Optimize XP for Dual Core


Recommended Posts

ok. Knew about this before, but after doing this Ad-Aware/Ad-Watch crashed at startup as the new kernel32.dll changed. Performance did seem to increase.

BUT Consider this:

"Note: This solution favors performance gains over power savings. Although benchmark performance scores may improve, battery life could be negatively affected. Accordingly, this kernel policy change may be disabled by a registry key to allow for maximum flexibility." (http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=896256)

Thanks! :cool:

Edited by sputnik18
Hmm. So if I plug a fresh installed XP SP2 PC into the net, download all available updates on WU, then I won't need to apply this fix?

That's absolutely true, you know, those hidden updates MS doesn't release on Windows Update is not there for a reason, perhaps they didn't go through all quality tests since they fix a specific problem for specific segment at a time, or simply MS will incorporate them in a next update or a service pack so they don't bother releasing the current one, and that's exactly the case with this Dual Core/HT patch since it's now included already in a newer update with a newer kernel version.

I'm somewhat confused as to whether I need to or not. I have a Core 2 Duo.

Been reading loads of stuff on the net about it, but the fact is, I can't determine whether or not I need to do some or all of the following:

1. Install KB896256 patch

2. Set "PerfEnablePackageIdle" to 1 in registry

3. Add /usepmtimer to Boot.ini

Do #2 and #3 only, as long as you have installed every WU patch.

And after all, an update will never replace a newer file, so If you try to run the KB896256 update while you don't need it, no damage will happen :)

Speaking about it, this site for example has all KB's fixes MS released for Windows Vista, and most of them are available through direct MS contact only and not via Windows Update:

http://hotfix.xable.net/download/index.php...amp;sort_mode=a

Okay, I just got my AMD 64 4200+ X2 as of today. I am upgrading from AMD 3500+ and to be honest with you, I don't see any real performance gain between 3500+ and 4200+ X2.

I already installed the Drive for X2, M$ hotfix (although I didn't heed the warning not to mix with AMD driver for X2 and M$ hotfix, since it will cause BSOD. However, I haven't encounter any BSOD recently). I also tweaked the registry to gain some performance booast, hardly noticeable I'll say.

I am quite disappointed that I shelled out $180.00 for this CPU. Any advice would be welcomed, and I need to figure out how get rid of those application on the taskbar every time window boots. It loads so slow...

Thanks.

AMD64 4200+ X2

Biostar 6100T

500W Antec PSU

Geforce 7600 GS 512 MB PCI-E x16

3 GB DDR333

500 GB WD

35.7 GB Raptor WD

only performance gain you are going to see is when you play games or something that is taxing on the system. If you are just on msn or going on the net in stuff, you won't notice much of a difference

Can say the same thing when comparing a 700mhz amd-k7 to a core 2 lol.

In there there should be a DWORD called PerfEnablePackageIdle make sure the value = 1. If not, make it say 1. If the key is not there, create it. Right click an area in that box, and go new DWORD. This will increase performance A LOT.

Is that decimal or hexadecimal?

Okay, I just got my AMD 64 4200+ X2 as of today. I am upgrading from AMD 3500+ and to be honest with you, I don't see any real performance gain between 3500+ and 4200+ X2.

I noticed a nice improvement when I went from a 3500+ to the 4200+ dual core, but there is one slight thing. If you just plopped the CPU in and did not bother to reinstall Windows or update the device system to a multiprocessor PC, you will not see any benefits as Windows will still think you are on a single core system. I think forcing the system into system prep will redetect all the hardware, I've honestly never had to do this.

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 5 weeks later...

i have done this on my XP ocmputer but i have lots of PCs still running windows 2000 on dual core (cant switch to XP because of specific software compatibility) Is there a way to optimize dual core for windows 2000? i do see the cpu0 and cpu1 on task manager, but im just not sure if it is optimizing both cores. thanks for any tip. been googling about it for hours now but cant seem to find any optimization for windows 2000. thanks in advance

  • 2 weeks later...
i have done this on my XP ocmputer but i have lots of PCs still running windows 2000 on dual core (cant switch to XP because of specific software compatibility) Is there a way to optimize dual core for windows 2000? i do see the cpu0 and cpu1 on task manager, but im just not sure if it is optimizing both cores. thanks for any tip. been googling about it for hours now but cant seem to find any optimization for windows 2000. thanks in advance

I think you may be SOL on that one.

  • 3 weeks later...

I'm extremely skeptical of this guide.

First, nobody has explained how or why XP is not "optimized" for SMP, how and why Vista is optimized, and the difference between the two. Second, there is absolutely no empirical evidence to back up any of these claims. No benchmarks, no hard numbers or facts. Just things like "Things seem to load faster..." which isn't even indicative of CPU performance.

WTF? Am I the only one that feels this way?

I'm extremely skeptical of this guide.

First, nobody has explained how or why XP is not "optimized" for SMP, how and why Vista is optimized, and the difference between the two. Second, there is absolutely no empirical evidence to back up any of these claims. No benchmarks, no hard numbers or facts. Just things like "Things seem to load faster..." which isn't even indicative of CPU performance.

WTF? Am I the only one that feels this way?

This "dual core" fix is not for improving dual core performance, but for preventing crashes caused by dual core CPUs (mostly from AMD) when they change power-saving states. AKA change their CPU operating frequencies to save power. It does nothing to improve performance, XP already schedules tasks across cores without the fix.

You DO need the fix if you are getting crashes in XP because of your dual core CPU.

As for the difference between Vista and XP, Vista is running so many craplets in the background it needs enhanced dual core support just to run as fast as XP. :| Compare Vista performance on single and multi core CPUs if you think this is a joke.

Here's a good article about what this XP dual core issue is really about:

http://discussions.virtualdr.com/showthread.php?t=195533

Using the AMD driver, then optimiser, and then lastly that reg fix I do seem to be seeing some real increases in speed.

Getting into Windows and then application access is more or less instant where as previously it was taking a few seconds before I could start launching apps, etc.

I also think it has cured a bit of an ongoing performance issue with Test Drive Unlimited so thats a bonus :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • FWIW StatCounter has been trash for over 25+ years! Back in the day (circa 2000 and GeoCities pre-Blogger era), it was useful to paste a number on your webpage indicating how many visitors you had. In the ensuing 25+ years, they've grown in reputation and changed their ways... but their overall consumer value has remained abysmal. Serious marketing agencies only cite StatCounter when there's literally no other sources available to support any marketing claims! They are the absolute lowest threshold serious companies use to push any sort of narrative about this-or-that happening. Besides their credibility being what it is, they are forever subject to quality issues. They're so bad that my DNS-level ad-filter prevents me from even viewing their main website! HA!
    • Microsoft had to shut down 70+ GitHub repos after getting hacked, brings back some by Aditya Tiwari The self-replicating malware campaign known as Miasma took the open-source world by storm. It was reported that almost 73 Microsoft GitHub repositories were infected by the worm and had to be temporarily shut down to determine how attackers compromised projects and stuffed password-stealing malware in the code. These GitHub repos span across different organizations, including Microsoft Azure, Azure-Samples, Microsoft, and MicrosoftDocs. The malware enabled attackers to steal passwords and credentials when compromised tools were opened in popular AI coding apps, including Claude Code, Gemini CLI, VS Code, and Cursor. The security firm Cloudsmith, malware analysis site OpenSourceMalware, and 404 Media were among the first to report the hack. For background, Miasma is a variant of the Mini Shai-Hulud worm, open-sourced by the threat group TeamPCP. It started its journey by compromising a Red Hat employee's GitHub account to attack the @redhat-cloud-services npm namespace. Earlier this month, Microsoft Threat Intelligence reported that the Miasma attackers published 32 malicious packages across more than 90 versions under the @redhat-cloud-services npm scope to steal cloud credentials. The worm didn't take long to start attacking source repos directly rather than package registries. It is known to skip the npm registry entirely for several targets and plant malicious code straight into public repos like "icflorescu/mantine-datatable." The delivery approach was designed to weaponize AI coding tools. Miasma's malicious payload embedded into projects can trigger automatic code execution when the infected repo is opened in an AI coding tool or IDE. The list of affected projects includes "durabletask", a Python package compromised by TeamPCP a month earlier to deliver an information stealer designed for Linux systems. That said, Microsoft has begun restoring some repos affected by the malware campaign, The Hacker News reports. A company spokesperson stated the following: Microsoft will continue to investigate the attack. It has notified a small number of customers who may have removed their content from the affected repos. The company will reach out to customers again through established support channels "if anything further is identified that requires customer action."
    • Why is Opera doing this notification at all? They have their own extension store. They don't have to obey anything dictated by Google. Others like Brave and Vivaldi that rely on Chrome's extension store, not so much. Firefox is entirely separate as well with its own extensions store. I honestly don't understand why entire world is just insisting on Chrome. Like, why? It's a stupid fat browser with barely any functionality. But sure, it's installed on everything by default. I don't understand how people even use web that's filled with tracking garbage and ads all over the place.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rubentuben8 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      ARaclen earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      jojodbn earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      jojodbn earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      jojodbn earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      529
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      231
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      131
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      82
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!