random Posted December 29, 2006 Share Posted December 29, 2006 Is there a difference in terms of security between maxthon vs firefox? Is one say more secure than the other when surfing the net? I made the switch to firefox about a year ago because I percieved it be more secure (not really sure why) but might make the switch back as firefox is still really lacking some key elements that just make my browsing a little more painful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
primexx Posted December 29, 2006 Share Posted December 29, 2006 Maxthon is just an IE shell and as such is just as vulnerable as IE, not to mention it's also just as backward as IE in terms of rendering capability. Firefox is still much more secure than MSIE, even the latest update, and also what part of Firefox do you not like? There is most likely an extension that would fix your problem. That's the beauty of Firefox: you can customise the hell out of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
random Posted December 29, 2006 Author Share Posted December 29, 2006 for one the drag & go addons aren't that great super drag & go (i think that's what it's called) isn't supported anymore drag de go does searches if you drag a link that doesn't have www in front of it its that one that mostly bugs me, i can't think of more off the top of my head Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SunnyB Posted December 29, 2006 Share Posted December 29, 2006 Compared to Max, Firefox is a POS, IMHO. When I last used FF the main directory was 30+ MB's plus the profile folder was near 100 MB's. Maxthon takes less than 15 MB's and doesn't have a seperate profiles folder in Docs and Settings. Firefox is slower than Max because Max uses the core trident engine in Windows. In many cases, adding a new extension to FF will destroy your profile, with Max that doesn't happen. Max is just as secure as you make it. Your firewall and anti-virus are the determining factor there. There are exploits for the gecko engine just as there are for the trident engine. Your decision to use one or the other is one you should make based on your own experience. Don't depend on the advise of others regarding your security. There are too many fanboys on both teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matty13 Posted December 29, 2006 Share Posted December 29, 2006 I Would say Maxthon is just if you want more features in your browser, If you want better security and good features too then use Opera or Firefox :) Simple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genius Posted December 29, 2006 Share Posted December 29, 2006 i used maxthon for some time, but IE core kind of scared me, so I'm back to Firefox and Opera, using both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Decryptor Veteran Posted December 29, 2006 Veteran Share Posted December 29, 2006 Compared to Max, Firefox is a POS, IMHO. When I last used FF the main directory was 30+ MB's plus the profile folder was near 100 MB's. Maxthon takes less than 15 MB's and doesn't have a seperate profiles folder in Docs and Settings. ... In many cases, adding a new extension to FF will destroy your profile, with Max that doesn't happen. ... The profile folder stores your cache, so to be fair when counted Maxthon you should include the IE temporary internet files folder. And Maxthon stores it's info in the registry, the way Firefox works is kinda better (case in point, i just installed a new main HD, i just had to drag a single folder over to have all my settings, extensions, etc. back) And i have only ever had a extension kill a profile once (Piggy Bank), i have been going back and forward with the same profile between different versions of Firefox (e.g. 1.0 and 1.5, 1.5 and 2.0, 2.0 and 3.0) and haven't had any problems. But... as you said, it's up to the user, use whatever you like more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
linx05 Posted December 29, 2006 Share Posted December 29, 2006 Actually Maxthon stores all its info into .ini files. So it can too be copy/pasted from another hard drive/zip file etc etc. People can go on and on about security but in my opinion, it lies in the hands of the person sitting in front of the computer. I've used Maxthon for years now and I don't remember getting any viruses/spyware/etc while using it. Also, Maxthon has its own security precautions. That being said, Maxthon 2.0 installs its own patches from its servers which can be enabled/disabled in the option menu. See here for a screenshot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Decryptor Veteran Posted December 29, 2006 Veteran Share Posted December 29, 2006 Well that's a good thing (i don't really like the registry) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stunna Posted December 29, 2006 Share Posted December 29, 2006 Actually Maxthon stores all its info into .ini files. So it can too be copy/pasted from another hard drive/zip file etc etc. People can go on and on about security but in my opinion, it lies in the hands of the person sitting in front of the computer. I've used Maxthon for years now and I don't remember getting any viruses/spyware/etc while using it. Also, Maxthon has its own security precautions. That being said, Maxthon 2.0 installs its own patches from its servers which can be enabled/disabled in the option menu. See here for a screenshot. does the latest version of maxthon work well when IE7 is installed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted December 29, 2006 Share Posted December 29, 2006 I Would say Maxthon is just if you want more features in your browser, If you want better security and good features too then use Opera or Firefox :) Simple. i used maxthon for some time, but IE core kind of scared me, so I'm back to Firefox and Opera, using both. or you can use the gecko engine with maxthon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
primexx Posted December 29, 2006 Share Posted December 29, 2006 Compared to Max, Firefox is a POS, IMHO. When I last used FF the main directory was 30+ MB's plus the profile folder was near 100 MB's. Maxthon takes less than 15 MB's and doesn't have a seperate profiles folder in Docs and Settings. Firefox is slower than Max because Max uses the core trident engine in Windows. In many cases, adding a new extension to FF will destroy your profile, with Max that doesn't happen. Max is just as secure as you make it. Your firewall and anti-virus are the determining factor there. There are exploits for the gecko engine just as there are for the trident engine. Your decision to use one or the other is one you should make based on your own experience. Don't depend on the advise of others regarding your security. There are too many fanboys on both teams. like you're not one. :pinch: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ViperAFK Posted December 29, 2006 Share Posted December 29, 2006 I gave maxthon 2.0 a try the other day, the interface is nice and fast, and it was alot of features and is reletively secure for my needs, but firefox's extensibility keeps me hooked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
linx05 Posted December 30, 2006 Share Posted December 30, 2006 does the latest version of maxthon work well when IE7 is installed? Yes very well indeed. I have IE7 installed. I gave maxthon 2.0 a try the other day, the interface is nice and fast, and it was alot of features and is reletively secure for my needs, but firefox's extensibility keeps me hooked. Maxthon 2.0 is very customiseably aswell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
primexx Posted December 30, 2006 Share Posted December 30, 2006 Yes very well indeed. I have IE7 installed. Maxthon 2.0 is very customiseably aswell. oh of course, but it's still not as customizable as Firefox is. Plus the question was in terms of security, and we can all agree that IE is much less secure than Firefox. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts