Recommended Posts

From what I understand you need at least a 40" TV to take advantage of 1080P.

Ahh so 720p is true HD then just the resolution for smaller sizes? Just i dont want to fork out the money and find out I will need 1080 in the future or its not as good quality.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/515150-720-vs-1080/#findComment-588074058
Share on other sites

1080p is more detailed then 720p but with a smaller set it would definitely be less noticeable. 720p is still HD and still looks nice. I still have yet to see a 1080p screen in action only 720p/1080i.

a BB in my area had a Blu ray player on a 40" LCD running 1080p.... ::in Borat's voice:: wowwee!

as mentioned earlier though... 1080p really only shines on the bigger screens.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/515150-720-vs-1080/#findComment-588079670
Share on other sites

a BB in my area had a Blu ray player on a 40" LCD running 1080p.... ::in Borat's voice:: wowwee!

as mentioned earlier though... 1080p really only shines on the bigger screens.

I believe that's "wowaweewa" :p

On a more serious note, you can certainly input a 1080p signal to your TV but you need a TV that supports 1920x1080 resolution in order to actually display the signal.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/515150-720-vs-1080/#findComment-588079671
Share on other sites

a BB in my area had a Blu ray player on a 40" LCD running 1080p.... ::in Borat's voice:: wowwee!

as mentioned earlier though... 1080p really only shines on the bigger screens.

We had the Samsung Blu-Ray player hooked upto a 40" Samsung 1080p, it was spectacular! :|

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/515150-720-vs-1080/#findComment-588079805
Share on other sites

FullHD is 1080p nothing else. And the "FullHD" is a marketing name that Sony stick to their 1080p TV. I'm not sure if other brand use the "FullHD" name.

But HDTV can be 720p, 1080i or 1080p. If your TV can only do 720p, everything above that will be downscaled to 720p. You will loose some details, but it's not that bad.

And 1080 on a 32" HDTV would be, IMO, pointless because the set is too small to see all the details anyway.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/515150-720-vs-1080/#findComment-588080525
Share on other sites

Well, I output a 1080i signal from my HD sat receiver to my LCD (which is 720p native), and I like it better than the 720 output. That's more of a subjective thing, I think.

Actually, it's going to probably come down to the comparison of the scaler in the sat. box and the TV set. Most TV's are going to have better scalers than the cable/sat boxes will, so letting the TV do the scaling work will usually yield better results.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/515150-720-vs-1080/#findComment-588081696
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • "Of course the easiest solution is to switch to uBlock Origin Lite if you want to remain on Chrome, as it is MV3-based, but from our experience, uBO Lite does not seem to be as good as the original non-Lite version" In my experience uBlock Origin Lite does the job for normal everday home users. When they kill that we get to watch Firefox and Brave get a boost in user market share.
    • Block by DNS ad blocker! I dare you! I will even layer unlock Origin, on top of my internal DNS, if I need to and I don’t even block ads today (I really should but this type of behavior makes me angry). I suppose I could also just be lazy, and add the flags myself, back to each release (it wouldn’t be that difficult).
    • Wonder what MPs have ties to these privacy/verification/data harvesting companies that are going to step in this time. Last time under the Tories half the cabinet had fingers in the pies, heck even the PM and his wife at the time was working for silicon valley, probably made a fortune.
    • Google Chrome is killing all uBlock Origin bypasses, Microsoft Edge, Opera to follow by Sayan Sen For a while now the transition away from Manifest V2 (MV2) to MV3 has been on-going and it looks like it is entering its final phase of deprecation, at least, in the case of Google Chrome. A recent discussion thread in the w3c WebExtensions Community Group GitHub repo has highlighted how the latest and upcoming versions of the most popular browser are expected to be its final releases with support for MV2 extensions. Chromium contributor Andrey Bershanskiy shared details about recent Chromium changes and according to comments from Google engineer Devlin Cronin, Chrome has now started removing the flags that previously controlled MV2 availability. kExtensionManifestV2Disabled, the Chromium feature flag that allowed controlled disabling of MV2 add-ons, is now completely removed, which means you will likely no longer find uBlock Origin in your browser extensions list. He wrote: "The kExtensionManifestV2Disabled feature has been default-enabled for over a year. Remove the feature and the effectively-dead code. ... Any tests that relied on being in the "warning" phase (i.e., with the kExtensionManifestV2Disabled) for their sole behavior testing are removed, since this stage is no longer reachable." Cronin further explained why MV2 extensions are no longer allowed in supported Chrome versions as maintaining the associated functionality indefinitely is no longer possible. He cited growing technical difficulties and implementation complexities as well as security concerns. He wrote: "MV2 extensions are no longer allowed in any supported version of Chrome, and we are removing support for them and the associated functionality. We won't be able to provide / maintain this functionality indefinitely due to the complexity and tech debt, as well as the security risks it entails (we've actually found a number of bugs that are specific to MV2 lately). Of course, other browsers can continue supporting these if they so desire. Unfortunately, we won't be putting code behind a compilation flag ... We won't be removing all the MV2 code wholesale right away, so many of these things will continue working for awhile (but they will go away eventually, and some may go away sooner than others)." What this essentially means is that the tricks and bypasses that were used to keep MV2 extensions like uBlock Origin and others alive will not work any more on Chrome, or at least not for very long. For example the Windows Registry mod that could extend MV2 availability will cease to function after Chromium version 151. Here is a rundown of the changes coming in the final such releases of Chromium releases: Chromium 150 lost ExtensionManifestV2Disabled option Chromium 151 will loose ExtensionManifestV2Unsupported option Chromium 151 will loose ExtensionManifestV2Availability option Chromium 151 will likely loose AllowLegacyMV2Extensions option Other Chromium-based browsers like Opera and Microsoft Edge could soon follow suit too. Although it is not specified, Edge began disabling uBlock Origin back in February, and Opera could also stop the functioning of MV2 add-ons, even though it had committed to support MV2 for longer in October 2024. uBlock Origin developer Raymond Hill (gorhill) apparently stated the following: "For Opera I did submit 1.70.0 rather late, but this was weeks ago. A while ago I received an email from Opera that they plan to abandon MV2-based extension so maybe they are no longer allocating resources for reviewing such extensions." The email which developers like Gorhill mentions was received from Opera last year. Here is what it seemingly said: Hence for now the only Chromium browser that seems to be on-board fully with MV2 support is Brave, and perhaps Vivaldi as well. Meanwhile if you want to ditch Chromium browsers entirely then Mozilla Firefox is an excellent alternative as MV3 and MV2 are both supported. Of course the easiest solution is to switch to uBlock Origin Lite if you want to remain on Chrome, as it is MV3-based, but from our experience, uBO Lite does not seem to be as good as the original non-Lite version. Source: w3C (GitHub repo) As an online publication, Neowin too relies on ads for operating costs and, if you use an ad blocker, we'd appreciate being whitelisted. In addition, we have an ad-free subscription for $28 a year, which is another way to show support!
    • Write to your MP 😄 Like believing in Santa. Total surveillance IS the goal. Wake up.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      skylerssviv earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      mobmobiles earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      219
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      92
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      82
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!