Zirus Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 Does anyone find it odd that when you go to cmd and type systeminfo the OS name shows up as Windows 2000 Professional ? I just thought I'd point that out. I find it odd because Vista is supposed to be built off of a different (newer) codebase. Since they changed that in XP and Server 2003, I just find it funny that it says 2000. and YES, I DO know that its BETA so gimmie a break. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoochieMamma Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 Hey names don't really bother me, I just want absolutly NO 8bit colour icons ANYWHERE in the system. That also goes for crappy files aswell (a'la clock.avi) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commodore Max Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 That's quite interesting ... Someone should investigate this. Whoever has 2003 should go do the same thing, so we can compare ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zirus Posted September 29, 2005 Author Share Posted September 29, 2005 I've got Server 2003. It says: OS Name: Microsoft® Windows® Server 2003, [edition name here] Edition Different Editions: Web Server, Enterprise, Small Busniess, Standard, Datacenter, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lasker Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 obviously Vista is not build from scratch even when Microsoft said is a totally new, all OS from the NT to Vista are using the NT foundation, the only new they add is new stuff into the OS and the command window are almost the same crap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lunamonkey Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 obviously Vista is not build from scratch even when Microsoft said is a totally new, all OS from the NT to Vista are using the NT foundation, the only new they add is new stuff into the OS and the command window are almost the same crap 586594111[/snapback] Correct. If I was to rebuild my house from scratch, I would reuse the bricks where I could, but I might add new windows. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hottoast Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 Its not easier task to build Fresh New OS from scratch.....Its based on Millions Lines of Codes! 586594138[/snapback] :yes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xahid Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 Its not easier task to build Fresh New OS from scratch..... Its based on Millions Lines of Codes! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malisk Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 Not sure when MS said Vista would be totally new. It's a major revision to the NT code, but it's still NT code, and Longhorn was always NT 6.0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
golazo Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 I just want absolutly NO 8bit colour icons ANYWHERE in the system. but they are oh so sexy :cry: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoochieMamma Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 but they are oh so sexy :cry: 586594229[/snapback] You call these sexy???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ev0| Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 who cares ? is that all you guys care about ... new icons ? go use a mac FFS ! :angry: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoochieMamma Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 who cares ? is that all you guys care about ... new icons ? go use a mac FFS ! :angry: 586594282[/snapback] I care because they are ugly and useless and most of these garbage files (for example clock.avi) are taking up space that should be free.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimRogers Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 Those icons are nasty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evilpig Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 I agree, I've always hated those icons... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kcinay Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 Hey names don't really bother me, I just want absolutly NO 8bit colour icons ANYWHERE in the system. That also goes for crappy files aswell (a'la clock.avi) 586588472[/snapback] Yeah, that will so change the OS! :rolleyes: K Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoochieMamma Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 Yeah, that will so change the OS! :rolleyes: K 586594337[/snapback] Did I say it would change it? I said that legacy files like these should NOT be in an OS that is supposed to be next generation. I don't care how small all of these files are, if they all add up to 20MB thats 20MB too much imho. They shouldn't be there full stop.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chrispynutt Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 I agree, also if that is/was MS's general mentality what redundant code is left lying around that we can't see? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aquafox Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 I agree, I've always hated those icons... 586594336[/snapback] Same Here.... Except that could give graphics artist for XP an idea.....new icons for MS Device Managaer / System manager, etc, etc? and they SHOULD remove those crappy irrelevant files; such as: Clock.AVI Sample Music from the 'My Music Folder':: They seriously do Suck! Tour Windows XP (or other versions...) You catch my drift :D and they should make a version of windows, with Developer Edition....'Microsoft Vista Developer Edition'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoochieMamma Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 I agree, also if that is/was MS's general mentality what redundant code is left lying around that we can't see? 586594674[/snapback] I would a assume ALOT.. :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raskren Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 Hey names don't really bother me, I just want absolutly NO 8bit colour icons ANYWHERE in the system. That also goes for crappy files aswell (a'la clock.avi) 586588472[/snapback] Well, we might be in luck. The new Vista UI guidelines state that: All icons used in Windows Vista client (for items such as applications, devices, document types, and control panels) must adhere to the Aero-style icon guidelines. You must replace all Win 9x and Win 3.1 style graphics. Windows XP-style graphics can be used in Windows Vista, but are also recommended to be updated to the new style and quality. Now, I don't know if this only applies to *new* applications or pre-existing stuff like all the MMC snap-ins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoochieMamma Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 Well, we might be in luck. The new Vista UI guidelines state that:Now, I don't know if this only applies to *new* applications or pre-existing stuff like all the MMC snap-ins. 586594745[/snapback] Interesting, but will they still be left on the system for "compatibility reasons"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raskren Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 Interesting, but will they still be left on the system for "compatibility reasons"? 586594769[/snapback] Gawd, I hope not. Maybe we'll see a Vistaize app like the Xpize app we have now. http://xpero.msfn.org/ Has anybody figured out what clock.avi is for anyway? Edit: Many of the Xp icons have an 16-256 color version. They probably could use new Vista icons (32 bit) for the MMC with a 16 and 256 color version just in case. Why not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seafirex Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 Well they said that the kernel was new the gui interface too, but not the full OS, if someone can show me a place where a original "not remade" document form M$ telling there restarted everything from scratch, then i will say they said it but not before. Also just to point out, the command prompt is the one from win2000 but only till the beta command prompt that beta testers are testing is final then they will replace the current one with the final new command prompt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoochieMamma Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 Edit: Many of the Xp icons have an 16-256 color version. They probably could use new Vista icons (32 bit) for the MMC with a 16 and 256 color version just in case. Why not? 586594786[/snapback] Thats not too bad, but I still would rather have only 32bit icons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts