PL_ Veteran Posted July 5, 2006 Veteran Share Posted July 5, 2006 http://www.bungie.net/Forums/posts.aspx?po...stRepeater1-p=1 aight. so we all know cortana says "this is how the world ends." well she's right. we can all safely assume that the ONLY way cheif is gonna save the galaxy is to let halo activate. ITS LOSE-LOSE SITUATION: think about it: MC stops the prophet of truth from activating halo and killing us all right? game over and we're safe right? wrong. Cheif stops halo= flood taking over the galaxy anyway. I literally was just sitting here at work, wasting company time at the computer waiting for 5:00 when it just dawned on me. THERE IS NO WAY MASTER CHEIF CAN SAVE US THIS TIME. if he stops truth, there is still no stopping the flood. remember that at the end of halo 2, gravemind took over high charity and installation 05 (delta halo) he also has the prophet of regret, so he knows all of the covenants secrets, except the ones that Truth is hiding. therefore, he has ships, bodies, the technology, and even installation 05. he's gonna come after cheif, no matter where he goes. thus, the only way for there to be a happy ending is ONE POSSIBLE SCENARIO: the earth, or at least some part of it, is the ARK. think: itll only be a happy ending when the flood is gone, as well as the covenant right? well say cheif gets rid of the covenant. the ONLY way to save humanity is to ACTIVATE HALO AND CLEANSE THE GALAXY. otherwise, game over. feedback plz What do you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daxbash5000 Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 why couldn't master cheif just takeon the entire flood by himself! GUNS BLAZING! That's the only way to win! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
velocity3k Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 It's been a long time since i played Halo 2 but if i remember correctly; MC could stop Truth, convince the covenant of the error of their ways with the aid of the Arbiter, join forces with the covenant and then take on the flood in a galaxy wide war. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asahoshi - the otaku Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 forming an alliance with the cov seems kinda off to me atleast for the 3rd game. halo 3 is meant to be a conclusion....if they went that route it opens up for an additional trilogy of games....or leaves open for the halo movies. i have to say i do like the doomsday idea even if it makes the actions of the MC completly pointless lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew Lyle Global Moderator Posted July 5, 2006 Global Moderator Share Posted July 5, 2006 i think master chief should just let everything blow up.. and stop this everybody all together :) halo 3 should be awesome, i beat halo 1 and 2, but i don't remember the story line too well, it was just so long and confusing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ahhell Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 i think master chief should just let everything blow up.. and stop this everybody all together :) halo 3 should be awesome, i beat halo 1 and 2, but i don't remember the story line too well, it was just so long and confusing. read some of the books....it will make more sense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DELTETHISACCOUNT Posted July 6, 2006 Share Posted July 6, 2006 Look, Bungie controls the story, we don't. They could just say the flood died and you'll go with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pajter Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 I'm pretty positive about the doomsday scenario. Seems like a great, or at least spectacular ending to one of the best video games (stories) ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mail Posted July 27, 2006 Share Posted July 27, 2006 Or they might discover a way to stop flood or find a new source of food ... like muffins :shiftyninja: ... as the other guy said bungie controls the story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BajiRav Posted July 27, 2006 Share Posted July 27, 2006 Look, Bungie controls the story, we don't. They could just say the flood died and you'll go with it. :laugh: how true! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PL_ Veteran Posted July 28, 2006 Author Veteran Share Posted July 28, 2006 Or they might discover a way to stop flood or find a new source of food ... like muffins :shiftyninja: ... as the other guy said bungie controls the story. Muffins. Because Halo isn't actually a superweapon, it's a bakery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xerxes Posted July 28, 2006 Share Posted July 28, 2006 I don't think letting the rings activate will completely stop the flood now, the Forerunners needed 7 installations to "cleanse" the galaxy the first time, now 1 is destroyed and another comprimised, meaning even if they do activate them only 5 will fire..sure you can argue that maybe the Forerunners overkilled the amount of installations needed and 5 is enough, but no one knows for sure. Now going by the trailer we know that something big is gonna happen, the fact that Halo 3 is the final chapter and the fact Cortana says in the trailer "this is how the world ends"...now this is just a huge stab in the dark but I think the rings do get activated cause it is currently the only known (and working) way to stop the flood (and possibly as a result of Earth been or is part of the arc, gets destroyed)...the thing is (and I think the flood also know this too) the rings won't completely do thier job, so the flood (and the human and covenant forces) could hide in these "voids" in the coverage area, enabling them to survive the blast. Then perhaps after the blast the remaining human/covenant forces band together to fight the surviving flood (cause remember the rings don't kill the flood, it only kills thier food so while most of the flood will die of starvation many will try to get to the pockets where there is food) and rebuild thier civilizations...just an idea, I'm sure there are plenty of flaws in it, just thought I'd share it with everyone anyway :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
levianthen Posted July 28, 2006 Share Posted July 28, 2006 was that in english? cause i've only played half of the first halo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xerxes Posted July 28, 2006 Share Posted July 28, 2006 was that in english? cause i've only played half of the first halo if you were refering to what I said, it is probally part in jiberish :blush: :laugh: however, things will become a little clearer as you progress through the game. It is also recommended that you read the books as well (that been Halo: The Fall of Reach, Halo: The Flood and Halo: First Strike) to give you a clearer picture (I'm currently reading the second book, damn can't get enough Halo :D) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo003 Posted July 28, 2006 Share Posted July 28, 2006 Didn't cortona said she can blow up the reactor of halo installation if it's necessory and that's the reason she stayed there in the first place. So on earth MC stop the convenant and cortona blow up halo. Bada bing bada BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
golazo Posted July 28, 2006 Share Posted July 28, 2006 and this is where my chuck norris and jackie chan fighting alongside master chief story in halo 3 comes in! :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WooSH Posted July 28, 2006 Share Posted July 28, 2006 or he can just ask james bond lol. i dont no the story line but i just play multiplayer with my friends some times Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GNRambo Posted August 5, 2006 Share Posted August 5, 2006 According to the books, If im not mistaken (i probably am) there are about half a dozen spartans left from the spartan II project. They are all staying with Dr. Halsey. Which means, that chief can stop truth, while the other spartans fight back the flood. It would be cool if we are able to play other spartans in halo 3, which could open the possibility of online storyline campaign. (Play with your friends) But that only what i wish, i doubt that will happen. Oh well, Oly Oly Oxen Free [if you read the books, you'd understand] :happy: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
golazo Posted August 6, 2006 Share Posted August 6, 2006 or he can just ask james bond lol. i dont no the story line but i just play multiplayer with my friends some times lol yeh same, i played single player about 3 times and never payed attention to it.. just shot what ever got in my way and tore **** up with the warthog lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DELTETHISACCOUNT Posted August 6, 2006 Share Posted August 6, 2006 According to the books, If im not mistaken (i probably am) there are about half a dozen spartans left from the spartan II project. They are all staying with Dr. Halsey. Which means, that chief can stop truth, while the other spartans fight back the flood. It would be cool if we are able to play other spartans in halo 3, which could open the possibility of online storyline campaign. (Play with your friends) But that only what i wish, i doubt that will happen. Oh well, Oly Oly Oxen Free [if you read the books, you'd understand] :happy: I vote for a female Spartan accomplice! Screw Arbiter. Honestly, I think they could've pulled off an online campaign mode for Halo 2. If they can do it for MMORPG's, then I know they can do it for shooters. Either: 1) The technology was too much and not possible at the time (2004) or 2) Bungie worked so hard putting so much content in Halo 2 that they had only had 4kb of disc space left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GNRambo Posted August 6, 2006 Share Posted August 6, 2006 I vote for a female Spartan accomplice! Screw Arbiter. Honestly, I think they could've pulled off an online campaign mode for Halo 2. If they can do it for MMORPG's, then I know they can do it for shooters. Either: 1) The technology was too much and not possible at the time (2004) or 2) Bungie worked so hard putting so much content in Halo 2 that they had only had 4kb of disc space left. :D The only female spartans i can think of right now are Linda, and Kelly [Think kelly might be dead] Anyways, i would also like to see the use of a combat knife that they talked about in the books. Its basically Energy Sword for humans :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starmatrix Posted August 6, 2006 Share Posted August 6, 2006 According to the books, If im not mistaken (i probably am) there are about half a dozen spartans left from the spartan II project. They are all staying with Dr. Halsey. Which means, that chief can stop truth, while the other spartans fight back the flood. It would be cool if we are able to play other spartans in halo 3, which could open the possibility of online storyline campaign. (Play with your friends) But that only what i wish, i doubt that will happen. Oh well, Oly Oly Oxen Free [if you read the books, you'd understand] :happy: reading books based on a video game?...reading books is fine, and so is playing video games...but reading a book based around one? the words "sad", "a", "bit", and "little" suddenly spring to one's mind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deaf Spacker Posted August 6, 2006 Share Posted August 6, 2006 reading books based on a video game?...reading books is fine, and so is playing video games...but reading a book based around one? the words "sad", "a", "bit", and "little" suddenly spring to one's mind Go back to your cave. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiger.Girl Posted August 7, 2006 Share Posted August 7, 2006 http://www.bungie.net/Forums/posts.aspx?po...stRepeater1-p=1 What do you think? I think they arent stupid enough to come right out and say how the game is going to end a year b4 its out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starmatrix Posted August 7, 2006 Share Posted August 7, 2006 Go back to your cave. cave ey? i was only expressing my opinion. A good friend of mine is obsessed with the game and has even gone so far as to read one of these "books", and rest assured i wasted no time in expressing my opinion to him. he didnt get offended though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts