rlculver Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 Hi, I have a Canon PowerShot A80 and are thinking of getting a Digital SLR. Which of the two cameras are best for some 'Point & Shoot' and which have the better cost effective features? Well worth upgrading from a PowerShot A80? Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoiN Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 Cannon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saxondale. Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 You're telling me that you are considering these to do some point & shoot? or have i misunderstood... D80 gets my vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turkishdelight Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 Being a Canon user, I tried out the XTi and found the interface easy to get used to after years of A95 and A70. It uses Compactflash cards, so you won't have to buy new memory cards. The D80 has a lot going for it as well, but keep in mind that it uses different media. Both companies have a wide range of lenses, so consider the cost-effectiveness and availability of other lenses (Nikon usually cheaper, Canon usually more available). Overall, if you're looking for more of an SLR "upgrade" from a P&S, then go with the XTi. If you have the time to get used to a new system, get the D80. Either way, you won't feel bad about it. They're basically equal, just interface/etc. preferences get in the way. Try them out at a local store. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sanctified Veteran Posted October 15, 2006 Veteran Share Posted October 15, 2006 As a photographer I must say: Canon lenses are more available, Nikon lenses are better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pink Floyd Veteran Posted October 16, 2006 Veteran Share Posted October 16, 2006 The only sentence I say for everyone: "Try them in your hands" They are same technology and awesome cameras As for myself, I have the D80 and D50 as backup and damn I love it :punk: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hez Posted October 17, 2006 Share Posted October 17, 2006 If you have used canon for years, I think you should still using canon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pink Floyd Veteran Posted October 17, 2006 Veteran Share Posted October 17, 2006 If you have used canon for years, I think you should still using canon. He used a P&S so it doesn't matter now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turkishdelight Posted October 18, 2006 Share Posted October 18, 2006 He used a P&S so it doesn't matter now. Remember, Canon is careful to keep most interface elements (at least the various buttons' names) consistent across their entire line of products. There's something about a product that just feels right if you're used to doing something a certain way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pink Floyd Veteran Posted October 20, 2006 Veteran Share Posted October 20, 2006 Remember, Canon is careful to keep most interface elements (at least the various buttons' names) consistent across their entire line of products. There's something about a product that just feels right if you're used to doing something a certain way. It's a personal preference. I still think it doesnt matter, you get used to it easily Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SamNeeds Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 Well, I originally had the 400D pinned down as they one I'd upgrade to from the 350D, but after readig a new review of it over at dpreview.com, I think I'd go for the D80 instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pink Floyd Veteran Posted October 25, 2006 Veteran Share Posted October 25, 2006 Well, I originally had the 400D pinned down as they one I'd upgrade to from the 350D, but after readig a new review of it over at dpreview.com, I think I'd go for the D80 instead. Good boy good boy :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SamNeeds Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 Thank you PF..."Come over to the dark side!"...well, your signature is dark? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6785077276 Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 I have a Canon A620 P&S then I bought a Canon 400D. ISO 1600 is very noise free, it rocks! Canon DSLRs are the best when it comes to noise at high ISOs due to its CMOS sensor, although Nikon is just as good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prizo Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 I'd go with the Nikon. Both are great cameras and both will fulfill your artistic needs, but I find the Canons to feel cheap. There seems to be more Canon lenses on the 2nd hand market tho. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pink Floyd Veteran Posted October 26, 2006 Veteran Share Posted October 26, 2006 Thank you PF..."Come over to the dark side!"...well, your signature is dark? too dark? I took the picture from nikon website.Unless my monitor is screwed, it looks ok to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6785077276 Posted October 26, 2006 Share Posted October 26, 2006 too dark? I took the picture from nikon website.Unless my monitor is screwed, it looks ok to me My LCD monitor has been calibrated using Spyder and all I see in your sig is the top part of the camera, I can't see the lens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madcappp Posted October 26, 2006 Share Posted October 26, 2006 My LCD monitor has been calibrated using Spyder and all I see in your sig is the top part of the camera, I can't see the lens. You're not supposed to see the lense, it's supposed to look mysterious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6785077276 Posted October 27, 2006 Share Posted October 27, 2006 You're not supposed to see the lense, it's supposed to look mysterious. Oh right, I was just wondering how it was meant to look. Thanks :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cacoe Posted October 27, 2006 Share Posted October 27, 2006 I had a D100 at the moment which is clearly beside the point. BUT... I have two cheap lenses for it, the 50mm 1.8 and the 18-55mm 3.5-5.6 and compared to my friend who has similar lenses for his 350D, they are built a LOT better and the pictures are considerably crisper. I say if you're going to end up buying new lenses at any point, get the nikon because their cheaper lenses beat canon's easily. edit: LOL at the signature thing, I have my screen calibrated with a huey and thought the same thing :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pink Floyd Veteran Posted October 27, 2006 Veteran Share Posted October 27, 2006 haha ok ok. Since I took the picture from nikon's website itself, I was sure the WB was good and no you are not supposed to see any lens :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madcappp Posted October 28, 2006 Share Posted October 28, 2006 http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/compare_po...80&show=all That is a side by side comparison that might help you out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kerm Posted October 28, 2006 Share Posted October 28, 2006 Down to personal preference. I'd go for the 400. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ace1nos Posted October 28, 2006 Share Posted October 28, 2006 I'm a Canon user in the market for an upgrade too and after a lot of research I've decided on a Nikon. I HAVE felt the various cameras in my hand and Nikons always seem to feel more solid (if a little heavier also) - even the shutter sounds nicer on Nikons. That said, in this particular case I might consider the Canon. CF is the only way to go and Canon do make more affordable lenses. If you were thinking about a Nikon D200 then I would encourage you all the way - it's the best value camera ever. If you plan to upgrade to prosumer SLRs down the road then may I advise you stay away from EF-S / DX lenses because otherwise when you upgrade your body they'll be useless. It's generally recommended that you choose a manufacturer and stick with it - I'd agree in which case I'd put my loyalty with Nikon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6785077276 Posted October 29, 2006 Share Posted October 29, 2006 I agree, it's better to stick with EF lenses as they will work on both a full frame and aps-c sized sensor camera. I'm a Canon user in the market for an upgrade too and after a lot of research I've decided on a Nikon.I HAVE felt the various cameras in my hand and Nikons always seem to feel more solid (if a little heavier also) - even the shutter sounds nicer on Nikons. That said, in this particular case I might consider the Canon. CF is the only way to go and Canon do make more affordable lenses. If you were thinking about a Nikon D200 then I would encourage you all the way - it's the best value camera ever. If you plan to upgrade to prosumer SLRs down the road then may I advise you stay away from EF-S / DX lenses because otherwise when you upgrade your body they'll be useless. It's generally recommended that you choose a manufacturer and stick with it - I'd agree in which case I'd put my loyalty with Nikon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts