The Great UAC Debate!


UAC  

1412 members have voted

  1. 1. Do You Use UAC?

    • Yes
      477
    • Yes, On "Silent Mode"
      91
    • No (I use an Admin Account)
      496
    • No (I use a Standard Account)
      39
    • I don't use Windows Vista
      118
  2. 2. Have You Ever Been Saved By UAC?

    • Yes
      226
    • No
      932
    • I don't use Windows Vista
      106


Recommended Posts

It really is no wonder Windows has such a horrible security reputation that persists even to this day: It seems that a large portion of its user base simply doesn't care about security.

If you know what you're doing, UAC won't help much. UAC helps those who don't know what UAC is but end-users with a bit of intelligence to question what's happening and not simply click allow or cancel blindly.

I myself changed the UAC setting from completely off to on in quiet mode with TweakUAC. At least the admin rights are elevated when I want to install something and don't want to get bothered by it because I know what I'm doing & clicking.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
If you know what you're doing, UAC won't help much. UAC helps those who don't know what UAC is but end-users with a bit of intelligence to question what's happening and not simply click allow or cancel blindly.

I myself changed the UAC setting from completely off to on in quiet mode with TweakUAC. At least the admin rights are elevated when I want to install something and don't want to get bothered by it because I know what I'm doing & clicking.

Yeah silent mode is still more secure. I think it's just dumb to turn it completely off when you can use silent mode.

I found out how to turn it off like 6 months ago, which was pivotal.

I actually like Vista, especially since that feature had been turned off.

...and no it didn't save me. I'm sure it did some people though.

As a hobby during off hours and occasionally during work hours, I persevere to help people with various software-related issues. On a regular basis I have to show people how to disable and enable certain features of their XP-based systems. Surprisingly a huge amount of Windows users are still using XP. Unsurprisingly, this kind of hesitation is brought about from a well-placed fear for Vista's instability.

Vista boasted a list of features that users have been craving since some of the early releases of XP, but there were flaws. Naturally, bugs, glitches, and eventually crashes are ultimately native to all software. Especially high-demand operating systems like the Windows platform. One of the best-yet-underrated features of MS Windows Vista is User Account Control, sometimes called User Access Control (UAC) is so discredited for it's persistant annoyance anytime someone wants to change the system configuration, install programs, or affect the registry.

Here's the fact about UAC. UAC can prevent unauthorized installation (and in some cases, authorized installation) of malicious software by forcing the user to pay attention to nearly everything affecting their system. One of the problems is, people go into "autopilot" and have a habit of clicking OK/YES/ACCEPT on every prompt without actually reading the description and scrutinizing unrecognized applications or registry entries.

When UAC is off, you're susceptible to the mounting plague of viruses spyware and malware invading the internet, p2p software and even offline networks. Even though UAC isn't 100% effective at preventing malicious viral attacks, I have been saved several times when moving data from portable/external drives to PCs.

If you're an advanced user and can solve viral issues yourself, it's not really a big deal. However, if you're not willing to spend hours trying to recover your system, can't afford industry-level virus protection, and simply don't have persistant internet access to receive virus /trojan definition updates on a regular basis, you might consider turning UAC back on.

If you're insistant on disabling the UAC utility in Windows Vista, I urge you to consider a 3rd party option. They can be as or even more effective in preventing these sorts of infections/attacks. Here's a few of the more popular ones to consider.

AVG Antivirus (Free).

I have used this with XP since I discovered it in 2006 and have had unparalelled success in stomping and preventing infections.

Spybot Search & Destroy (free)

Spybot kills spyware, plain and simple, but it also blocks literally thousands (possibly in the hundreds of thousands) of threats to your system. It includes an Immunization tool as well which (with current updates) prevents the installation of over a hundred-thousand infections. The program also includes an array of advanced mode features which include a system integrity scanner / registry scanner and startup config utility. Spybot also includes two plug-ins which provide UAC-like support, but are not nearly as persistantly annoying. Some email support is also included.

ClamWin (Free)

This powerful light-weight virus scanner (found at portableapps.com) updates in less than a minute. It has an ultra light-weight memory footprint, supports file, folder, drive, entire system scans. It's robust with usable features, and downsizes on the things that don't fall under "Virus Scanner".

______________________________________________________________________

  • 2 weeks later...

Surely not using UAC means you're an Admin user? So what does:

No (I use a Standard Account) - Mean?

The Aministrator account and Standard Accounts with UAC off are effectively the same.

p.s - There's next to no reason anyone should ever completely disable UAC. Given that it's the prompts and not security people hate, simply set it to Silent mode. Problem sorted.

Security Software alone isn't really enough. UAC works with not instead of security software. If the Security Software fails UAC will prevent access to the System folders.

Edited by bradavon

I turn UAC off as part of my standard Vista install. I would class myself as a very competant Windows user and know how to maintain an install. The only reason I would consider enabling UAC is if I was going to ditch my anti-virus and needed a little extra assurance.

I turn UAC off as part of my standard Vista install. I would class myself as a very competant Windows user and know how to maintain an install. The only reason I would consider enabling UAC is if I was going to ditch my anti-virus and needed a little extra assurance.

Just put uac in silent mode, no prompts bothering you + extra assurance.

Has UAC been improved? I just upgraded from Home Premium x86 to Vista Ultimate x64 and I don't get confirmation messages as much as before, and I'm using just about the same applications. Anyone notice this? Or is it just me?

Then again, I did upgrade to Norton Antivirus 2009 Gamer Edition instead of the good ol' Kaspersky. But I doubt that'll make a difference.

  • 2 weeks later...

To be honest, I'd actually let it on.

Had it been not too effective. There are many application, be it games, or even completely different, that sometimes use lua modding etc.

UAC does not prompt, no window comes up, but it does not allow the changes from many of these things to take effect.

I use UAC, on the highest settings. I will say that sometimes (very rarely) it causes problems with certain executables in that they will never load, and it will just be waiting for the UAC prompt to come up and ends up slowing the entire system down considerably. I've only experienced this on one program installer, and generally have never had any problems. It can be circumvented by installing through the command prompt.

To be honest, I'd actually let it on.

Had it been not too effective. There are many application, be it games, or even completely different, that sometimes use lua modding etc.

UAC does not prompt, no window comes up, but it does not allow the changes from many of these things to take effect.

For Apps that fail, right click and Run as Admin.

Turning UAC off means Malware can run as Admin too (like XP). No Anti-Malware software is 100% effective.

  • 1 month later...
I never got viruses or spyware running XP with an admin account, so why should I need UAC popping up and annoying me all the time.

It doesn't pop up all the time, unless you're constantly doing things that require elevation, and there's no reason why you would be.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Although I totally see the benifits of UAC, it annoys me, therefore as a tech savvy user I trust myself enough to leave it turned off

It's not about trusting yourself. It's about trusting the applications you use and the web sites, good or bad, you visit. By turning UAC off, you trust that such things won't change any system settings or install applications to system directories without your say so. Which is what can happen now that UAC is off. Therefore, you do not see the benefits of UAC. If you truly did see the benefits, you would have left it on.

In the end, I do not see UAC prompts often enough or in places I feel they shouldn't be to consider them annoying. The benefits of UAC far outweigh any potential annoyances it could provide.

  • 1 month later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Glary Utilities 6.43.0.47 by Razvan Serea Glary Utilities offers numerous powerful and easy-to-use system tools and utilities to fix, speed up, maintain and protect your PC. Glary Utilities allow you to clean common system junk files, as well as invalid registry entries and Internet traces. You can manage and delete browser add-ons, analyze disk space usage and find duplicate files. You can also view and manage installed shell extensions, encrypt your files from unauthorized access and use, split large files into smaller manageable files and then rejoin them. Furthermore, Glary Utilities includes the options to find, fix, or remove broken Windows shortcuts, manage the programs that start at Windows startup and uninstall software. All Glary Utilities tools can be accessed through an eye-pleasing and totally simplistic interface. Glary Utilities 6.43.0.47 changelog: Optimized Memory Defrager: Optimized the clipboard cleaning algorithm, increasing speed by 5%. Optimized Wipe Free Space: Optimized the free space wiping algorithm, increasing speed by 8%. Minor GUI improvements. Minor bug fixes. Download: Glary Utilities 6.43.0.47 | 27.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Portable Glary Utilities | 32.3 MB View: Glary Utilities Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • "Of course the easiest solution is to switch to uBlock Origin Lite if you want to remain on Chrome, as it is MV3-based, but from our experience, uBO Lite does not seem to be as good as the original non-Lite version" In my experience uBlock Origin Lite does the job for normal everday home users. When they kill that we get to watch Firefox and Brave get a boost in user market share.
    • Block by DNS ad blocker! I dare you! I will even layer unlock Origin, on top of my internal DNS, if I need to and I don’t even block ads today (I really should but this type of behavior makes me angry). I suppose I could also just be lazy, and add the flags myself, back to each release (it wouldn’t be that difficult).
    • Wonder what MPs have ties to these privacy/verification/data harvesting companies that are going to step in this time. Last time under the Tories half the cabinet had fingers in the pies, heck even the PM and his wife at the time was working for silicon valley, probably made a fortune.
    • Google Chrome is killing all uBlock Origin bypasses, Microsoft Edge, Opera to follow by Sayan Sen For a while now the transition away from Manifest V2 (MV2) to MV3 has been on-going and it looks like it is entering its final phase of deprecation, at least, in the case of Google Chrome. A recent discussion thread in the w3c WebExtensions Community Group GitHub repo has highlighted how the latest and upcoming versions of the most popular browser are expected to be its final releases with support for MV2 extensions. Chromium contributor Andrey Bershanskiy shared details about recent Chromium changes and according to comments from Google engineer Devlin Cronin, Chrome has now started removing the flags that previously controlled MV2 availability. kExtensionManifestV2Disabled, the Chromium feature flag that allowed controlled disabling of MV2 add-ons, is now completely removed, which means you will likely no longer find uBlock Origin in your browser extensions list. He wrote: "The kExtensionManifestV2Disabled feature has been default-enabled for over a year. Remove the feature and the effectively-dead code. ... Any tests that relied on being in the "warning" phase (i.e., with the kExtensionManifestV2Disabled) for their sole behavior testing are removed, since this stage is no longer reachable." Cronin further explained why MV2 extensions are no longer allowed in supported Chrome versions as maintaining the associated functionality indefinitely is no longer possible. He cited growing technical difficulties and implementation complexities as well as security concerns. He wrote: "MV2 extensions are no longer allowed in any supported version of Chrome, and we are removing support for them and the associated functionality. We won't be able to provide / maintain this functionality indefinitely due to the complexity and tech debt, as well as the security risks it entails (we've actually found a number of bugs that are specific to MV2 lately). Of course, other browsers can continue supporting these if they so desire. Unfortunately, we won't be putting code behind a compilation flag ... We won't be removing all the MV2 code wholesale right away, so many of these things will continue working for awhile (but they will go away eventually, and some may go away sooner than others)." What this essentially means is that the tricks and bypasses that were used to keep MV2 extensions like uBlock Origin and others alive will not work any more on Chrome, or at least not for very long. For example the Windows Registry mod that could extend MV2 availability will cease to function after Chromium version 151. Here is a rundown of the changes coming in the final such releases of Chromium releases: Chromium 150 lost ExtensionManifestV2Disabled option Chromium 151 will loose ExtensionManifestV2Unsupported option Chromium 151 will loose ExtensionManifestV2Availability option Chromium 151 will likely loose AllowLegacyMV2Extensions option Other Chromium-based browsers like Opera and Microsoft Edge could soon follow suit too. Although it is not specified, Edge began disabling uBlock Origin back in February, and Opera could also stop the functioning of MV2 add-ons, even though it had committed to support MV2 for longer in October 2024. uBlock Origin developer Raymond Hill (gorhill) apparently stated the following: "For Opera I did submit 1.70.0 rather late, but this was weeks ago. A while ago I received an email from Opera that they plan to abandon MV2-based extension so maybe they are no longer allocating resources for reviewing such extensions." The email which developers like Gorhill mentions was received from Opera last year. Here is what it seemingly said: Hence for now the only Chromium browser that seems to be on-board fully with MV2 support is Brave, and perhaps Vivaldi as well. Meanwhile if you want to ditch Chromium browsers entirely then Mozilla Firefox is an excellent alternative as MV3 and MV2 are both supported. Of course the easiest solution is to switch to uBlock Origin Lite if you want to remain on Chrome, as it is MV3-based, but from our experience, uBO Lite does not seem to be as good as the original non-Lite version. Source: w3C (GitHub repo) As an online publication, Neowin too relies on ads for operating costs and, if you use an ad blocker, we'd appreciate being whitelisted. In addition, we have an ad-free subscription for $28 a year, which is another way to show support!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      skylerssviv earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      mobmobiles earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      217
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      92
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      82
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!