4074, 5048, 5112 or 5219?


What is the best build of Vista between 4074, 5112 and 5219?  

56 members have voted

  1. 1. What is the best build of Vista between 4074, 5112 and 5219?

    • 4074 (WinHEC 2004 Build)
      5
    • 5048 (WinHEC 2005 Build)
      0
    • 5112 (Beta 1)
      7
    • 5219 (PDC 2005 Build)
      44


Recommended Posts

Older polls asked about the better build, but there were only old builds that are for the most part unstable, unusable and ugly. Now there is a poll on all the newest builds of Vista, from april 2004 (4074) to september 2005 (5219).

What do you think?

I wait for your answers...

Edit:Sorry for the question, I forgot 5048...

Edited by thom225
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tough decision. 5219 is definetly the most stable but I think I enjoyed 4074 the most because of the many features it included (WINFS, Explorer Integrated Sidebar, Revised Photo Viewer, etc.)

4074 actually felt like a new OS wheres 5219, while decidedly stable on my machine, feels like a Windows XP refresh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The PDC build is good but what's even better is that the bugs I logged for it are being updated / fixed right now, so the next build is going to be so much better!

I hope it's an interim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4074 is by far the most attractive, and, whilst it might be hollow and superficial, that's what was always most important to me. I'm still using it now, and haven't found it to be any more unstable than xp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't say it, but I like most 5219 because there are more features than any other builds, and Avalon is shaping up, and that lets UX become close to the real Aero (or Project M, I don't know) will look like

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.