Foxit Reader 1.3 Build 1231 Released


Recommended Posts

Cyber Dog
Happy New Year, everyone!

First, a new feature in this build:

Back/Forward navigation: now you can keep track when you use links, bookmarks or other ways jumping around the document.

This build also fixed a number of problems:

1) Sometimes symbolic characters were not displayed correctly. In fact, Foxit Reader now embeds two symbolic fonts developed by our font designers, so no matter what kind of Windows system you have, you can always view those symbols now;

2) Fixed a number of "fail to search text" problem;

3) An important performance improvement for viewing with large zoom scale;

4) Gouraud shading (a technique used by many 3D graphics system) now supported.

http://www.foxitsoftware.com/foxitreader/

http://www.foxitsoftware.com/foxitreader/foxitreader.zip

http://www.foxitsoftware.com/foxitreader/f...eader_setup.exe

Edited by Cyber Dog
Link to post
Share on other sites
xpgeek

Thanks for update.

Edit :

Got zip package, and got 1.3 build 0104.

Edited by xpgeek
Link to post
Share on other sites
xpgeek

Downloaded installer from here and got right version.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Wildies

really a great alternative for adobe and more liter than it..

thanx for the update..

Link to post
Share on other sites
-Medic-

*NEW UPDATE*

Foxit Reader 1.3 Build 0104 Released 01.04.2006

This build fixed the toolbar problem in Internet Explorer.

For download the same old link above.

About Build number :

12.31.2005 = build 1231

01.04.2006 = build 0104

Link to post
Share on other sites
xpgeek

Isn't 0104 a lower number then 1231 ? That doesn't seem to make sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites
DigeratiPrime

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites
Dark Reaper

Isn't 0104 a lower number then 1231 ? That doesn't seem to make sense.

I was confused too but I just realized that it represents the day and month the version was released. It's a new year, that's why the number is lower.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Viserov

I guess it'd be less confusing if they used 20060104 and 20051231, but any updates for this awesome program is welcomed by me, regardless of a few numbers. :p

Link to post
Share on other sites
war

Sweet, finally. :)

Yes I too was confused with version numbering at first glance...

Link to post
Share on other sites
xpgeek

Ohhh, yea it does make sense now that I see it as dates. Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.