• Sign in to Neowin Faster!

    Create an account on Neowin to contribute and support the site.

Sign in to follow this  

16 years old boy going out with 13 years old girl?

What is your point of view of a 16 years old boy going out with a 13 years old girl?  

715 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Guyro    0

Then that guy should go to jail then...

i think the 14 year old is the boy and the 20 year is the woman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Storm    4

yeah ^ thats what i meant

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
leesmithg    226

Im 16 ( bday was wednesday) my gf is 14 i know some people have a problem with that but no one will come and tell me it to my face! I love her, she loves me, whats the problem?

eh, as i understood: there is no upper age limit for sex with males, so a 20 yr old could be ****ing a 14 year old, legally!

What planet are you on?

The law states quite clearly that it's illegal to participate for heterosexuals and lesbians under the age of 16, if they are male or female.

I will not get in an argument about Lesbians as I know technically it's not classed as sexual intercourse or defined as sex.

Thats for another thread.

I think the law on buggery was lowered to 18 by this government. That applies to males and females.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
brianhanson37    0

If thats what they want I would just let them be. If your talking about a age difference there was a girl I knew (14) Who was going out with a guy who is 19 or 20. Around there. Now thats a pretty big difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Julius Caro    55

16-13 is too young ... I mean, and those early ages people's there are a LOT of "mental/physical" differences between people. 16-19, 16-20, 17-22... those things are different since both are "adults".

But 16-13... I dont think so

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Neil    3

16-13 is too young ... I mean, and those early ages people's there are a LOT of "mental/physical" differences between people. 16-19, 16-20, 17-22... those things are different since both are "adults".

But 16-13... I dont think so

I agree with that and I knew a boy that was 16 going out going with a 12/13 year old I most people thought it was wrong and they were breaking the law.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Echilon    1

I'm 22 and went out with a 17 year old earlier this year.

It seems this thread is contentious because the guy is over the age of consent but the girl isn't. That doesn't mean they're going to do anything stupid. If they're both okay with it and they don't break any laws there's no problem.

That's different. Dating a 16 year old when you're 13 is both illegal and IMO sick. Once you get to ~17 most people have stopped growing. At 13 she's still a child.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bahiatronic    0

And think in a different way. Imagine you as a parent. will you allow your child (who is 13 years old) going out with a 16 years old. If you will ok.. then that's fine. however i am sure most parent will disagree about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
CitizenSmif    0

Acceptable, definately.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Diffused Mind    0

It's not acceptable.

The girl is underaged, not saying they have had sexual intercourse, if they have the boy should charged with being a paedophile and rape.

Far too many underaged girls in Britain are having children and the law is doing zip about it. :no:

:crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:

So even though they might not have had sex, he should be charged with rape?

Wow, quit snorting blocks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Brandon    298

Acceptable. One of the girls I like is turning 14 in a few weeks and I am 16 right now.. It all depends on who she is and all. Shes one of the funniest girls ive met and always cheers me up so..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Laura    146

What planet are you on?

The law states quite clearly that it's illegal to participate for heterosexuals and lesbians under the age of 16, if they are male or female.

I will not get in an argument about Lesbians as I know technically it's not classed as sexual intercourse or defined as sex.

Thats for another thread.

I think the law on buggery was lowered to 18 by this government. That applies to males and females.

I believe it was lowered to 16 to bring it in line with heterosexual laws, as it were.

I think it would be wrong in most cases. The difference between 13 and 16 is huge. I think expecting under 16s to remain 100% virginal and non-sexual is preposterous with all those very adult hormones but it is a FACT that most under 16s are not out there f***ing all day long.

Obviously the average 13 year old is alot more naive and vulnerable than the average 16 year old though and could be far too easy to pressure or manipulate.

It could be acceptable in some circumstances though. For example, if they grew up living next door to each other, good friends for years, parents all know each other, both mature enough not to do something stupid and both fairly serious.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
wetlegs6    0

I thnik its fine

Im 16 and I was going out with a 14yr old until recently - its no problem.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sn00pie    2

I'd never let me daughter date anyone more than one year older than her, 16 is the age where all you want to do is get inside the girls pants, at 13 she has no idea what are a real relationship is.

I'd agree with something like 16-18 because at that age you know what's best for you. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tomi    0

Acceptable, but still slightly iffy. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Subfusion    0

I wouldn't do it, when I was 16 I'd never go out with a 13 year old unless she looked 16 or acted 16.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Allan    33

If no sex, then I said accetable.

Canada had at one point, 12yrs as "age of sexual consent" it's been bumped to 14, and people are lobbying for it to be pushed back to 16.

Also in Canada it's three yrs ... 14 and 17 ok, 15 and 18 ok. 16 and 19 not ok (19yr old would be tried most likely for stat. rape) 17-20 frowned on by most.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
leesmithg    226

I believe it was lowered to 16 to bring it in line with heterosexual laws, as it were.

I was unsure hence putting 18.

When I was younger it was 21.

So if it's 16 it must have been tories lowered it to 18 then the socialists to 16.

I think they also lowered lesbians from 18 to 16.

I am still not going to change my mind on underaged sex.

We as homo spaiens are supposed to be forward thinking not lowering ourselves into prehistoric thinking.

There are too many unwanted children and abortions going on without encouraging underaged sexual intercourse.

Thats why we have this chav problem, too many young girls having kids and fathers that could not give a hoot.

You wannabee a dad at 16 go for it, make sure I and the other tax payers don't have to pay for you and you have a job that can support a child in school and a child in nursery.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
User6060    351

I guess its acceptable for now but I worried that when he's 18 she'll only be 15 :x

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Brandon    298

I'd never let me daughter date anyone more than one year older than her, 16 is the age where all you want to do is get inside the girls pants, at 13 she has no idea what are a real relationship is.

I'd agree with something like 16-18 because at that age you know what's best for you. :)

again all depends on the guy too. Ive never had a realationship before and wouldnt want it for that

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rix    3

Hell nah.

I'm 15 and i wouldnt go out with a 13 y/o no matter how old she acted/looked

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MrKuro    0

From my point of view it is totally wrong . . think about it 16yr (you able to get your drivers license) . . 13yr (you are just barely in junior high) . . nuff said. I'm not saying 3yrs difference is too large (30yrs vs 27yrs . . no big deal) , but at this age, the mentality and other differences are too great. :no:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
vipwoody    1

Yeah, to me I think it's normal.

but, both of their parent's should know what is happening on daily basis.

thank you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
leesmithg    226

So even though they might not have had sex, he should be charged with rape?

Wow, quit snorting blocks.

Why you being a plank.

I don't know if they have or not.

I won't accuse someone without evidence.

I was 16 once, 21 years ago.

I know that period is like on-heat time drastically on-heat time.

I know boys my age that were knocking up 13,14,15 year old girls.

If these boys want relationships then they should find girls their own age.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lowdar    0

I have left school now, but for the last two years at school a girl named Sarah in my class had been dating and have sex with a guy who was 32. :x

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.