TwIzTiD_Juggalo Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 1.300 years is suitable. i would of voted electric chair or some other death sentence though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hidea Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 maybe he should be raped 1300 times :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Warwagon MVC Posted July 13, 2005 MVC Share Posted July 13, 2005 isn't a bullet cheaper? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+virtorio MVC Posted July 13, 2005 MVC Share Posted July 13, 2005 well if people lived 1300 years then yes that might be a good idea, but it seems pretty pointless to do that. If he wanted to give the guy a big punishment (which is sounds like the judge did, and rightly deserved as well) then he should have been more creative in the scentence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sachleen Posted July 13, 2005 Share Posted July 13, 2005 seems fair, 1300 years does sounds an awful lot but he will only have to be in there another 40-50 years before he dies 586182102[/snapback] why 1,300 years? sound stupid, 100 years sounds more normal for a sentence for life. 586182106[/snapback] yeah, why do they do that... just kill the ******. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghatak Posted July 17, 2005 Share Posted July 17, 2005 1300 years wow can he live that long? :blink: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts