killmaster84 Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 I would take it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Japlabot Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 I would take it if there was no obligation to do anything in return (ie: Favours, Traffic Drugs, Pay back... Give personally idenfiable information to get back to me) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sacrifist Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Not sure about anywhere else, but in the states i heard that about 90% of the money you touch has had cocaine or meth snorted through it, unless its brand new. So what difference does it really make. I would by a hipocrit if i said no, so yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blush Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Yes, I would most likely accept it because I would be desparate for any kind of relief I could get. 586490741[/snapback] Ditto. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrchetsteadman Posted September 8, 2005 Author Share Posted September 8, 2005 I voted yes. Seeing as my daughter and I are trying to pay out $175.00 a month more than we bring in since my wife left us with all the bills, I would jump on it faster than a duck on a june bug.Cody 586491975[/snapback] Haha, I like the analogy... Not sure about anywhere else, but in the states i heard that about 90% of the money you touch has had cocaine or meth snorted through it, unless its brand new. So what difference does it really make. I would by a hipocrit if i said no, so yes 586493781[/snapback] It's actually about 97% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amodin Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Already have in the past - when my department seized it in a raid. :p I didn't personally of course, but still... :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangermcfadden Posted September 11, 2005 Share Posted September 11, 2005 Not sure about anywhere else, but in the states i heard that about 90% of the money you touch has had cocaine or meth snorted through it, unless its brand new. So what difference does it really make. I would by a hipocrit if i said no, so yes 586493781[/snapback] Partially true. http://www.snopes.com/business/money/cocaine.asp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kombolcha Posted September 12, 2005 Share Posted September 12, 2005 yep. money is money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mAcOdIn Veteran Posted September 12, 2005 Veteran Share Posted September 12, 2005 Well I hate getting money of any kind, I qualify for food stamps and was devestated when the H&R block lady told me aI should apply when I did my taxes, and I never applied for that and that's money obtained legally, so I really hate free money. Don't get me wrong I'd sell something to a drug dealer for cash easy but the concept of aid or free money really makes me feel like ****. I dunno though, as little as I make, I've never been in a situation like alot of the victims of hurricane Katrina so I can't say. If the drug dealers donated to the red cross then I guess I'd have a higher chance of taking it than if they showed up at the shelter just handing it out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
905punk Posted September 12, 2005 Share Posted September 12, 2005 97% of all $50 bills currently in circulation have traces of cocaine on them. And yes, yes i would. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts