+Audioboxer Subscriber² Posted January 11, 2008 Subscriber² Share Posted January 11, 2008 I'm a fan of Sony frequently updating their firmware. That way if something needs fixing, it's done immediately. There's a difference between fixing something and adding new content. If there is an issue with a game/feature you can bet on a quick firmware fix - Such as 2.10 to 2.11 or something. Substantial changes such as 2.10 to 2.5, will be slower, to allow more content to be added/more significant content to be added. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrunknMunky Veteran Posted January 11, 2008 Veteran Share Posted January 11, 2008 Isn't this the same as;https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=605466 I thought I read this news before, but I couldn't find a topic in my 'find member's topics' list :laugh:. Mods feel free to merge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Ryu Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 Booo! I also prefer the more frequent updates. I want them now!! I can't believe people are complaining when good things happen.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CelticWhisper Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 How about keeping semi-frequent updates and then releasing "update packs" a la Windows service packs every few months? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PyX Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 I prefer only 2.x updates with a good quality control so that they don't release a 2.xy immediately after the 2.x update because there's a critical bug that was introduced. Also, the update system should be more intelligent. Right now it seems to update the WHOLE firmware, but it should only patch the needed files. Oh, and I still get many random disconnections with my brand new linksys wireless router. For a total of 6 wifi routers, none worked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
insomniac9 Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 I like the idea of having fewer updates. The list of features by CVG is good, as well as all the ones listed I would like to see the remaining hard disk space on the front screen and also an option to autoshut down the ps3 after x number of hours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Si Veteran Posted January 11, 2008 Veteran Share Posted January 11, 2008 I thought I read this news before, but I couldn't find a topic in my 'find member's topics' list :laugh:. Mods feel free to merge. Threads merged Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huleboeren Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 Why though? Psychological gain that you are getting something important? :rofl: I'd rather not see the PS3 updating/rebooting just to add some new themes/fonts and a graphical visualization to the music player 2 times a month. Gimme meaty updates every 2/3 months and ill be happy. In the meantime keep me content with weekly store updates and weekly/monthly updates/additions to Home (Y) Exactly ^^ I love firmware updates in all shapes and sizes be it PS3, X360 or iPod :p I love the smell of firmware in the morning :wub: Id say no more than 2months between bigger firmware updates please :) Or atleast release them on specific days in specific months - so you have something to look forward to :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CloudEngineer Posted January 12, 2008 Share Posted January 12, 2008 i'd prefer more over less Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts