neoufo51 Posted May 27, 2005 Share Posted May 27, 2005 A risk for embryos from perfumeCommon chemical linked to changes in reproductive organs of unborn boys By Marla Cone Los Angeles Times Originally published May 27, 2005 Scientists studying the human effects of hormone-mimicking chemicals have reported that compounds called phthalates used in plastics and beauty products, and widely found in people, seem to alter reproductive organs of baby boys. In the first study of humans exposed in the womb to phthalates, the researchers, who examined the genitalia of male babies and toddlers, found a strong relationship between the chemicals and subtle changes in the size and anatomy of their genitals. Phthalates are ubiquitous compounds used as softeners in plastics and to maintain color and fragrance in beauty products such as nail polish and perfume, among other uses. It is the first time that scientists have shown that any industrial compound measured in mothers' bodies seems to disrupt the reproductive systems of their babies. But many experts, including the authors of the report published today in the online version of the journal Environmental Health Perspectives, say that more research must be done to determine whether the genital abnormalities in the boys lead to fertility or health problems and to prove that they are caused by phthalates. The findings were based on tests of 85 mothers and sons, averaging nearly 13 months of age, born in Los Angeles, Minneapolis and Columbia, Mo. Mothers with the highest levels of chemicals in their urine late in pregnancy had babies with a cluster of effects: The span between the anus and penis, called anogenital distance, was comparatively short, and the infants had smaller penises and scrotums and more cases of incomplete descent of testicles. Medical experts do not know whether babies with those physical characteristics will later develop reproductive problems. But in newborn animals, laboratory studies show that combination of effects can lead to lower sperm counts, infertility, reduced testosterone and testicular abnormalities when they mature. "In rats it's called the phthalate syndrome. What we found for the first time is evidence for this syndrome in humans," said Dr. Shanna Swan, the study's lead researcher and a professor in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry. "Animals [exposed to phthalates] definitely have decreased testosterone, so it is likely that this is happening in humans too." The study is the strongest evidence yet that manmade chemicals in the environment can feminize male babies in the womb. Yet scientists say a larger study of babies should be conducted, and they should be followed into adulthood to see whether they develop low sperm counts or any other reproductive problems. "It's such an important observation, you'd like to see this done again, with more children and another population," said Earl Gray, a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency reproductive toxicologist whose research has found that phthalates feminize male rodents. The Los Angeles Times is a Tribune Publishing newspaper. http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nationwor...world-headlines Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pajter Posted May 27, 2005 Share Posted May 27, 2005 Lol, so now you can judge by the size of a man's penis, if his mother uses cosmetics... :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sophism Posted May 27, 2005 Share Posted May 27, 2005 so thats why my.... uhh nevermind.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hypoxiaicon Posted May 27, 2005 Share Posted May 27, 2005 That has to be the most absurd thing Ive read all day! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Techy_ Posted May 27, 2005 Share Posted May 27, 2005 so thats why my.... uhh nevermind.. 585979470[/snapback] lol weird, I thougth the same....er :whistle: Nothing to see here, keep scrolling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L3thal Veteran Posted May 27, 2005 Veteran Share Posted May 27, 2005 Interesting article, to say the least. I still can't quite believe it :pinch: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bukowski Posted May 27, 2005 Share Posted May 27, 2005 wow, i guess my mom was a damn stinky woman because my pe..... nvm :ninja: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neoufo51 Posted May 27, 2005 Author Share Posted May 27, 2005 Interesting article, to say the least. I still can't quite believe it :pinch: 585979666[/snapback] Logically, it makes sense...but yeah...still a ridiculous side to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kombolcha Posted May 27, 2005 Share Posted May 27, 2005 YAY! my mom couldn't afford those when she was pregnant with me :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OPaul Posted May 29, 2005 Share Posted May 29, 2005 Hmm, odd my penis is rather large and my mother uses all those types of beauty products. I guess there's always an exception. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denis W. Veteran Posted May 30, 2005 Veteran Share Posted May 30, 2005 Lol, so now you can judge by the size of a man's penis, if his mother uses cosmetics... :laugh: 585979460[/snapback] FLOL :D :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pink Floyd Veteran Posted May 31, 2005 Veteran Share Posted May 31, 2005 oh come on anything else Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lav-chan Posted June 1, 2005 Share Posted June 1, 2005 Not necessarily strictly relevant to this article, but the whole penis-obsessiveness thing is really stupid. Like it matters AT ALL. We aren't cave people anymore, you are not going to fail in life if you don't have the strongest legs or the biggest penis. Jesus Christ, 200'000 years and some people still aren't over it. Anyway, i'm fairly certain that there has been controversy over this before. This phthalates (God that's a tongue-twister) thing. They've known about the hormone stuff, it's just now that they've got more conclusive studies about it. And i'm sure it's not the only thing affecting babies. :shrug: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farstrider Posted June 1, 2005 Share Posted June 1, 2005 so thats why my.... uhh nevermind.. 585979470[/snapback] Ha ha Hmm, odd my penis is rather large and my mother uses all those types of beauty products. I guess there's always an exception. 585987368[/snapback] This roughly translated, means that it is very small!! :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Kompressor Posted June 1, 2005 Share Posted June 1, 2005 Not necessarily strictly relevant to this article, but the whole penis-obsessiveness thing is really stupid. Like it matters AT ALL. We aren't cave people anymore, you are not going to fail in life if you don't have the strongest legs or the biggest penis. Jesus Christ, 200'000 years and some people still aren't over it.Anyway, i'm fairly certain that there has been controversy over this before. This phthalates (God that's a tongue-twister) thing. They've known about the hormone stuff, it's just now that they've got more conclusive studies about it. And i'm sure it's not the only thing affecting babies. :shrug: 585998492[/snapback] calm down! They aren't taking them off the shelves just yet. ;) :laugh: suppose they later find out it also affects female boobs and cause them to be flat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anthony Posted June 1, 2005 Share Posted June 1, 2005 suppose they later find out it also affects female boobs and cause them to be flat. 585999783[/snapback] But we have surgery for that ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Louisiana Lightning Posted June 1, 2005 Share Posted June 1, 2005 UMmm, what's this about again. Some experiments, they can donate that money to the needy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rec_kris Posted June 1, 2005 Share Posted June 1, 2005 oh come one. everyone knows that penis size is determined by post-count and computer specs. DUH ! :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AxelStone Posted June 3, 2005 Share Posted June 3, 2005 Note: The main concern of this article was reproduction not size. The size thing is just a guy thing... you wouldnt understand... or if your a guy... your just angry :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keito Posted June 3, 2005 Share Posted June 3, 2005 I am so going to sue my mom! >.< Lol... just had to say that :p Nice article :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tagerd0g Posted June 3, 2005 Share Posted June 3, 2005 I feel sorry for Tammy Faye Messner's (formerly Tammy Faye Baker) son(s). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts