Which is the best browser engine ever made?  

2407 members have voted

  1. 1. Which is the best browser engine ever made?

    • IE
      399
    • Opera
      504
    • Gecko (mozilla)
      1446
    • KHTML
      58


Recommended Posts

Windows is the best operating system for home users, hands down, because of application compatibility.

I think you need to start understanding that it depends on what someone expects from an OS and what he/she is going to do with it.

  • 3 weeks later...
It's so compatible is a valid argument.

yes, it is perfectly valid. sites are compatible with msie, not the other way around. it says nothing about how good msie is at all.

Windows is the best operating system for home users, hands down, because of application compatibility.

uh, no, there's more to quality than compatibility. but applications are compatible with windows, not the other way around.

Along the same lines, we can argue that MSIE is good because the overwhelming majority of sites are compatible with it.

no. that's got nothing to do with msie's quality.

  • 2 weeks later...

IE, Firefox, Opera and Sadari are all good to me but if I wanted to pick a favourite, I would choose IE as for me it is the simplest to use, especially with the IE7 Beta 2 Preview though Opera 9 TP 2 comes a close second. I haven't tried the new Firefox 2 Codename "Bon Echo" but will do soon enough.

PSG22

yes, it is perfectly valid. sites are compatible with msie, not the other way around. it says nothing about how good msie is at all.

uh, no, there's more to quality than compatibility. but applications are compatible with windows, not the other way around.

no. that's got nothing to do with msie's quality.

Usefulness is a measure of quality.

Usefulness is a measure of quality.

A Mac is extremely useful with only 1/10th of the application library that Windows has. Compatibility has nothing to do with quality. In this case, it's only a measure of the quality of the individual applications.

Honestly, the same goes for websites. Quality of the browser isn't reliant on compatibility with crap. I'd much rather have a browser that works perfectly well on quality sites and web applications (Writely, Basecamp, Flickr, etc.) I'm sure those devs would be a lot happier if they could just use one iteration of XMLHttpRequest and a standard stylesheet/XHTML combo.

This post asks for the best browser *engine*, so looking at the standards support, I'd have to say Gecko is the best overall, although Opera 9 will pull ahead a bit. I don't have much information for KHTML and WebKit, but from personal experience and some initial testing, I put Gecko and Presto (Opera) quite a bit ahead of them. Trident (Internet Explorer) is dead last among popular browsers, and Internet Explorer 7 isn't much better.

  • 2 weeks later...

Talking browser engine purely, I would go with Opera due to it having the best standards compliance than all of the others. Though I haven't tried the KHTML one (only linux right and my Linux box isn't live yet); Gecko is getting overrated IMO. My girlfriend's PC hates it, but dunno if that's Firefox or the engine's fault.

KHTML, best standards support, fast and until recently, the only browser engine that passed ACID2 (opera's newer nightlies join it).

First there was Safari (WebKit), then Opera (Presto), although iCab and KHTML are close, they don't pass it (they ignore a certain CSS rule that should be applied, makes the window show scroll-bars)

Gecko is getting there, and Trident are slowly moving towards it.

First there was Safari (WebKit), then Opera (Presto), although iCab and KHTML are close, they don't pass it (they ignore a certain CSS rule that should be applied, makes the window show scroll-bars)

Gecko is getting there, and Trident are slowly moving towards it.

Indeed Gecko is getting there..

http://flickr.com/photos/dbaron/126886608/

i really get sick of people bitching about web standards like article posted on frontpage then disspeard strandards are rules that are there to follow if you want they really in theory dont mean a damn hell of alot most popular websites arn't valid but who cares they work ffs!

...

most popular websites arn't valid but who cares they work ffs!

Yes, because they have to work around bugs in browsers interpretations of the standards.

End users don't care about them (hence the number of posts saying standards are stupid), but they all seem to like the fact the pages they go to work in their browser of choice, the only reason that happens is because the people who write the site have to make changes to their code until they work properly (if all browsers were standards based, any page would look the same in any browser).

And if you really hate the standards that much, stay with IE6 or less, as with IE7 MS has gotten serious at supporting the W3C specs (hence why IE7 is alot better than IE6, still lags behind the other browsers though)

  • 3 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Movavi Video Editor Plus 26.17.0 by Razvan Serea With Movavi Video Editor Plus, you can either enhance your video files with two or three simple steps, or turn them into something completely new. Create your own movies using multiple filters, transitions, and special effects: show multiple videos on one screen with the Picture in picture effect or change the background with the Chroma Key effect, imitate the camera zoom or make your video look like an old-style movie. Adjust video parameters such as brightness, contrast and colors. Stabilize shaky footage, improve video quality and remove defects. Create video presentations, tutorials or educational videos: add titles and record your own narration to create a video with voiceover. Import video from any source: TV-tuner, webcam, camcorder, or VHS. Drop multiple media files onto a timeline and let your imagination do the rest! Features at a glance: Video and audio editing on a timeline Edit, enhance videos Add background music Apply titles and effects Image quality improvement Hollywood-worthy effects High-grade titles and fades Digitize VHS tapes, record video from TV tuners Stabilize any shaky sections Support for a wide range of formats Prepare your videos for uploading to YouTube, Facebook, Vimeo, or any other website New in Movavi Video Editor 2026: 30+ fresh subtitle styles. Upgrade your automatic captions with new designs. Customize your text in the Styles tab with a single click. Optional advanced settings are also available in the dedicated Design tab. Subtitles in English – instantly! Translate auto-subtitles into English with a click – no dictionaries or online services needed. Once translated, configure and fine-tune the subtitles using the standard editing tools. 40+ adjustable effects. Enhance your videos in a click with new realistic effects – from dust particles and light leaks to retro-style and VHS. Every effect is fully customizable – so it will fit any clip perfectly and bring an extra spark to your edits. Ultra-fast playback. Show more in less time with video speed control of up to 100x. Perfect for epic time-lapses, long process recaps, or whenever you want to add some extra energy to your content. Magnetic zones are marked with dots, and the 1x value is indicated by a vertical line. Silence removal – in a click. Cut out unwanted pauses automatically or fine-tune the pause length and volume threshold yourself. Skip the tedious cleanup and make your videos more dynamic. Fast effect copying. Effortlessly duplicate any effect from one video to another: click Clip effects in the dropdown menu and proceed to copy or paste. Movavi Video Editor Plus 26.17.0 changes: A new set of subtitle styles Check out the latest drop of ready-made subtitle styles with active word highlighting – fully designed and ready to use. Each one has its own vibe, so you can quickly find the perfect match for your video. Give them a spin and pick your favorite. Download: Movavi Video Editor Plus 26.17.0 | 2.7 MB (Shareware) View: Movavi Video Editor Plus Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • "New" Outlook has themes and colours and all sorts of visual customizations not just black and white.
    • What a bizarre statement. Why are you against users having choices? Are you against all extensions or just ad blocking? What about extensions to alter the W11 start menu to suit user preferences. Are you against those?
    • Honestly, I've been using the Lite version for a couple of months now, and it's been working well for me in my daily life. So much that I don't even miss the original version.
    • I use classic for reliability. Dark grey is vastly better than the all black or all white of new outlook.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      skylerssviv earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      mobmobiles earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      230
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      98
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      91
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      82
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!