comk Posted January 30, 2006 Author Share Posted January 30, 2006 (edited) Your total footprint is affected by food, mobility, shelter and good/services, not where you live..? edit: believe me, i tried changing my country (to US) and my result is even better than what i have now. Edited January 30, 2006 by Kboom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User6060 Posted January 30, 2006 Share Posted January 30, 2006 so what if we'd need 4.8 planets if everyone lived like me, atleast everyone would live the good life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LispyGlitter2 Posted January 30, 2006 Share Posted January 30, 2006 CATEGORY ACRES FOOD 5.9 MOBILITY 2 SHELTER 6.2 GOODS/SERVICES 7.4 TOTAL FOOTPRINT 22 IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON. WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON. IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 4.8 PLANETS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kr0z Posted January 30, 2006 Share Posted January 30, 2006 CATEGORY GLOBAL HECTARES FOOD 2.2 MOBILITY 0.5 SHELTER 1.3 GOODS/SERVICES 1.8 TOTAL FOOTPRINT 5.8 IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 7.6 GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON. WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 1.8 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON. IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 3.2 PLANETS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NikkiRox Posted January 30, 2006 Share Posted January 30, 2006 FOOD 2.8 MOBILITY 0 SHELTER 0.7 GOODS/SERVICES 0.7 TOTAL FOOTPRINT 4.2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt T Posted January 30, 2006 Share Posted January 30, 2006 FOOD 2.8 MOBILITY 0.5 SHELTER 1.1 GOODS/SERVICES 1.6 TOTAL FOOTPRINT 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts