I personally find Winamp 3 to be slow, and overly complicated for the features it has. The cross-fader in the early Winamp 3 betas was the only feature I genuinely liked, but that feature was added into WinAmp 2, starting at version 2.78.
Don't get me wrong, though, I still think Winamp 3 is a very nice piece of software, it's just inferior to it's predecessor. I'm sure that will change in following builds of the software. If it played Divx files, it would be superior to Windows Media Player in almost every way.
Question
alexchu2643
Which do you prefer, Winamp 2.8 or Winamp 3?
I personally find Winamp 3 to be slow, and overly complicated for the features it has. The cross-fader in the early Winamp 3 betas was the only feature I genuinely liked, but that feature was added into WinAmp 2, starting at version 2.78.
Don't get me wrong, though, I still think Winamp 3 is a very nice piece of software, it's just inferior to it's predecessor. I'm sure that will change in following builds of the software. If it played Divx files, it would be superior to Windows Media Player in almost every way.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
35 answers to this question
Recommended Posts