• Sign in to Neowin Faster!

    Create an account on Neowin to contribute and support the site.

Sign in to follow this  

THe People's Court

Recommended Posts

jessejlt    0

I just saw a case where the plaintiff sent his television to be repaired (6/03/02), the defendant claimed that the plaintiff did not pickup his television after he was told it would cost an additional 200.00 to fix the television, after many months the defendant disposed of the television.

The Judged ruled that the defendant couldn't prove he had sent a letter to the plaintiff informing him to pickup his television, so she ruled in the defendants favor, however the defendant was awarded a 100.00 deposit and 200.00 value of the television. If the plaintiff was willing to pay 300.00 to have the television fixed, but not 500.00, wouldn't that make the value of the television 300.00 ?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
TimeRider    0

Not necessarily. The plaintiff is entitled to the value of the TV at the time of the loss, not the value of the item once repaired . . . or what it was worth to plaintiff to repair it. $200 for a broken TV seems like a pretty good settlement.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.