-hurley18 Posted June 8, 2005 Share Posted June 8, 2005 so,is this a real bad no no for 56k users? cause i done the tweak then read that post :unsure: should i go back to default? 586032663[/snapback] go back? no, theres a huge difference in pages like devianart so it works Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iconboy Posted June 8, 2005 Share Posted June 8, 2005 still waiting for someone to point out the downside ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Posted June 8, 2005 Share Posted June 8, 2005 wow this really does work, thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crimson Behelit Posted June 8, 2005 Share Posted June 8, 2005 Neowin forums are super slow using this trick... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitedragon Posted June 8, 2005 Share Posted June 8, 2005 Man, what a difference! DA is loading sweet now. Neowin forums are blazing along, too! :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HPMCommander Posted June 8, 2005 Share Posted June 8, 2005 Whoa. Significant improvement over here. Sweeeet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
:: Lyon :: Posted June 8, 2005 Share Posted June 8, 2005 Same here, even with Neowin forums. So I'm not sure what happen to those people that saying Neowin's forum is actually much slower using this trick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xpgeek Posted June 8, 2005 Share Posted June 8, 2005 Um, way old. But anyway, person asking for drawback, about nglayout.initialpaint.delay : By default, Firefox doesn't try to render a web page for 250 milliseconds while it's waiting for data. If you add the code below to your user.js file, Firefox immediately starts to display the page, even without complete data. The drawback, especially on slower machines, is that the total time to display the page will be longer. about pipelining : Pipelining is an experimental feature, designed to improve page-load performance, that is unfortunately not well supported by some web servers and proxies. Source : http://www.mozilla.org/support/firefox/tips#oth_rendering I use the pipelining feature, but setting the max requests to anything above 8 is pointless as theres a built in limit of 8. I dont use the nglayout.initialpaint.delay tho because everythings already very fast for me and waiting half a second longer for the page to load properly doesn't bother me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mamba720027 Posted June 8, 2005 Share Posted June 8, 2005 wow what and increase.............my pages takes lest than 3 seconds to load. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorak Posted June 8, 2005 Share Posted June 8, 2005 Thanks for the tweak info. (Y) Yeah it wasn't 90% faster but it did noticably increase in speed. And those, with broadband, who think it slowed down, have to revisit the page they were just on. The first time I went to Neowin after the tweak it too excessively longer, actually, to load up. However, the next try it went much faster than normal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xpgeek Posted June 8, 2005 Share Posted June 8, 2005 Thanks for the tweak info. (Y)Yeah it wasn't 90% faster but it did noticably increase in speed. And those, with broadband, who think it slowed down, have to revisit the page they were just on. The first time I went to Neowin after the tweak it too excessively longer, actually, to load up. However, the next try it went much faster than normal. 586033157[/snapback] Um, thats probly cause the page was now Cached. Try it with pipeling on, and without the nglayout.initialpaint.delay tweak because that one can actually make it take longer then non tweaked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason S. Global Moderator Posted June 8, 2005 Global Moderator Share Posted June 8, 2005 i had those settings already... and im using Deer Park 1... but i added the last nodelay thing... no difference yet though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+M2Ys4U Subscriber¹ Posted June 8, 2005 Subscriber¹ Share Posted June 8, 2005 wow thanksedit: if i set a lower Network.http.pipelining.maxrequests would it be better for 56k? like instead of 30 put 20 586032616[/snapback] 8 is the maximun anyway... still waiting for someone to point out the downside ;) 586032690[/snapback] It breaks some older servers and proxies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ventrox Posted June 8, 2005 Share Posted June 8, 2005 WOW got some increase in speed :D thanks for the tweak any negative aspects of using this feature? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pink Floyd Veteran Posted June 8, 2005 Veteran Share Posted June 8, 2005 this has been said so many times and increasing number of connection can hammer a website :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McLaren_F1 Posted June 8, 2005 Share Posted June 8, 2005 yeah. its seems to be faster. i combined these tweaks with it too: http://www.tweakfactor.com/articles/tweaks...foxtweak/4.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
er0n Posted June 9, 2005 Share Posted June 9, 2005 Yeah this was posted months ago in essential guides. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
futb0l Posted June 10, 2005 Share Posted June 10, 2005 Don't see any differences here... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeSmiC Posted June 11, 2005 Share Posted June 11, 2005 awesome Narutorocker, thx u so muc :yes: h Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P!P Posted June 11, 2005 Share Posted June 11, 2005 I notice a difference. Not that sites load faster, but that you can see the site faster. Which is better for me. Nice to click something and see something instantly. Even if it's not the complete site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyranthus Posted June 11, 2005 Share Posted June 11, 2005 https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=243907 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeathGod Posted June 11, 2005 Share Posted June 11, 2005 https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=243907 586047883[/snapback] what are u trying to get at? There both different Settings and Narutos Works Better Thanks Naruto,Why Can't People Appreciate Others when There Trying to help. :hmmm: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ventrox Posted June 11, 2005 Share Posted June 11, 2005 just wondering... i know it's not the right thread to ask about, but is there something similar that can be achieved in IE? :p thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArchReaper Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 Thanks Alot , Nice Job. Helped ALOT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chouzan Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 1. Variations of this tweak have been posted several times before. 2. There is a hard-coded limit of eight requests to a client, thirty is non-beneficial. 3. Everyone's supposed increase in speed is an impression mostly had by disabling render delays. 4. You have absolutely no idea how taxing this is to a web server, pipelining is wasteful of bandwidth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts