Facelifted Subaru Impreza WRX


Recommended Posts

Makes it easier to put a SAAB badge on the grille and make it the 91...

(And yes, I'm being serious - look at the shape of the current SAABs grilles)

Edit: Sorry 92 - and here's a pic...

586001432[/snapback]

Makes sense since GM owns Saab and has a controlling interest in Subaru's parent company (Fuji Heavy Industries) (I think). If not a controlling interest, then a very close relationship (according to this, Fuji Heavy Industries is part of the GM Network). The Saab 91 and the Impreza Wagon share the same platform, so for the Saab to borrow some style elements from the new Imprezas would not be a surprise to me.

It will be interesting to see where everything goes from here. I did not like the the new STi's look when I first saw it (what did they do to my baby?), but what is under the hood is more important to me than what the front looks like (because that can be potentially modified which I am sure will happen if the new look makes enough people gag). Sure the under-the-hood components of the STi can and are modified, but I do not think they are the issue here.

To each his own

-- OxygenOne

Hmm the front is more like the older model which looked more aggressive as it was more square and less rounded.

The back ends are still boring but the only Imprezza traits, the front looks nothing like what we all know as an Imprezza :/

585992544[/snapback]

i agree with this but i quite like the front of the new one ;)

i kind of like it (i have been a fan of WRX's for a while now), but i really dont like those huge spoilers (on this car or any car at all).....they just seem to be for compensation of a lacking of something else :whistle:

585992534[/snapback]

It was called a spoiler for a reason :p

img1563w5pu.jpg

586003394[/snapback]

in my opinion this one was great. all newer model including current are fugly. i hate the current headlights.

however this new headlights are much better. i dont really like the back lights and wing, but the frond is great once more. i like it a lot. i dont mind the middle hole too.

subaru-wrx-06-sti-1.JPG

Edited by panacea

/me thanks god he bought his WRX in '03

i like the new headlights, but the grill is nasty. i dont like the big square hole in the center. the lights though, i do like. i like the 04 lights as well, i dont like my big basketball headlights :(

why more wings? no street car needs a wing to begin with, why add more drag to a street car by adding the wing above the rear window? the insainely large wing on the trunk is already too much.

why more wings? no street car needs a wing to begin with, why add more drag to a street car by adding the wing above the rear window? the insainely large wing on the trunk is already too much.

Well, the only cars that would benefit from the wings would be RWDs and AWDs. Since the WRX STi is an AWD, the large spoiler in the rear would help it generate more rear downforce, which is what most "street", drag, and slalom cars need. Hell, if they removed the wing during WRC/rally, they'd probably crash more often. :)

Well, the only cars that would benefit from the wings would be RWDs and AWDs. Since the WRX STi is an AWD, the large spoiler in the rear would help it generate more rear downforce, which is what most "street", drag, and slalom cars need. Hell, if they removed the wing during WRC/rally, they'd probably crash more often. :)

586029297[/snapback]

wrc ralley and street cars are so insaignly difernt im suprised you botherd to compare.

drive has nothing to do with it, a FWD car needs downforce just as much as a RWD or AWD, its a function of vehicle dymanics, and how weight moves around the corners of the car while driving.

down force dosent kick in till about 118MPH on a street car style wing, most street cars dont see 100mph in a 1/4 mile.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google Chrome is killing all uBlock Origin bypasses, Microsoft Edge, Opera to follow by Sayan Sen For a while now the transition away from Manifest V2 (MV2) to MV3 has been on-going and it looks like it is entering its final phase of deprecation, at least, in the case of Google Chrome. A recent discussion thread in the w3c WebExtensions Community Group GitHub repo has highlighted how the latest and upcoming versions of the most popular browser are expected to be its final releases with support for MV2 extensions. Chromium contributor Andrey Bershanskiy shared details about recent Chromium changes and according to comments from Google engineer Devlin Cronin, Chrome has now started removing the flags that previously controlled MV2 availability. kExtensionManifestV2Disabled, the Chromium feature flag that allowed controlled disabling of MV2 add-ons, is now completely removed, which means you will likely no longer find uBlock Origin in your browser extensions list. He wrote: "The kExtensionManifestV2Disabled feature has been default-enabled for over a year. Remove the feature and the effectively-dead code. ... Any tests that relied on being in the "warning" phase (i.e., with the kExtensionManifestV2Disabled) for their sole behavior testing are removed, since this stage is no longer reachable." Cronin further explained why MV2 extensions are no longer allowed in supported Chrome versions as maintaining the associated functionality indefinitely is no longer possible. He cited growing technical difficulties and implementation complexities as well as security concerns. He wrote: "MV2 extensions are no longer allowed in any supported version of Chrome, and we are removing support for them and the associated functionality. We won't be able to provide / maintain this functionality indefinitely due to the complexity and tech debt, as well as the security risks it entails (we've actually found a number of bugs that are specific to MV2 lately). Of course, other browsers can continue supporting these if they so desire. Unfortunately, we won't be putting code behind a compilation flag ... We won't be removing all the MV2 code wholesale right away, so many of these things will continue working for awhile (but they will go away eventually, and some may go away sooner than others)." What this essentially means is that the tricks and bypasses that were used to keep MV2 extensions like uBlock Origin and others alive will not work any more on Chrome, or at least not for very long. For example the Windows Registry mod that could extend MV2 availability will cease to function after Chromium version 151. Here is a rundown of the changes coming in the final such releases of Chromium releases: Chromium 150 lost ExtensionManifestV2Disabled option Chromium 151 will loose ExtensionManifestV2Unsupported option Chromium 151 will loose ExtensionManifestV2Availability option Chromium 151 will likely loose AllowLegacyMV2Extensions option Other Chromium-based browsers like Opera and Microsoft Edge could soon follow suit too. Although it is not specified, Edge began disabling uBlock Origin back in February, and Opera could also stop the functioning of MV2 add-ons, even though it had committed to support MV2 for longer in October 2024. uBlock Origin developer Raymond Hill (gorhill) apparently stated the following: "For Opera I did submit 1.70.0 rather late, but this was weeks ago. A while ago I received an email from Opera that they plan to abandon MV2-based extension so maybe they are no longer allocating resources for reviewing such extensions." The email which developers like Gorhill mentions was received from Opera last year. Here is what it seemingly said: Hence for now the only Chromium browser that seems to be on-board fully with MV2 support is Brave, and perhaps Vivaldi as well. Meanwhile if you want to ditch Chromium browsers entirely then Mozilla Firefox is an excellent alternative as MV3 and MV2 are both supported. Of course the easiest solution is to switch to uBlock Origin Lite if you want to remain on Chrome, as it is MV3-based, but from our experience, uBO Lite does not seem to be as good as the original non-Lite version. Source: w3C (GitHub repo) As an online publication, Neowin too relies on ads for operating costs and, if you use an ad blocker, we'd appreciate being whitelisted. In addition, we have an ad-free subscription for $28 a year, which is another way to show support!
    • Write to your MP 😄 Like believing in Santa. Total surveillance IS the goal. Wake up.
    • This whole dumb age verification thing needs to die and be replaced by giving parents tools to control devices. Why am I required to plaster my ID all over the internet to prove I'm old enough when parents should be the ones dictating what their kids are doing on their phones. Apple released great set of tools for iPhones coming to iOS 27 that do just that. Why are governments not mandating that kind of control to phone makers to built them into phones. This whole thing is so absolutely idiotic it's wild.
    • Remeber this decade, when the free internet died... tell your grand kids about this, record there reaction and post it on InstaTwitBook.com
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      220
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      92
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      83
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!