Recommended Posts

1.50.2-SB66:

* Synchronised with official r1228 (3b76460a29) from r1175 (0579dc80ff), changelog

* Updated MPlayer and MEncoder to SB24 from SB23, changelog

* Fixed video aspect ratios and subtitle positioning when using overscan compensation

* Clarified some MEncoder settings that were misleading/wrong

SubJunk Windows Build / SubJunk Linux Build / Official Build

  • 2 weeks later...

Does anyone use custom thumbnails? I've started making some for the movies and clips that I know for sure that I'm going to keep and have slopply threw some blu-ray images together to make it look like the all too common media case with media disc sticking half way out. What, if any, do you use?

  • 2 weeks later...

Does anyone use custom thumbnails? I've started making some for the movies and clips that I know for sure that I'm going to keep and have slopply threw some blu-ray images together to make it look like the all too common media case with media disc sticking half way out. What, if any, do you use?

bit late, but i get all my images from either bluray.com or amazon. most of my movies are either 720 or 1080 so i have no problems using the bluray coverart. Awhile back someone made a plugin that got the coverart automatically i think..

1.50.2-SB67:

* Synchronised with official r1241 (e257484166) from r1228 (3b76460a29), changelog

* Updated MPlayer and MEncoder to SB26 from SB24, changelog

* Fixed the display of SRT and embedded plaintext subtitles for the Hebrew language.

* Made font scale larger by default.

* Stop disabling certain options since the logic wasn't good.

SubJunk Windows Build / SubJunk Linux Build / Official Build

1.51.0-SB68:

* Synchronised with official r1253 (f1bc902f83), changelog

* Updated MPlayer and MEncoder to SB28, changelog

* Updated MediaInfo to 0.7.54, changelog

* Updated ImageMagick Convert to 6.7.6, changelog

SubJunk Windows Build / SubJunk Linux Build / Official Build

I still can't understand why Sony is being so stupid and not updating the PS3 to accept NTFS drives. That is ridiculous. Nobody uses FAT32 anymore and you would think that Sony, knowing this, would update the PS3 to accept NTFS.

I still can't understand why Sony is being so stupid and not updating the PS3 to accept NTFS drives. That is ridiculous. Nobody uses FAT32 anymore and you would think that Sony, knowing this, would update the PS3 to accept NTFS.

You have to pay licensing fees to MS to use NTFS.

You have to pay licensing fees to MS to use NTFS.

I'm sure Sony can afford them. They have deep pockets. Every other multimedia device out there (Roku, WDTV, Etc) support NTFS and they have less money than Sony does.

I'm sure Sony can afford them. They have deep pockets. Every other multimedia device out there (Roku, WDTV, Etc) support NTFS and they have less money than Sony does.

For the gaming side of things it has absolutely no consumer value. The system Sony uses for their hard drives (forget it's name right now) supports files with a size over 4GB, so what use is NTFS other than a money bleeder? I assume it's loyalties to MS on every PS3 sold if they were to use NTFS.

The devices you listed are dedicated media products, this is not.

As much as I'd like NTFS as well for USB drives, it was never going to and never will happen. If there's anything over 4GB I want to watch I either stream it, or copy it to my PS3 hard drive through my PC.

  • 2 weeks later...

For some reason, I couldn't get the latest version to work with Windows 7 64-bit. I looked at the FAQ area and found a guide to compile my own build (see here).

I've uploaded it to Dropbox so here's the link: http://dl.dropbox.co...dows-1.50.2.exe [PMS-1.50.2]

I'm almost 100% sure it'll work with any 64-bit Windows OS. It's supposed to be the latest beta version but it isn't. I'm still trying to figure things out but If anyone knows how to get the latest version to work with Windows 7 64-bit, please let me know. I'm guessing I have to use the right version of Java. Anytime I try to run the latest version, a window comes up that says something along the lines of "The download could not be completed."

Anyway, I seem to have found a sweet spot for streaming HD content to my PS3. My main PC is connected to my wireless N router with a PCIe x1 wireless N adapter (which is on the second floor of my house). My brother's PS3 is in the living room which is obviously on the main floor. It's connected directly to my wireless router via ethernet. I can stream 1080p content without any issues whatsoever. I recently changed my wireless network to N only so that may have helped. In the past, 720p content would stutter a lot which made the viewing experience unpleasant. I've seen the current bitrate go as high as 109 Mbps. It never went past 75 Mbps when my wireless network was in mixed G/N mode.

Having some problems with PS3 media server.

First off, it won't resume a file like the 360 does. If I stop watching something half way through, then I have to manually get back to where I was before. Now, the problem here is that if I use the scene selection tool (square) to select a scene, the rest of the playback will be stop / start no matter how long I leave it to buffer. This applies to videos that are being transcoded and ones that aren't.

I can skip through using the search feature but that's often very time consuming and the controls are slow to respond to when I want to play.

If I just use the PS3's built in video player - then I can use the scene selection and playback is smooth. But this also won't remember where I got to in the video.

Anyone else have these problems? because I'll be going back to the 360 soon, even if it does mean I have to have a cable across my living room.

Having some problems with PS3 media server.

First off, it won't resume a file like the 360 does. If I stop watching something half way through, then I have to manually get back to where I was before. Now, the problem here is that if I use the scene selection tool (square) to select a scene, the rest of the playback will be stop / start no matter how long I leave it to buffer. This applies to videos that are being transcoded and ones that aren't.

I can skip through using the search feature but that's often very time consuming and the controls are slow to respond to when I want to play.

If I just use the PS3's built in video player - then I can use the scene selection and playback is smooth. But this also won't remember where I got to in the video.

Anyone else have these problems? because I'll be going back to the 360 soon, even if it does mean I have to have a cable across my living room.

I have a wired cat6 connection between my PC/Router/PS3 and I always have issues with anything other than Pause and Play. If I attempt to FF/RW or even Skip to the next video I always get network error - its annoying but most of the time im watching a movie or sitcom so pause is usually used.

Having some problems with PS3 media server.

First off, it won't resume a file like the 360 does. If I stop watching something half way through, then I have to manually get back to where I was before. Now, the problem here is that if I use the scene selection tool (square) to select a scene, the rest of the playback will be stop / start no matter how long I leave it to buffer. This applies to videos that are being transcoded and ones that aren't.

I can skip through using the search feature but that's often very time consuming and the controls are slow to respond to when I want to play.

If I just use the PS3's built in video player - then I can use the scene selection and playback is smooth. But this also won't remember where I got to in the video.

Anyone else have these problems? because I'll be going back to the 360 soon, even if it does mean I have to have a cable across my living room.

To answer your question directly, correct, if you are doing larger rips, resume and fast forward really do not work on PS3 media server. Actually sometimes it resumes for me, but not very often.

My own experience is fast Forward actually never worked on the 360 for me in a usable manner, all that did was resume and rewind. And resume only worked around half of the time. Fast forward was never all that smooth on larger rips. Since I tend to only watch 1080p rips, I just think neither console is all that capable of fast forwarding 1080p rips. And my network is Gigabit capable, so I am getting great streaming speeds, so I know it is not that. I basically except it as one of the drawbacks of watching rips, but I like having all of my content digitally on a media server.

The above combined with the fact the 360 does not play DTS either, and well I have learned to live with pausing movies. Honestly I was never a big fast forward or rewind person while watching a movie anyway, so I do not really miss these features, hence why I can live with it. I also find the ps3 plays all of the different file types I throw at it, I literally have only had like 2 avi's since I have been using PS3 media server not work, and the 360 when I used it was hit or miss with playing all content.

So I live with the PS3 not having rewind and fast forward as DTS definitely enhances my viewing experience more.

And actually I just realized something, you are saying going back to the cable with the 360, which obviously means you are streaming wirelessly to the PS3, so yeah, you are going to run into a ton of issues. I do it wired. I tried wirelessly, and I could not stream 1080p. Average of 8-12GB file size. Wireless just did not really work.

I don't watch files that are that big - 3gb at most. They're in 1080p most of the time, but they're only TV episodes so never more than an hour long.

Regarding wireless, the PS3 is less than a metre away from both the router and the PC that is streaming without any obstructions - it's on a wireless n network and the speeds are about 97% when it reaches the PS3 so I don't think that's the issue.

It's just a flaw in the software I guess - I've actually found fast forward to be much more reliable than scene selection, although sometimes it knocks the sound out of sync.

It would be great if it could learn to resume files though.

I don't watch files that are that big - 3gb at most. They're in 1080p most of the time, but they're only TV episodes so never more than an hour long.

Regarding wireless, the PS3 is less than a metre away from both the router and the PC that is streaming without any obstructions - it's on a wireless n network and the speeds are about 97% when it reaches the PS3 so I don't think that's the issue.

It's just a flaw in the software I guess - I've actually found fast forward to be much more reliable than scene selection, although sometimes it knocks the sound out of sync.

It would be great if it could learn to resume files though.

Hmmm, yeah a 3GB file should work then, it is not the resolution that is the issue with me, it is always the size of the file. Odd. Just out of curiosity did you ever try it wired to see if it performs any better than wireless? I would be interested in hearing the results. What version of PS3 Media Server are you using?

Hmmm, yeah a 3GB file should work then, it is not the resolution that is the issue with me, it is always the size of the file. Odd. Just out of curiosity did you ever try it wired to see if it performs any better than wireless? I would be interested in hearing the results. What version of PS3 Media Server are you using?

I tried wired when I first encountered the issue, it made no difference. If I use the scene selection feature the video will stop and start regardless of anything else.

I can use the fast forward feature to pick up where I left off - but this is not very accurate and can often make the audio out of sync.

Neither console is particularly good at streaming content to be honest.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Just pull a 4Chan and ignore the UK gov, or better troll them. It's not like they can enforce the fine across border.
    • It has NEVER been shown that all these overreaching creepy methods of surveillance have ever saved a child or prevented a terrorist attack. Not a single one. It's the kind of people like you who just wave it away as "paranoid conspiracy" that makes big tech and governments this creepy mass data hoarding entities. Not only that, 3/4 of these surveillance ideas undermine the very foundations of safe online communication because they always want to have a backdoor in everything "just in case" they might need it to... checks the notes "save the children". If you put a backdoor into encryption chain there is no encryption chain anymore. You know what encryption keeps safe? Your medical records, your online shopping and credit card during payment, your photos in the cloud, your emails, your passwords, everything. There is ZERO guarantee only the good guys will use it. And if you think police suddenly can't apprehend child abusers because of encryption, Epstein was running his entire sex trafficking ring using GMail which is not even encrypted end to end. Or to make matters even worse, USA has a **** and a good buddy of Epstein as a president. Absolutely NOTHING has been done to address it. Maxwell just got a better "hotel" room as a reward. This clearly shows how they absolutely don't really care about the children but they care about the absolute control over all of us. And you're defending them here. Good grief. On top of constant attempts to insert backdoors into encryption chain, the entire age verification nonsense is again entirely over reaching, creepy, invades everyone's privacy with premise of yet again "protecting the children" instead of demanding device makers to provide simple and powerful tools for PARENTS to control how their children use devices and what they do on them. THIS would be the way, not the stupid age verification for everyone. Imagine if government would be dictating companies how their phones work and not the company's IT department. The parents should be the IT department to their children. And for everyone excusing "they are not knowledgeable enough" buuuuuulsheat. We live in a digital age, if you have children now, you absolutely are well versed in digital everything at least to basic extent. If you're not, how do you even function in these times then? Reality is that parents are just lazy and don't want to deal with this. They want government to raise their kids because they are too busy scrolling stupid Instagram and Tiktok or some bs.
    • You could make the argument that K should not be included, but FC, the fried chicken, is not the framework, it's the product. It's the Paint in Paint.NET. A closer analogy is if KFC included the name of the deep fryer they used. HennyPennyFC.
    • Flying as the central point eh... As a massive Spyro fan who has replayed the Reignited Trilogy three times and the originals 4 times... I have some doubts, but maybe...
    • Apple is expanding Private Cloud Compute beyond its own data centers by Pradeep Viswanathan At WWDC 2026, as part of the improved Apple Intelligence capabilities, Apple today announced that it is expanding Private Cloud Compute (PCC), its privacy-focused cloud infrastructure for Apple Intelligence, beyond its own data centers for the first time. Private Cloud Compute was designed to handle Apple Intelligence requests that are too complex to run fully on-device. The PCC system does not store user data and does not allow Apple or anyone else to access user requests. Last year, Apple also expanded its Security Bounty program with rewards of up to $1 million for researchers who could find serious vulnerabilities in PCC. Until now, Apple's PCC data centers were using Apple's own silicon. As part of the expansion, Apple is working with Google and NVIDIA to run new Apple Intelligence workloads on Google Cloud systems powered by NVIDIA GPUs. Apple will be using this new infrastructure to execute more demanding AI tasks while maintaining the same privacy and security guarantees of PCC. The new implementation uses NVIDIA Confidential Computing with NVIDIA GPUs, Intel CPUs with TDX, and Google’s Titan chip. Apple says it has worked with Google to build additional protections beyond a traditional confidential computing deployment. Despite the expansion to third-party data centers, Apple claims that its core PCC requirements remain unchanged, including stateless computation, no privileged runtime access, non-targetability, and verifiable transparency. The company highlighted that it will continue to control the PCC software stack, and Apple devices will only trust PCC software that has been cryptographically approved by Apple. To take security to the next level, Apple mentioned that it is maintaining an append-only ledger of Google Cloud hardware that is part of the PCC fleet. The company claims this will help reduce the risk of supply chain attacks. In addition to AI infrastructure, Apple also worked with Google to use technologies behind the Gemini family of models to build the next generation of Apple Foundation Models to power Apple Intelligence features across on-device and cloud workloads. As expected, for more demanding AI tasks like agentic tool use and complex reasoning, Apple will rely on the expanded PCC infrastructure running on Google Cloud. The expansion of PCC on Google Cloud will gradually ramp toward the full set of protections during the summer preview period. As before, Apple will also publish binaries for public inspection, provide research tooling, and give researchers access to live PCC nodes in research mode through the Apple Security Bounty Program.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      222
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      92
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      86
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!