, has glitches all over it for 10 seconds, then corrects itself. I ****ing hat eit with a passion.

Yes, sometimes Gecko does that kind of things. But that doesnt mean it's slower than IE engine. (IMO, I think is faster than IE's engine in most of cases).

But something in Gecko annoys me:

If in an img tag width and height values are given, IE whill show an space with that values while the image is loading. I dont think Gecko does this. For example, if the image is in a cell with no 'absolute' size values, in Gecko that cell will get 'bigger' when the image loads. In IE not.

IE engine may have had a great standars support in the past (comparing to netscape at that same time). But now it's proven that IE standard compliance is not as good as other browsers. (For example, in IE, the css for div:hover won't work, so you have to play with anchors to do what you want. Opera and Gecko will show it the right way).

As a web developer, I think IE's engine is not that good anymore. It hasn't been trully updated since 1998!

I use Maxthon and love it. I get pretty much all the fetaures I would use in FF over IE (tabs, mouse gestures etc), but I keep the IE interface. I hate how it's so "uncool" to like IE right now. It's a good browser, get over it. I've never had any spy/adware problems with it in the last 7-8 years, I just run Adaware/SpyBot/AVG often, like everyone should...

Anyway, Maxthon gets my vote.

Peace.

How Internet Explorer's engine got more votes than KHTML is beyond me, but that's completely wrong. Safari is a great example of how KHTML works, and it works extremely well. I even prefer KHTML or WebCore (Safari's version of KHTML) to Gecko. KHTML is standards compliant, fast, and it doesn't have many security holes. Can't say the same about Internet Explorer.

I chose Internet Explorer, although I'd prefer GECKO.

The only reason why I chose MSIE was because of its portability. GECKO can't be used externally, and even if it's possible MSIE is so much easier to deploy than GECKO.

I would of chose GECKO because it's:

- Open source based,

- Very fast at rendering pages,

- Complient to W3C Standards (although standards complience isn't absolutely necessary to me), and

- cross compatibility with other operating systems.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Apple is expanding Private Cloud Compute beyond its own data centers by Pradeep Viswanathan At WWDC 2026, as part of the improved Apple Intelligence capabilities, Apple today announced that it is expanding Private Cloud Compute (PCC), its privacy-focused cloud infrastructure for Apple Intelligence, beyond its own data centers for the first time. Private Cloud Compute was designed to handle Apple Intelligence requests that are too complex to run fully on-device. The PCC system does not store user data and does not allow Apple or anyone else to access user requests. Last year, Apple also expanded its Security Bounty program with rewards of up to $1 million for researchers who could find serious vulnerabilities in PCC. Until now, Apple's PCC data centers were using Apple's own silicon. As part of the expansion, Apple is working with Google and NVIDIA to run new Apple Intelligence workloads on Google Cloud systems powered by NVIDIA GPUs. Apple will be using this new infrastructure to execute more demanding AI tasks while maintaining the same privacy and security guarantees of PCC. The new implementation uses NVIDIA Confidential Computing with NVIDIA GPUs, Intel CPUs with TDX, and Google’s Titan chip. Apple says it has worked with Google to build additional protections beyond a traditional confidential computing deployment. Despite the expansion to third-party data centers, Apple claims that its core PCC requirements remain unchanged, including stateless computation, no privileged runtime access, non-targetability, and verifiable transparency. The company highlighted that it will continue to control the PCC software stack, and Apple devices will only trust PCC software that has been cryptographically approved by Apple. To take security to the next level, Apple mentioned that it is maintaining an append-only ledger of Google Cloud hardware that is part of the PCC fleet. The company claims this will help reduce the risk of supply chain attacks. In addition to AI infrastructure, Apple also worked with Google to use technologies behind the Gemini family of models to build the next generation of Apple Foundation Models to power Apple Intelligence features across on-device and cloud workloads. As expected, for more demanding AI tasks like agentic tool use and complex reasoning, Apple will rely on the expanded PCC infrastructure running on Google Cloud. The expansion of PCC on Google Cloud will gradually ramp toward the full set of protections during the summer preview period. As before, Apple will also publish binaries for public inspection, provide research tooling, and give researchers access to live PCC nodes in research mode through the Apple Security Bounty Program.
    • my problem with outlook (new) is that it connects only to outlook.com. all connections to external providers goes through there. Got your mail server and want to use imap directly? no way... it adds a connector on outlook.com. last bug; if your email on an external provider if the same as principal email of your microsoft account, it doesn't work...
    • It's the only reason I finally have an iPhone (for work) and enjoy using it so much that I'm tempted to move from android next time I need to replace my own device
    • So is Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, just to mention a few. What's your point? Everyone is a threat from their enemies' perspective. I'd say that Israel is only a threat to their immediate enemies like Hamas, Hezbollah and the Iranian regime, not to anyone else.
    • The government is not the good guy either. You propose 99% of people require that the government overreach and govern their freedom of information and privacy, while ignoring the government is made up 100% of people, of which 99% are (as you described) brain dead. You can't have both. The reality is Signal is absolutely right and the government is doing what it has always done. Ignoring that we are their boss and grabbing all the power they possibly can to make sure we aren't. Your (societies) ###### parenting is not reason enough as to why I can't have a safe platform for my data/information. Thinking the government is helping is precisely what they are targeting psychologically to take suckers like you for a ride. "Think of the children" was, has, is, and will always be a mechanism of control. In the rare occasion it's actually essential the mass consensus has always been there and it doesn't become a debate.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      222
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      92
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      86
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!