Neowin Digital Gallery


 Share

Recommended Posts

Keito

...and not even all of them comment on other pics ;) - oh well, guess that's how it works.

Anyway, HDR is meant to display a high dynamic range in an image, mimicking what the eye would see. The followingpics give you more of an idea to what HDR actually does;

Before;

218187497_41887709c1.jpg

After:

218190288_601a636abb.jpg

Basically, it increases the dynamic range of the image, making the lighting a bit more uniform so to say - which is more or less closer to how we see in comparison to a photocamera.

Most pictures you see on the internet are done with software like photomatix - which can indeed give you great results, but it's somehow particularly bad with blending clouds and gives then a really high contrastlook where the sky turns extremely dark - and I think that's not close to reality, something which HDR should be about; making pictures closer to reality, closer to how we see them ourselves

Link to post
Share on other sites

o0moonman0o

me and my new toy

1485461461_6edea2f9fb.jpg?v=0

Link to post
Share on other sites

Damo R.
1497821009_a2947b0f64_b.jpg
Link to post
Share on other sites

Kerm
...

Yeah, anyway your image looks much better before the HDR effect, much more contrast and more punchy, personally i hate HDR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bubbabyte
...and not even all of them comment on other pics ;) - oh well, guess that's how it works.

Anyway, HDR is meant to display a high dynamic range in an image, mimicking what the eye would see. The followingpics give you more of an idea to what HDR actually does;

Before;

218187497_41887709c1.jpg

After:

218190288_601a636abb.jpg

Basically, it increases the dynamic range of the image, making the lighting a bit more uniform so to say - which is more or less closer to how we see in comparison to a photocamera.

Most pictures you see on the internet are done with software like photomatix - which can indeed give you great results, but it's somehow particularly bad with blending clouds and gives then a really high contrastlook where the sky turns extremely dark - and I think that's not close to reality, something which HDR should be about; making pictures closer to reality, closer to how we see them ourselves

i'm no expert but in my opinion that's a horrible example of hdr.. the after picture looks completely desaturated and blown out. That's NOT how hdr is supposed to look.

Link to post
Share on other sites

crazzy88ss

i second that opinion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

crazzy88ss

trip to Pier 39 at SF earlier this week. If you're looking to shoot birds, that's the place to go.

october1.jpg

october2.jpg

october3.jpg

october4.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

o0moonman0o

shots from testing my new cam

1501923596_060ec64b3e.jpg?v=0

1501059633_e29eaa6a53.jpg?v=0

1501071533_9a6f411d95.jpg?v=0

1501915328_ac7f29308a.jpg?v=0

1501045499_1f857ca83a.jpg?v=0

Link to post
Share on other sites

Budious

PCPhoto Magazine had a nice article on HDR in a recent issue. You can view the low resolutions examples for free at their website. Basically, the use it to expose an exterior view from indoors through kitchen window, then expose to fill the shadows of the interior, and expose to captures the highlights of the interior and merge seven exposures into a final image.

http://www.pcphotomag.com/how-to/image-pro...ombination.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keito
i'm no expert but in my opinion that's a horrible example of hdr.. the after picture looks completely desaturated and blown out. That's NOT how hdr is supposed to look.
i second that opinion.

That IS how HDR is supposed to look (somewhat depending on the definition of HDR, I think 'mine' comes along pretty well here) - HDR is supposed to give you a high dynamic range, to mimic what you actually see. In a lot of shots it doesn't look that spectacular because the shadows have less contrast. This is due to our eyes adjusting to very tiny differences in irradiance, give you more dynamic range - allowing you to see, for example, the inside of a room AND the surroundings through a window.

With a camera you can only set the right exposure for one of these 'subject', either the inside of a room or the outside through the window.

It might not look as spectacular in most images, sometimes it does. What does look 'spectacular' is the general tonemapping technique used to emulate high dynamic range images on computers - highlights become even more highlighted, shadows become more highlighted... basically, you're levelling out the dynamic range of the image to level, where everything looks like it is exposed to achieve the same amount of light in the scene. While this also gives you great results from time to time, it's basically a 'bad attempt' at HDR.

So both can give you great results, but it's not all the same imo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bubbabyte

Call it what you want Keito, to each his own. Like i said before i'm no expert and i dont feel i need to quote definitions of HDR to validate my point that the second (HDR) image looks much much worse than the original that you posted. With your example you could have saved some times just upped the brightness and lowered the saturation and would have the same result.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Damo R.
1506958267_815b6bae3a.jpg
Link to post
Share on other sites

gigapixels
Amazing shot. I love it. :yes:

Thanks, I appreciate it :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

giga
shots from testing my new cam

1501923596_060ec64b3e.jpg?v=0

1501059633_e29eaa6a53.jpg?v=0

1501071533_9a6f411d95.jpg?v=0

1501915328_ac7f29308a.jpg?v=0

1501045499_1f857ca83a.jpg?v=0

I wish I could pan as well as you. Great shots!

Link to post
Share on other sites

funkymunky

Rappy is that Brighton Pier??

And

Is your sig meant to be a Predators eye?? I like it :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Damo R.
Rappy is that Brighton Pier??

And

Is your sig meant to be a Predators eye?? I like it :)

No its Bognor Pier (where I live)

and its Ironman :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

funkymunky

Oh lol

Bognor Regis.

I went on the p*ss there once when I worked in Chichester for a few months. Was fun :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

MasterC

1512982654_e3dc661063.jpg

Link to the bigger version.

Edited by MasterC
Link to post
Share on other sites

+Dick Montage

WOW MasterC - that looks like a model city, but the detail gives it away!

Link to post
Share on other sites

MasterC
WOW MasterC - that looks like a model city, but the detail gives it away!

That's the look I was going for :happy:

Link to post
Share on other sites

BajiRav

Some obligatory fall photos. Shot over the weekend on my drive across Vermont.

1505758553_8196508a17.jpg

1506664960_0dbf4657f8.jpg

1506698974_b04059277a.jpg

1505871891_896674170c.jpg

1505813327_5eaded58b2.jpg

1505941239_0b8e2c512d.jpg

1505854991_018f975818.jpg

About this last photo, what is the best way to shoot pictures with signs ? I used my flash, but I think background went dull 'cause of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Damo R.

Master C : I like that really clever :D

dhan - Yeah I hate shooting signs for the reason the flash reflects off it, I try to use a soft flash.

Link to post
Share on other sites

MasterC
Some obligatory fall photos. Shot over the weekend on my drive across Vermont.

I really like the waterfall one - looks peacefull. :yes:

Master C : I like that really clever :D

Thanks Rappy (Y)

Link to post
Share on other sites

o0moonman0o

1520023209_76284425c6.jpg?v=0

1520884340_f7fdc4b178.jpg?v=0

1520882412_178d57db7e.jpg?v=0

1520018657_68736c5fbe.jpg?v=0

1520017805_8e07b5a8dd.jpg?v=0

1520879026_4d7ab308ed.jpg?v=0

1520014719_498ee975b8.jpg?v=0

1520877360_360167e35a.jpg?v=0

1520019261_b83d2d5238.jpg?v=0

Link to post
Share on other sites

accesser
1520884340_f7fdc4b178.jpg?v=0

Love this one so nice and shap (Y)

1520018657_68736c5fbe.jpg?v=0

Love the colors in this one great work (Y) (Y)

Link to post
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.