Fedie Posted July 30, 2005 Share Posted July 30, 2005 Here we go!! I didn't have any problems just a clean instalation. It toke me 50 minutes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
autodefe Posted July 30, 2005 Share Posted July 30, 2005 How's the spellcheck on Beta 1 workin' for ya? :shifty: </obligatory> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laptop Posted July 30, 2005 Share Posted July 30, 2005 Working fine about 1.30hrs installing specs of it working here >> https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=350811&hl= Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xtreme $niper Posted July 30, 2005 Share Posted July 30, 2005 Installed fine within the hour. It came enabled with LDDM and everything I wanted like aero glass and all. I didn't have to install no special drivers for it, and for that I am really happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrMB Posted July 30, 2005 Share Posted July 30, 2005 Yep fine here too. Install was smooth if a little long. Booting is a tad quicker than with XP and to my suprise the glass effects were enabled by default and running very smoothly on my fx5200. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josrh Posted July 30, 2005 Share Posted July 30, 2005 How's the spellcheck on Beta 1 workin' for ya? :shifty: </obligatory> 586297219[/snapback] I lol'd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jexel Posted July 30, 2005 Share Posted July 30, 2005 looks awesome, can't wait until it's final relase Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xtreme $niper Posted July 30, 2005 Share Posted July 30, 2005 Yep fine here too. Install was smooth if a little long. Booting is a tad quicker than with XP and to my suprise the glass effects were enabled by default and running very smoothly on my fx5200. 586297273[/snapback] Its weird, but my XP boots up twice as fast than Vista. But when actually in Vista, it seems to run faster in general. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alpha2004 Posted July 30, 2005 Share Posted July 30, 2005 Thats because its a fresh install... oOOoo btw, how do you make the icons in the taskbar bigger (ones next to sys clock? Mine are tiny as hell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xtreme $niper Posted July 30, 2005 Share Posted July 30, 2005 Thats because its a fresh install...oOOoo btw, how do you make the icons in the taskbar bigger (ones next to sys clock? Mine are tiny as hell 586297328[/snapback] Yeah I figured it was because its a fresh install. But I was playing around with a fresh install of XP not too long ago and I can sort of tell this runs smoother and it responds quicker. Not as much hard drive grinding just to open Documents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavin001 Posted July 30, 2005 Share Posted July 30, 2005 I cant get it connected 2 the net and mine freezes 2 a white screen once i try 2open anything :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axel Posted July 30, 2005 Share Posted July 30, 2005 Mine was working absolutely brilliantly until I installed the nVidia nForce drivers which F'ed the graphics up for some reason. My ATI Radeon 9600 Pro handled the Glass and DWM effects very smoothly until this little mishap. Very fast boot as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fkid Posted July 30, 2005 Share Posted July 30, 2005 Aero has not been implemented yet (Beta 2?), so all of you excited that it works on your PC and older graphics card (with that nice, new visual style) should keep that in mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vice Posted July 30, 2005 Share Posted July 30, 2005 Installed fine, I checked the clock as I started the install and when it finished it took 53 minutes. installed it on a NTFS partition created with Partition Magic from Symantec within XP. Specs of the system I installed it on in my profile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josrh Posted July 30, 2005 Share Posted July 30, 2005 Aero has not been implemented yet (Beta 2?), so all of you excited that it works on your PC and older graphics card (with that nice, new visual style) should keep that in mind. 586297382[/snapback] What is the difference going to be between Aero Glass, and the final Aero? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malisk Posted July 30, 2005 Share Posted July 30, 2005 Aero has not been implemented yet (Beta 2?), so all of you excited that it works on your PC and older graphics card (with that nice, new visual style) should keep that in mind. Aero is implemented in a basic form (the style is named Aero nowadays), but it'll evolve from here. Even more signs Aero is already here in the form we see it is that it makes use of LDDM drivers to offload graphics work on the GPU. It's just maybe not as *pretty* with as many effects as it'll have, but that's another thing. Vista is still Vista although it's only in Beta 1. Same thing. Personally, no probs with install on my experimental partition. No LDDM drivers at first, but quickly fixed with nvidia's alpha drivers. Right now I just don't have sound. Grr... It didn't identify my Audigy LS, and the LS drivers I tried to download from Creative's site told me they didn't detect an LS card on my system when I ran the install. Weeird... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bryce_56 Posted July 30, 2005 Share Posted July 30, 2005 I installed the 64 bit version and it went without a hitch (except that it is really slow installing). I don't get the glass effects. I really don't like that the installation does not give you any indication of how long it will take or countdown at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cpu killer Posted July 30, 2005 Share Posted July 30, 2005 What is the difference going to be between Aero Glass, and the final Aero? 586297401[/snapback] Same difference between Watercolor and Luna. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
null_ Posted July 30, 2005 Share Posted July 30, 2005 Installation was smooth, took roughly 45 minutes. Operation is smooth and stable, everything works well, it's a little faster than a fresh install of Windows Server 2003, and a lot faster than Windows XP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimRogers Posted July 30, 2005 Share Posted July 30, 2005 Can't wait to get it myself! Is Glass enabled by default? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
null_ Posted July 30, 2005 Share Posted July 30, 2005 Can't wait to get it myself! Is Glass enabled by default? 586297610[/snapback] If your video card supports it and there are LDDM drivers, yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B3AN Posted July 30, 2005 Share Posted July 30, 2005 Install went pretty smooth for me, no major problems but a couple of bugs. Glass effect enabled with nvidia driver release. Still no sound for my realtek onboard soundcard though :-( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xav Posted July 30, 2005 Share Posted July 30, 2005 45 minutes end to end, ran the core of the install from XP so as to remain dual bootable and not waste a DVD-R. Def not a primary OS just yet, but well worth having to experiment and test. All I need now are some audigy2PeX drivers... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Hiroshi- Posted July 30, 2005 Share Posted July 30, 2005 30 minutes, succesfull installation, everything worked out of the box, no bugs found when starting Vista, and shutting down vista, small errors in apps, which are cosmetic graphical bugs. Currenty have my resolution at 1280x1024 32-bbp Aero glass, no lag at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zerone Posted August 3, 2005 Share Posted August 3, 2005 Well my installation did fine, and took about 45 minutes. No problem with graphic drivers on the beggining (just downloaded Nvidia Alpha after) and the network drivers were already installed, so I had internet on the way. Installation was smooth, took roughly 45 minutes.Operation is smooth and stable, everything works well, it's a little faster than a fresh install of Windows Server 2003, and a lot faster than Windows XP. 586297608[/snapback] I've installed Server 2003 and it was the fastest Win OS I have ever put my hands on. Longhorn is really faster than it? Because mine is a bit choopy on explorer, rather tough installing programs is like 50% faster than XP. Specs: P4 3.2 Ghz HT (512KB Cache) Asus P4C800 E-Deluxe 1GB Ram GeForce FX 5700 Samsung 160GB SATA Any one with similar specs, wanna tell me your experiences? :rofl: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts