NeoSmart Technologies' ToolTipFixer 1.0.0


Recommended Posts

It happens to everything >.<

The technical explanation is that in the Win32 API, tooltips are coded to have HWND_TOPMOST as their z-index - meaning that they are on top of everything.

However, due to a series (many) (obvious) bugs and miscodings in the Windows Shell, when you perform certain actions with dialogs and Windows that are supposed to appear above current windows (like the context menu when you right click the start menu items) end up coming even above the HWND_TOPMOST entries as well - that's not supposed to happen.

Then it seems (from here on in, i'm only guessing based on what i can see) that the parent window/dialog (in this case, the start menu, then the taskbar) inherits the window status when the child is closed, and keeps it.

Think of it like Dominoes. The first window is made topmost - no problem. as it closes, it's parent takes that z-index. then its parent, and the next, and the next - until you end up with something in the same x-y plane as a HWND_TOPMOST item, and it ends up with a lower z-index; therefore obscuring that item from view.

Basically, it is something that could be avoided by properly handing off z-indexes and keeping these always under HWND_TOPMOST items.

Thanks for the explanation. This had to be one of the most annoying bugs ever in Windows XP.

Just figured out your error, punio4: you don't have the .NET 2.0 Framework installed, do you?

New version out.

Fixes glitch in the uninstall routine

Slightly improved memory management (now running at the bare-minimum really)

Improved (faster) window handling

No more t.txt

You can view full changelog at http://neosmart.net/jira/browse/TTF?report...changelog-panel

Download: http://neosmart.net/dl.php?id=10

If you're upgrading from 1.0.0, it might be a good idea to run this first:

Start -> Run -> CMD.exe

cd "C:\Program Files\NeoSmart Technologies\ToolTipFixer\"
InstallUtil.exe /u ToolTipFixer.exe

If you don't, you'll have to reboot before it will work again. Future upgrades will not need this command.

Cheers!

Hmm. Runs on startup, creates a t.txt in my root, eats up 8 mb of ram, and made an unrecoverable system error after install.

Sorry, but looks rather dangerous.

Also, I don't know since when, but I don't have that problem on my computer. Tried the right click open thingy... Nothing happens.

I thought that its a patch, not something that runs in the background.. Thanks

uninstalled ... i don't think this bug worth 6-8 mb of ram.. slow machine here

I created the problem, as explained in the first post, then downloaded and ran the fix.

Got an error message during install, but rebooted and problem is fixed. Only now I discover Net framework is required, but no species of Net on this machine. Strange.

No other problems as encountered above. XP Pro SP2.

NeoSmart Technologies' ToolTipFixer 1.0.0 is a patch to address this issue that Microsoft refuses to fix: just run the (free, small) patch once, and you're set.
I'm sorry, but from your description I expected it to be a patch, not a process installer.

You should state that this is an installer for a background process that prevents the bug from occuring.

Yeah, you need .NET 2.0 installed.

Only the people with Windows' source code or those that have reverse-engineered Windows can actually patch it; so ToolTipFixer runs in the background (as a service) and intercepts calls for HWND_TOPMOST to circumvent the bug. Sorry if the description was misleading.

Muahahahha this frigging bug is a 14 old bug??? (My computer history at home started in 2003 so I missed a lot)

Like others I think it sucks a bit to have a program 24/24 for this bug, is it possible to fix the bug when it happen manually each time?

If it's possible, you could add an option in the taskbar right click to run the script to fix the bug...

Since it's not a bug that happen every now and then it could be enough.

Its just a small process that runs in the background, guys. You make it seem like it will make your PC run dog slow and consume 200mb of RAM or give you a BSOD.
No, 7MB is not a lot, that for sure. But 7mb just to fix an eventual not constant bug, that's little annoying.

(But it still less than using Vista :p )

lol, so true ;)

Anything sitting in the taskbar will waste that memory too. But what I can do (and will) is create a tiny app that DOESN'T run constantly, and you can create a shortcut in the quicklaunch bar and run it from there whenever you need.

(BTW, 6-7MB is the bare minimum for anything .NET - and that's with tons of pre- and post-build optimizations.

"Why does it have to be .NET" well, it doesn't - but the Windows API has grown appallingly bloated and buggy with all these years so I choose to code in .NET instead)

Anything sitting in the taskbar will waste that memory too. But what I can do (and will) is create a tiny app that DOESN'T run constantly, and you can create a shortcut in the quicklaunch bar and run it from there whenever you need.
Perfect (Y)

I hope you will succeed!

Put both in options at the install. (Automatic Service or Manual Fix)

Then contact Autopatcher team to add that :p

  • 5 months later...

Hi,

Just installed TTF (how friggin' ridiculous that M$ can't fix such a common and irritating bug?) and surprised to see how much memory it's using: 100MB on my machine.

I'm running a fully updated (inc. .NET 2 and 3) WinXP machine. I rebooted to see if that helped, but no.

I see someone else reports 7MB. Any suggestions why mine is so high (although I'm keeping it running even if it does 'cost' 100MB! :)).

Thanks.

There seems to be a bug:

If you leave this tool running and hit Windows+D, it also hides the taskbar. :s

It sometimes happens: if I hit Windows+D and the taskbar still remains, then I click on my desktop and quickly hit Windows+D a couple of times, the taskbar may disappear.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Just pull a 4Chan and ignore the UK gov, or better troll them. It's not like they can enforce the fine across border.
    • It has NEVER been shown that all these overreaching creepy methods of surveillance have ever saved a child or prevented a terrorist attack. Not a single one. It's the kind of people like you who just wave it away as "paranoid conspiracy" that makes big tech and governments this creepy mass data hoarding entities. Not only that, 3/4 of these surveillance ideas undermine the very foundations of safe online communication because they always want to have a backdoor in everything "just in case" they might need it to... checks the notes "save the children". If you put a backdoor into encryption chain there is no encryption chain anymore. You know what encryption keeps safe? Your medical records, your online shopping and credit card during payment, your photos in the cloud, your emails, your passwords, everything. There is ZERO guarantee only the good guys will use it. And if you think police suddenly can't apprehend child abusers because of encryption, Epstein was running his entire sex trafficking ring using GMail which is not even encrypted end to end. Or to make matters even worse, USA has a **** and a good buddy of Epstein as a president. Absolutely NOTHING has been done to address it. Maxwell just got a better "hotel" room as a reward. This clearly shows how they absolutely don't really care about the children but they care about the absolute control over all of us. And you're defending them here. Good grief. On top of constant attempts to insert backdoors into encryption chain, the entire age verification nonsense is again entirely over reaching, creepy, invades everyone's privacy with premise of yet again "protecting the children" instead of demanding device makers to provide simple and powerful tools for PARENTS to control how their children use devices and what they do on them. THIS would be the way, not the stupid age verification for everyone. Imagine if government would be dictating companies how their phones work and not the company's IT department. The parents should be the IT department to their children. And for everyone excusing "they are not knowledgeable enough" buuuuuulsheat. We live in a digital age, if you have children now, you absolutely are well versed in digital everything at least to basic extent. If you're not, how do you even function in these times then? Reality is that parents are just lazy and don't want to deal with this. They want government to raise their kids because they are too busy scrolling stupid Instagram and Tiktok or some bs.
    • You could make the argument that K should not be included, but FC, the fried chicken, is not the framework, it's the product. It's the Paint in Paint.NET. A closer analogy is if KFC included the name of the deep fryer they used. HennyPennyFC.
    • Flying as the central point eh... As a massive Spyro fan who has replayed the Reignited Trilogy three times and the originals 4 times... I have some doubts, but maybe...
    • Apple is expanding Private Cloud Compute beyond its own data centers by Pradeep Viswanathan At WWDC 2026, as part of the improved Apple Intelligence capabilities, Apple today announced that it is expanding Private Cloud Compute (PCC), its privacy-focused cloud infrastructure for Apple Intelligence, beyond its own data centers for the first time. Private Cloud Compute was designed to handle Apple Intelligence requests that are too complex to run fully on-device. The PCC system does not store user data and does not allow Apple or anyone else to access user requests. Last year, Apple also expanded its Security Bounty program with rewards of up to $1 million for researchers who could find serious vulnerabilities in PCC. Until now, Apple's PCC data centers were using Apple's own silicon. As part of the expansion, Apple is working with Google and NVIDIA to run new Apple Intelligence workloads on Google Cloud systems powered by NVIDIA GPUs. Apple will be using this new infrastructure to execute more demanding AI tasks while maintaining the same privacy and security guarantees of PCC. The new implementation uses NVIDIA Confidential Computing with NVIDIA GPUs, Intel CPUs with TDX, and Google’s Titan chip. Apple says it has worked with Google to build additional protections beyond a traditional confidential computing deployment. Despite the expansion to third-party data centers, Apple claims that its core PCC requirements remain unchanged, including stateless computation, no privileged runtime access, non-targetability, and verifiable transparency. The company highlighted that it will continue to control the PCC software stack, and Apple devices will only trust PCC software that has been cryptographically approved by Apple. To take security to the next level, Apple mentioned that it is maintaining an append-only ledger of Google Cloud hardware that is part of the PCC fleet. The company claims this will help reduce the risk of supply chain attacks. In addition to AI infrastructure, Apple also worked with Google to use technologies behind the Gemini family of models to build the next generation of Apple Foundation Models to power Apple Intelligence features across on-device and cloud workloads. As expected, for more demanding AI tasks like agentic tool use and complex reasoning, Apple will rely on the expanded PCC infrastructure running on Google Cloud. The expansion of PCC on Google Cloud will gradually ramp toward the full set of protections during the summer preview period. As before, Apple will also publish binaries for public inspection, provide research tooling, and give researchers access to live PCC nodes in research mode through the Apple Security Bounty Program.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      222
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      92
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      86
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!