Do You UAC?


Do You UAC?  

462 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

swgiant

just wonder how many users like or dislike this new technology, UAC.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Sam

I don't use it because I found it annoying, but for less tech-savvy people it is a very good idea (Y)

Link to post
Share on other sites
swgiant

Just wonder, is because development of UAC, then microsoft claims that user is no need to install antivirus again?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Evolution

I hardly ever get bothered by it... So yes I use it for security and like it :) The main problem is that most apps aren't Vista "ready", at most they've just added a patch that only fixes it partially.

BTW <sarcasim>nice UNBIASED poll </sarcasim>

Link to post
Share on other sites
raskren

What a lame poll.

Link to post
Share on other sites
h3xis

I'm not bothered by it. After having to do pretty much the exact same thing in linux for so long I've gotten used to it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
lsdn

Still using it... planning to deactivate it soon

Link to post
Share on other sites
Lant

No, I got fed up when I was renaming and reorganising my start menu

Link to post
Share on other sites
Dashel

^That was the straw that broke for me as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites
scumdogmillionaire

I tried. I really, really tried. But things like Windows OneCare elevation to allow a program through the firewall broke me.

Turned it off several weeks ago.

Link to post
Share on other sites
bobbba

disabling the secure desktop switching made it more bearable for me.

Link to post
Share on other sites
0sit0

I have it on... doesnt bother me at all

Link to post
Share on other sites
LewisBraid

i turned it off straightaway! its so damn annoying. its a good system but not for me.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Aero Ultimate

It was very annoying in RC2, and as it seems the same in Rtm, it's quite likely that I will get fed up and turn it off.

It's only for n00bs anyway, to keep them safe of the consequences of stupid things like clickig on attachments in unrequested emails.

If you've got some common sense, you should do well without it.

btw: XP-Rtm, don't you think you should rename yourself to Vista-Rtm? :laugh:

Link to post
Share on other sites
Mike E

I have it on and it doesn't annoy me

Link to post
Share on other sites
Phalesafe

Its so frustrating I had to disable it on the workstations my co-workers are using. Let alone me having to remove it :laugh: Wish there was a complete option of removal under add/remove programs.

Link to post
Share on other sites
noroom
BTW <sarcasim>nice UNBIASED poll </sarcasim>

[sarcasm]nice CORRECT spelling[/sarcasm]

Link to post
Share on other sites
xxdesmus

Hell no.

It is the FIRST thing I turned off after every re-installation (during beta testing).

Link to post
Share on other sites
raskren
It was very annoying in RC2, and as it seems the same in Rtm, it's quite likely that I will get fed up and turn it off.

It's only for n00bs anyway, to keep them safe of the consequences of stupid things like clickig on attachments in unrequested emails.

If you've got some common sense, you should do well without it.

btw: XP-Rtm, don't you think you should rename yourself to Vista-Rtm? :laugh:

Most of these replies are hilarious! Linux users know not to run as "root" all the time and elevate as necessary. Apparently Windows users do not.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Brandon Live

I turn off Secure Desktop, but leave UAC on. In fact, I'm a big fan of UAC - I find it to be a great way to gain control of the privilege level that my applications run with, while being a lot less annoying than using an actual LUA account and having to enter a password all the time.

In my opinion, Secure Desktop is what gives UAC a bad reputation. I won't use it until they make it a less jarring / slow / frustrating experience.

Its so frustrating I had to disable it on the workstations my co-workers are using. Let alone me having to remove it :laugh: Wish there was a complete option of removal under add/remove programs.

Wow. You have no idea how much that angers me. If only those co-workers would blame you and not us for any security problems they may run into because of your recklessness.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Chugworth

I certainly leave it on. I like being able to prevent most applications from making system changes.

The problem with UAC is that most average people will just learn to click continue every time the message comes up. The people who could benefit the most from UAC are the ones that understand what the window means - the ones that are most likely to disable it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest jgrodri

Since I havne't tried vista i can't really pass any judgement, but I was wondering how similar is this to the "authentication required" window in OS X?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Brandon Live
Since I havne't tried vista i can't really pass any judgement, but I was wondering how similar is this to the "authentication required" window in OS X?

Same idea, except in Vista if you are a member of the Administrators group, you don't need to enter a password. You simply have to click "Continue" or "Cancel" to allow the application to run with Admin privileges, which saves time.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest jgrodri

^^^

Then i really don't see how it could be as annoying as people say...

I guess if software was badly designed then you couldn't install anything without admin rights but that is the developers fault, not Microsoft's.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Bubbanoy

I'm so use to doing this on linux too, doesnt really bother me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.