Matt Posted August 15, 2005 Share Posted August 15, 2005 Sheehan's Husband Seeks Divorce Bush roadside protester named in California petition filed Friday AUGUST 15--The next well-wisher approaching Cindy Sheehan at her tent encampment outside President George W. Bush's Texas vacation home may actually be a process server. That's because the California woman's husband--in a curious bit of timing--filed for divorce Friday afternoon. With Sheehan, 48, entering a second week outside Bush's Crawford retreat, her husband's divorce petition cites "irreconcilable differences" for the demise of the couple's 28-year marriage (the Sheehans, the document states, have been separated since June 1). Along with a Vacaville home, Patrick Sheehan listed other "community assets" as "any and all benefits payable as a result of son's death," including a Prudential insurance policy and "benefits from the U.S. Government." From her roadside outpost, Sheehan, whose 24-year-old son Casey, an Army Specialist, was killed last year in Iraq, has become the face of the U.S. antiwar movement, telling reporters that she will not budge until Bush meets with her and explains "why our sons are dead." Noting that Bush has referred to the war as a "noble" pursuit, Sheehan told Reuters, "If it's such a noble cause, why aren't his daughters over there?" Patrick Sheehan's lawyer, Glen DeRonde, did not return a TSG call, so it is unclear whether the divorce complaint will be delivered to her in Texas or when she returns to her home east of San Francisco. (4 pages) http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0815051sheehan1.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Veteran Posted August 15, 2005 Veteran Share Posted August 15, 2005 Of course divorce is a fairly common thing to happen after the death of a child (it is extremely tramatic on a marriage after all). But lets just ignore to attack a women who lost her son to a war that the President did in fact start. A low blow attack at that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the long lost son Posted August 17, 2005 Share Posted August 17, 2005 But lets just ignore to attack a women who lost her son to a war that the President did in fact start. A low blow attack at that. 586381101[/snapback] Yes, to a war HE VOLUNTEERED FOR. He chose to go. Not his mother, not President Bush but HIM. He was the one who decided to go into the war. Anyways, after everything that this woman has been saying, she has absolutely no credibility at all. Her husband is right. If what she's doing is so noble and warranted, why isn't he and the rest of the children and family with her? That's right, because they don't agree with what she's doing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lav-chan Posted August 17, 2005 Share Posted August 17, 2005 Her husband is right.? If what she's doing is so noble and warranted, why isn't he and the rest of the children and family with her?? That's right, because they don't agree with what she's doing.586391961[/snapback] Yeah, because 'noble' is obviously an objective term. I can't stand The Smoking Gun. What a trashy Web site. Here and there they'll have something that's interesting or amusing, but for the most part they just post completely irrelevant garbage about celebrities. They act like they're trying to bridge the gap between celebrities and real people by giving them the same media treatment that anyone else would get, but that's nonsense. The only difference between The Smoking Gun and Access Hollywood is that TSG's trivial gossip is accompanied by pictures of official documents. Anyway, regardless of whether i agree with what this woman is doing (and i don't think i do, but whatever), her marital status is none of my business. What's more, it hanothingi> to do with her actions regarding her son. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the long lost son Posted August 18, 2005 Share Posted August 18, 2005 Anyway, regardless of whether i agree with what this woman is doing (and i don't think i do, but whatever), her marital status is none of my business. What's more, it has nothing to do with her actions regarding her son. 586392195[/snapback] And you know this how? Are you one of the two parties? Or are you either one of their lawyers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lav-chan Posted August 18, 2005 Share Posted August 18, 2005 I was referring to the fact that her getting divorced has no bearing on my opinion regarding her 'acting career' (as i suppose you could call it). As it should have no bearing on yours or anyone else's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the long lost son Posted August 18, 2005 Share Posted August 18, 2005 I was referring to the fact that her getting divorced has no bearing on my opinion regarding her 'acting career' (as i suppose you could call it). As it should have no bearing on yours or anyone else's. 586394163[/snapback] Oh, okay. I guess I misunderstood. Anyways. It does have some bearing because it kind of shows the reasons why she's really doing what she's doing. At least that's how I see it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaZurk Posted August 28, 2005 Share Posted August 28, 2005 And you know this how? Are you one of the two parties? Or are you either one of their lawyers? 586394009[/snapback] Then forget the fact that if it has to do anything with this. and keep it to. Their marital status is none of our business. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boffa Jones Veteran Posted August 28, 2005 Veteran Share Posted August 28, 2005 Then forget the fact that if it has to do anything with this. and keep it to. Their marital status is none of our business. 586443226[/snapback] It seems that by plastering herself all over the media she made it our business whether we like it or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gfunk4life Posted August 28, 2005 Share Posted August 28, 2005 she is crazy very very crazy she left her mother and her mother got sick and her husban is living her, she is the only one in her family that blames bush she is crazy. she also said bush should put his party girls in iraq(he cant you can only enter the army at 18 and at 18 they can do anything they want). i think a family said that bush killed their son then like 4-8 months they said sorry they were just mad and sad that they son died or something like that(like i said i think so if im wronge sorry) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts