• Sign in to Neowin Faster!

    Create an account on Neowin to contribute and support the site.

Sign in to follow this  

$1million annually To study origin of life

Recommended Posts

vincent    154
Harvard University is beginning a research project to study how life began.

The team of researchers will receive $1 million in funding annually from Harvard over the next few years. The project begins with an admission that some mysteries about life's origins cannot be explained.

Most scientists believe that life on Earth originated in a soup of chemicals, but nobody knows how the chemistry moved from organic to biological. Theorists also suggest that life here could have arrived embedded in a space rock kicked up from Mars billions of years ago.

Still another idea is that microscopic life is common in the universe and could have reached Earth from another location.

"My expectation is that we will be able to reduce this to a very simple series of logical events that could have taken place with no divine intervention,'' said David R. Liu, a professor of chemistry and chemical biology at Harvard.

The "Origins of Life in the Universe Initiative'' is still in its early stages, scientists told the Boston Sunday Globe. Harvard has told the research team to make plans for adding faculty members and a collection of multimillion-dollar facilities.

Evolution is a fundamental scientific theory that species evolved over millions of years. It has been standard in most public school science texts for decades but recently re-emerged in the spotlight as communities and some states debated whether school children should also be taught about creationism or intelligent design.

Intelligent design holds that life on Earth is too complex to have developed through evolution, implying that a higher power must have had a hand in creation. Backers of intelligent design argue that because scientists don't have all the answers, there must be a designer we can't grasp.

Scientists say that intelligent design and evolution makes no scientific predictions and is not testable, and so it is not a scientific theory. Scientists freely admit they don't know everything, but they cite the history of figuring things out as evidence that mysteries do not imply divine, undecipherable solutions.

Harvard has not been seen as a leader in origins of life research, but the university's vast resources could change that perception.

"It is quite gratifying to see Harvard is going for a solution to a problem that will be remembered 100 years from now,'' said Steven Benner, a University of Florida scientist who is one of the world's top chemists in origins-of-life research.

Source

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
leaving_    0

I wish I could get some of that Harvard dole...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MrStoo    0

Theres so many questions about life and the universe and so little answers, if they research in this maybe there will be more answers, i'm glad they are researching into something like this it is so amazing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Danny1810    0

There'll be complaints about this no doubt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
vincent    154
There'll be complaints about this no doubt

586387236[/snapback]

Oh yea, Then there is the whole idea of "Intelligent Design" that our good ole Bushy Wushy wants to implement in the schools

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Danny1810    0
Oh yea, Then there is the whole idea of "Intelligent Design" that our good ole Bushy Wushy wants to implement in the schools

586387274[/snapback]

I have no problem with it being taught

but not in science class, if you wish to teach it in bible class then fair enough.

Scientists don't demand that Big Bang theory is taught during RS/RE etc so why should creationism be taught during physics class?

:crazy:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
vincent    154
I have no problem with it being taught

but not in science class, if you wish to teach it in bible class then fair enough.

Scientists don't demand that Big Bang theory is taught during RS/RE etc so why should creationism be taught during physics class?

:crazy:

586387301[/snapback]

Exactly, to me Intelligent Design under estimates nature. we shouldn't even question the limits of nature, just study the complexity of it as we make more discoveries. I personally doubt there is a limit on how "complex" nature can get.

ID is just Religion's way of taking credit for everything and putting the "god" stamp on it and says "well you discovered this and how it works, i just wanted to let you know that this was God's work"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Danny1810    0

I love the whole 'its perfectly suited to us, therefore it must be made for us' argument.

it's just like a net

a load of holes tied together

:yes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fighter-X    0
Exactly, to me Intelligent Design under estimates nature. we shouldn't even question the limits of nature, just study the complexity of it as we make more discoveries. I personally doubt there is a limit on how "complex" nature can get.

ID is just Religion's way of taking credit for everything and putting the "god" stamp on it and says "well you discovered this and how it works, i just wanted to let you know that this was God's work"

586387328[/snapback]

hahaha I agree :laugh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.