Malechai Veteran Posted January 11, 2006 Veteran Share Posted January 11, 2006 I am a white, heterosexual male and not afraid to say it. why would you be afraid to say that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fock neow1n Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 I agree with most people here when they say this thread is stupid. Who cares if someone is gay or straight, let them be. Quit picking at the issue, just let it happen as if it were natrual. Only people that have a problem with these kinds of situations are people afraid of change and different people. Wars have been fought because of fear, that should end. I'm sure we weren't meant to mingle in other people's business. So whether they are gay, straight, white, black, irish, oriental, hispanic, jewish, buddhist, from another planet, or handicapped it should not affect you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werejag Posted January 11, 2006 Author Share Posted January 11, 2006 why would you be afraid to say that? did you read the rest of the thread. this was a semi quote from another I agree with most people here when they say this thread is stupid. Who cares if someone is gay or straight, let them be. Quit picking at the issue, just let it happen as if it were natrual. Only people that have a problem with these kinds of situations are people afraid of change and different people. Wars have been fought because of fear, that should end. I'm sure we weren't meant to mingle in other people's business. So whether they are gay, straight, white, black, irish, oriental, hispanic, jewish, buddhist, from another planet, or handicapped it should not affect you. yes exactly that is the point of this thread to show how stupid being ashamed of your kid being a ___________ fill in the blank. is very stupid. thank you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catharsis Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 This question is ridiculous. It's trying to say that, if we're not ashamed at our child being straight, we shouldn't be ashamed at them being gay. Well, since this is based off of a relative morality, let me pose another morally relative question (please note that I am not agreeing with the following)... Would you be ashamed if your child was a serial rapist of children? If not, then why should you be ashamed if he is a serial rapist of children? Actually, I don't even need to make the argument of Absolute Morality here. Nature itself speaks against homosexuality. Not to mention that "homosexuals" (who, in my opinion, and the opionion of many professional counselors of "homosexuals," are heterosexuals who do not realize their gender identity, or have somewhere along the line thrown it out the window) stastically live half as long as heterosexuals. Oh, and I try not to "let them be." Homosexual lifestyles are destructive. Do the research. We need to care about them. I know many people will now probably regurgitate that "tolerance" garbage that's been fed them by the liberal media. But guess what? You only have to "tolerate" things that are bad. Do I "tolerate" something that's good? No, I embrace it. If it must be tolerated, chances are, by definition, it's not good. (Of course, by some people's definition of tolerance, they are now obligated to "tolerate" me and this viewpoint. :) ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
remix17 Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 I don't understand the point of this poll. I seriously don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Litespeed Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 They can choose what they like, but don't expect their father to have anything to do with them if they choose to be gay. Frankly, you don't know anything about kids until you have them. Sure, you can have all the fantasies you like, but just be prepared to forget them all when you hold your child for the first time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malechai Veteran Posted January 11, 2006 Veteran Share Posted January 11, 2006 did you read the rest of the thread. this was a semi quote from another yes exactly that is the point of this thread to show how stupid being ashamed of your kid being a ___________ fill in the blank. is very stupid. thank you Yea I did. I was just curious as it struck me as a somewhat of an odd statement. Thanks for the answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leesmithg Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 This is what annoys me. I am called straight if I am not homosexual. I am heterosexual. Now the opposite of straight would be bent under the laws of my country this is seen as being anti homosexual calling somone bent or a bender. It's seen in the same light as homophobic behaviour. Can we stick to homosexual or heterosexual? It seems that being bent is nasty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seasponge Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 They will know where you stand and if they do happen to have this sexual preference they will simply not bother to tell you, or indeed anything else that they may have on their mind. That, or they will tell you to go to hell. 'Choosing' your sexual orientation is just as stupid as choosing what foods you enjoy and which foods you hate. ever heard of an acquired taste? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seasponge Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 Allow me to be blunt and "flaming" here... I cannot believe this thread was not locked in the 5 hours it's been up, for the blatent troll that it is against our real gay poll thread. Is this supposed to be some kind of ****ing statement for homosexuality? The question proposed by this thread is stupid to the point of a new stupidity benchmark. If you are upset your child didn't turn out gay, didn't choose to be discriminated against for the rest of their life and didn't choose to rob you out of biological granchildren, you are not fit to be a proper parent. This is why gay people are discriminated against in the first place. No one cares where you stick your dick in the privacy of your own bedroom. And most of us do accept that it's possible to be biologically predispositioned to be gay, which makes us very tolerant towards it. An advantage even for you ****ed up queers who are gay completely by choice, for the "adventure." It's the parade leading fanatics who give gays a bad name, the gays who think homosexuality is something to be proud of, who try making ****ed up points about how it may even be more normal than heterosexuality, when it's obviously a disorder which interferes with your primary goal of procreation as a living organism. Yes, I am a white, heterosexual male and not afraid to say it. I am not here to be politically correct either. If you're offended, bite me (but not literally). If you're gay and not offended, right on. i'll bite, thanks for provoking me :) how is it a disorder if i chose to be gay? don't be jealous because some people have realized their full sexual potential. and make no mistake all people have the sexual capacity to desire same sex and opposite sex partners. most are just too chicken to question their sexuality because they might find out that sometimes they fancy some one of the same sex. sexuality and sexual identity are social constructs. heterosexuality is an institution that should be destroyed so people can realize their full sexual potential and not be harnessed by culturual societal standards. next time you are watching porn look at the man's big beautiful penis and touch yourself, think: might it be possible that his organ turns me on? the way he moves? what is wrong with parades? i think gay people have the right to be proud of themselves for standing up in a world that is unaccepting of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werejag Posted January 11, 2006 Author Share Posted January 11, 2006 This question is ridiculous. It's trying to say that, if we're not ashamed at our child being straight, we shouldn't be ashamed at them being gay. Well, since this is based off of a relative morality, let me pose another morally relative question (please note that I am not agreeing with the following)... Would you be ashamed if your child was a serial rapist of children? If not, then why should you be ashamed if he is a serial rapist of children? Actually, I don't even need to make the argument of Absolute Morality here. Nature itself speaks against homosexuality. Not to mention that "homosexuals" (who, in my opinion, and the opionion of many professional counselors of "homosexuals," are heterosexuals who do not realize their gender identity, or have somewhere along the line thrown it out the window) stastically live half as long as heterosexuals. Oh, and I try not to "let them be." Homosexual lifestyles are destructive. Do the research. We need to care about them. I know many people will now probably regurgitate that "tolerance" garbage that's been fed them by the liberal media. But guess what? You only have to "tolerate" things that are bad. Do I "tolerate" something that's good? No, I embrace it. If it must be tolerated, chances are, by definition, it's not good. (Of course, by some people's definition of tolerance, they are now obligated to "tolerate" me and this viewpoint. :) ) "Nature itself speaks against homosexuality." this is not true the opisit is true that most animals have homosexuality in the 10 % range. check out the book http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/031219239...glance&n=283155 Biological Exuberance : Animal Homosexuality and Natural Diversity . "stastically live half as long as heterosexuals." please provide this this info. refence please. ive seen a simular study and its been debunked ages ago. your view on tolerance is not surprising becuase the religous right has filled you head with false defintions. bit your handlers and think for once on your own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_INk Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 (god i hate teh intranets...) -isn't there alredy a thread for this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrKuro Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 So.......Would you be ashamed if your child grew up to be... The Kool-Aid Man!?!? OH YEAH . . . . . . . These threads need to stop. I can also be annoying. :shiftyninja: :devil: :blink: :blush: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quixotic Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 This question is ridiculous. It's trying to say that, if we're not ashamed at our child being straight, we shouldn't be ashamed at them being gay. Well, since this is based off of a relative morality, let me pose another morally relative question (please note that I am not agreeing with the following)... Would you be ashamed if your child was a serial rapist of children? If not, then why should you be ashamed if he is a serial rapist of children? Actually, I don't even need to make the argument of Absolute Morality here. Nature itself speaks against homosexuality. Not to mention that "homosexuals" (who, in my opinion, and the opionion of many professional counselors of "homosexuals," are heterosexuals who do not realize their gender identity, or have somewhere along the line thrown it out the window) stastically live half as long as heterosexuals. Oh, and I try not to "let them be." Homosexual lifestyles are destructive. Do the research. We need to care about them. I know many people will now probably regurgitate that "tolerance" garbage that's been fed them by the liberal media. But guess what? You only have to "tolerate" things that are bad. Do I "tolerate" something that's good? No, I embrace it. If it must be tolerated, chances are, by definition, it's not good. (Of course, by some people's definition of tolerance, they are now obligated to "tolerate" me and this viewpoint. :) ) You, Sir, are a moron. You cannot group every homosexual under one 'lifestyle'. The only thing all homosexuals have in common with each other is that they are sexually attracted to their own gender. There are myriad types of lifestyles within the homosexual community as there are within the heterosexual community. Promiscuity is not unique to homosexuals! Why is the divorce rate in the USA so high there buddy boy? Those are straight people getting divorced, separating straight families and leaving their children torn between two homes. That's pretty damned fvcked up and destructive if you ask me. You've got your ueber manly-man on the straight side just like we've got our flaming campy feminie acting guys on our side. You just hate us so much that you have to find 'something' to make your hatred and bigotry make sense. Unfortunately, saying that the homosexual lifestyle is destructive is a cheap, ignorant and absurd way to make your argument. There are gays that are promiscuous, there are gays out there that don't want committment, that fvck everything in site; but the same can be said for heterosexuals. I'm not knocking heterosexuals, people are the way they are; promiscuity and infidelity can be found ACROSS the board; disease can be transmitted from BOTH sides, so please tell me in your bigot opinion, what unique destructive quality we have in OUR lifestyle that hurts you so much? I don't blame heterosexuality for the divorce rate in this country, I blame the PEOPLE, the HUMAN element not the sexually-oriented element. You friggen bigots are all so blinded by your faith that you compare apples with oranges. Stop, really; no really, just stop for a second and think about it. We are not all the same. There are some gays that don't even practice sex, does that make them not gay? Being gay isn't the lifestyle, it's just who the person is attracted to, get that straight! If you want to attack promiscuity, then attack it by all means, but it's not our unique trait. If you want to attack infidelity as the cause for the downfall of our society, then you're going to have to attack infidelity in ALL its forms, HOMO and HETERO; and I'll agree with you, infidelity and promiscuity are detrimental to families and happiness, you can't just say GAY promiscuity is the problem or GAY infidelity is the problem. Get a clue man, really. Edit: And I don't think this post was stupid, it served a very good point which I think the OP intended. I think he was trying to say with his post that asking the question the other way around ( as in the other post ) was in itself stupid because you should love your children unconditionally, and if you're ashamed of your child for any reason, then it does not qualify as unconditional love. The thread was started to prove a point, I think; not really to gauge anyone's opinion. Both polls should have had 100% in favor of no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werejag Posted January 12, 2006 Author Share Posted January 12, 2006 quixotic thanks for your posts. your spot on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killmaster84 Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 Nope, they could be gay,staright, whatever they want to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crazzy88ss Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 there's actually people who would be ashamed their kid was straight...? Now I'm guessing only somebody who's gay would vote for that, and if you're gay to begin with, shouldn't you be supportive of any choice "your" child makes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Litespeed Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 there's actually people who would be ashamed their kid was straight...? Now I'm guessing only somebody who's gay would vote for that, and if you're gay to begin with, shouldn't you be supportive of any choice "your" child makes? Generally yes, they should be, but people are people. Take the deaf community for example. I have heard deaf people say that they would rather their children be born deaf than hearing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leddy Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 Generally yes, they should be, but people are people. Take the deaf community for example. I have heard deaf people say that they would rather their children be born deaf than hearing. That deaf person really needs to be shot then. I've never heard of someone say they'd like their kids to be born disabled. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kernatch Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 My family is the cause, I will not challenge my family. So you'd be ashamed that your son or daughter wants to have an opinion that differs from yours. Oh.. fair enough. Dictatorship homes I'm sure are great places to live. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seasponge Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 bwahahahahaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrchetsteadman Posted January 13, 2006 Share Posted January 13, 2006 Hell Naaaahhhh!!! Lmao!!! I am all for pro choice any everything but damn! This has to be the stupidest thread ever! For the people who voted yes, what sense does that make? All you people are doing is taking sides, you really wouldn't be ashamed. You are just being ignorant. Look at it this way, if your child ISNT straight, it cannot procreate meaning no more children to carry on your legacy. Meaning no OTHER gay children. No children period. So if, and I stress IF you really would be ashamed if your child is straight, you are stupid and should be kept away from children period. You are a threat to the human race, the message you want to spread is anti-life. Where the hell do you think babies come from? Just a hint, not the stork! :angry: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raum Posted January 13, 2006 Share Posted January 13, 2006 Well not everyone feel sthat this is exactly a "threat" when there are 6 billion + of us. *rolls eyes* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaffra Posted January 13, 2006 Share Posted January 13, 2006 i dont care about religion or carrying on my legacy, but it would be good to have a son that has a similar prefrence to the opposite sex as his old man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E t h a n Posted January 13, 2006 Share Posted January 13, 2006 My girl's due in May, and straight or gay I'll love our child. What a question to ask!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts