LK. Posted August 18, 2005 Share Posted August 18, 2005 Aug 18 2005 Daily Post A MID Wales man yesterday told a jury he did not know how 90 child porn photos ended up on his home PC. James Ansell, 29, claimed he was not responsible for them being there. The jury at Mold Crown Court heard his-then girlfriend Emma Roberts called in police. She found the images when she switched off the computer at his-then home in Picton Street, Llanidloes, in April last year. Ansell was arrested, his computer was seized, and 90 indecent images of children were found - more than 50 of them deliberately saved in a file. Andrew Thomas, prosecuting, said Ansell lived alone, possesses the PC's password and claimed he must have surfed the net for child porn. He said the PC was used on the day of Ansell's arrest to search for porn, when he alleged the defendant was at home alone. Simon Mills, defending, told the jury Ansell had no explanation for the images, found on a second hand computer bought from a man in Shropshire in 2002. But they could not be sure he downloaded them, and he was adamant he did not. In evidence, Ansell said he did watch adult porn on the computer, but it was mainly used for music purposes. But he denied watching child sex. Ansell of Gwaelod y Bryn, Llanidloes, denies four specimen charges of making indecent photographs and five charges of possessing them. The trial before Judge John Rogers QC is proceeding. http://icnorthwales.icnetwork.co.uk/news/r...-name_page.html Photo taken from source Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viserov Posted August 18, 2005 Share Posted August 18, 2005 Couldn't they check with his ISP to see what sites he visited? LOL, and he watched adult porn for "music purposes"? WTF is that? By the way, he doesn't look 29. I'd believe 19, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matocaster Posted August 18, 2005 Share Posted August 18, 2005 Maybe he likes porno-funk music? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zedaxax Posted August 18, 2005 Share Posted August 18, 2005 simply look at the date modified of the pic and theyll know if it was downloaded after he bought the pc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crimson Behelit Posted August 18, 2005 Share Posted August 18, 2005 Is that a pic of the defendant? Or is that a pic of one of the children? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Veteran Posted August 18, 2005 Veteran Share Posted August 18, 2005 Couldn't they check with his ISP to see what sites he visited?LOL, and he watched adult porn for "music purposes"? WTF is that? By the way, he doesn't look 29. I'd believe 19, though. 586396980[/snapback] Maybe he likes porno-funk music? 586396997[/snapback] The article stated the computer was used mostly for musical purposes, not the adult porn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SergeantNoob Posted August 18, 2005 Share Posted August 18, 2005 I think that's one of the children. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emo Posted August 18, 2005 Share Posted August 18, 2005 Is that a pic of the defendant? Or is that a pic of one of the children? 586397017[/snapback] both. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wak1zashi Posted August 18, 2005 Share Posted August 18, 2005 Is that a pic of the defendant? Or is that a pic of one of the children? 586397017[/snapback] :rofl: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illicit Posted August 18, 2005 Share Posted August 18, 2005 Is that a pic of the defendant? Or is that a pic of one of the children? 586397017[/snapback] Good question. The caption under the pic says "Caged: Child porn pervert Cronin". lol :rofl: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psybapunk Posted August 18, 2005 Share Posted August 18, 2005 seems as the picture has nothing to do with the article that was quoted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viserov Posted August 18, 2005 Share Posted August 18, 2005 The article stated the computer was used mostly for musical purposes, not the adult porn. 586397031[/snapback] :rofl: Okay, I sit corrected. I read it as the other way around. :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viserov Posted August 18, 2005 Share Posted August 18, 2005 seems as the picture has nothing to do with the article that was quoted. 586397086[/snapback] Yeah, the photo is of Darren Cronin, 20, another child porn sicko. Not the same guy in the article. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nexus Posted August 18, 2005 Share Posted August 18, 2005 The article stated the computer was used mostly for musical purposes, not the adult porn. 586397031[/snapback] So he likes listening to music while watching kiddie porn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drone Posted August 18, 2005 Share Posted August 18, 2005 Why did they send him all the way to Mold from Llanidloes? Its 77 miles. They could have sent him to Aberystwyth. Its only 20 miles away. Plonkers. Plus, why have you put the pic of someone else at the bottom of the post? (and WHY is he smiling?? The freak) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viserov Posted August 18, 2005 Share Posted August 18, 2005 (and WHY is he smiling?? The freak) 586397135[/snapback] That photo could have been taken months or years prior. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commodore Max Posted August 19, 2005 Share Posted August 19, 2005 Couldn't they check with his ISP to see what sites he visited?LOL, and he watched adult porn for "music purposes"? WTF is that? By the way, he doesn't look 29. I'd believe 19, though. 586396980[/snapback] :laugh: ... Music Purposes !! The article stated the computer was used mostly for musical purposes, not the adult porn. 586397031[/snapback] Ohhh ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sn00pie Posted August 19, 2005 Share Posted August 19, 2005 Nasty ****, but that's pretty funny how his girlfriend called the police! :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferret Posted August 19, 2005 Share Posted August 19, 2005 If he comes up with an excuse of "for music purposes" then I wouldn't believe that he didn't download the images ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hum Posted August 19, 2005 Share Posted August 19, 2005 :rolleyes: pfft ... What is jailing this guy for simply looking at pictures going to accomplish ? Nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lighthalzen Posted August 19, 2005 Share Posted August 19, 2005 If what he says is true, NEVER BUY SECOND HAND COMPUTERS. *Unless you format the hard drive 50 times and use those hard drive erasing software 100 times. :p :p :rofl: :rofl: * Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michelonia Posted August 19, 2005 Share Posted August 19, 2005 She found the images when she switched off the computer at his-then home in Picton Street, Llanidloes, in April last year. You know when I switch off my computer, the only images I see are the blue one and the it is off. I suggest that they have a word with the young lady that calls herself his ex-girlfriend. Women can do some really nasty things when you **** them off. Could be you know.!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts