Windows XP SP3 Is Now RTM.


Recommended Posts

Nice find! now where's the download link? :D or will it be the same as Vista SP1 and rename the last RC to RTM!

I Tried Looking 4 It On Microsoft Update And Could Not Find It, So I Am Guessing That It Is Not RTW (Release 2 Web) Just Yet, Just FYI.

Nice find but not yet RTW. Unless you can provide direct link to downloads it is not final.

I Did Not Say That It Was RTW, I Said That It's Now RTM According 2 That Microsoft Support Lifecycles Website, Just FYI.

This isn't another April Fools is it? :unsure: I was under the impression XP SP3 was currently at RC2? maybe I've read the page wrong but it seems more like it suppose to be (not is) RTM by now, but I haven't heard anything official about it. Still be nice if it was out soon, I've got a XP machine to reinstall and I'm waiting for SP3 to release so I can do a clean install of that.

EDIT: From what I can tell it is not RTM, it's been delayed till second half of April. Here are some sources;

Windows XP SP3 RTM Schedule & Updates! - TechARP (March 28)

Windows XP SP3 Due Next Month, Report Says - PC World (March 24)

Even Paul Thurrott is hinting towards an April release.

Edited by Xerxes
this a april fools joke ?

No, It Is Not An April Fools Joke, View The Microsoft Website (Using MSIE), And It Will Say That Windows XP Service Pack 3 General Availability Date Was March 31st, 2008, Just FYI.

No, It Is Not An April Fools Joke, View The Microsoft Website (Using MSIE), And It Will Say That Windows XP Service Pack 3 General Availability Date Was March 31st, 2008, Just FYI.

Nah it is a joke. M$ would have made something official by now if it was RTM.

Nah it is a joke. M$ would have made something official by now if it was RTM.

Hey That is An Official Microsoft Website, That I Found That At, And It Has The Date Of 3/31/2008 On It, So It's Not My Fault That Nobody Found That Page Yesterday, So Chill Out, Just FYI.

Hey That is An Official Microsoft Website, That I Found That At, And It Has The Date Of 3/31/2008 On It, So It's Not My Fault That Nobody Found That Page Yesterday, So Chill Out, Just FYI.

Wel I am a beta tester for a lot of M$ products and xp sp3 was def one of them I have tested.If it was RTM we as Testers would have known it Monday then.

How? The Windows Beta Site was closed down the first week in March.

It was closed to public but it was still in testing to small group. Remember that strange build that mysteriously showed up 5508 before M$ released RC2 of it well I had it and installed it and it worked awesome.

Wel I am a beta tester for a lot of M$ products and xp sp3 was def one of them I have tested.If it was RTM we as Testers would have known it Monday then.

Not Necessarly, I Am Also A Microsoft Beta Tester, And I Have Been In Some Beta's Where Microsoft Ended The Beta Testing Before The Product Was Finished, And They Completed The Beta Testing Internally, Just FYI. I Have Also Heard Some Reports From Other Beta Testers Of Beta's Where They Did Not Find Out That The Beta That They Were Testing had Gone RTM Until Microsoft Made A Public Announcement On The Microsoft Press Pass Website As Well, Just FYI.

Not Necessarly, I Am Also A Microsoft Beta Tester, And I Have Been In Some Beta's Where Microsoft Ended The Beta Testing Before The Product Was Finished, And They Completed The Beta Testing Internally, Just FYI. I Have Also Heard Some Reports From Other Beta Testers Of Beta's Where They Did Not Find Out That The Beta That They Were Testing had Gone RTM Until Microsoft Made A Public Announcement On The Microsoft Press Pass Website As Well, Just FYI.

None of the products I have tested has ended before the product went RTM. I am not sure what products you're referring to but in my case I have never had that happen.

None of the products I have tested has ended before the product went RTM. I am not sure what products you're referring to but in my case I have never had that happen.

What I Am Referring 2 Is The Microsoft Security Updates CD 4 Windows 98/ME Beta Program In 2003 Or 2004, Just FYI.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Apple is expanding Private Cloud Compute beyond its own data centers by Pradeep Viswanathan At WWDC 2026, as part of the improved Apple Intelligence capabilities, Apple today announced that it is expanding Private Cloud Compute (PCC), its privacy-focused cloud infrastructure for Apple Intelligence, beyond its own data centers for the first time. Private Cloud Compute was designed to handle Apple Intelligence requests that are too complex to run fully on-device. The PCC system does not store user data and does not allow Apple or anyone else to access user requests. Last year, Apple also expanded its Security Bounty program with rewards of up to $1 million for researchers who could find serious vulnerabilities in PCC. Until now, Apple's PCC data centers were using Apple's own silicon. As part of the expansion, Apple is working with Google and NVIDIA to run new Apple Intelligence workloads on Google Cloud systems powered by NVIDIA GPUs. Apple will be using this new infrastructure to execute more demanding AI tasks while maintaining the same privacy and security guarantees of PCC. The new implementation uses NVIDIA Confidential Computing with NVIDIA GPUs, Intel CPUs with TDX, and Google’s Titan chip. Apple says it has worked with Google to build additional protections beyond a traditional confidential computing deployment. Despite the expansion to third-party data centers, Apple claims that its core PCC requirements remain unchanged, including stateless computation, no privileged runtime access, non-targetability, and verifiable transparency. The company highlighted that it will continue to control the PCC software stack, and Apple devices will only trust PCC software that has been cryptographically approved by Apple. To take security to the next level, Apple mentioned that it is maintaining an append-only ledger of Google Cloud hardware that is part of the PCC fleet. The company claims this will help reduce the risk of supply chain attacks. In addition to AI infrastructure, Apple also worked with Google to use technologies behind the Gemini family of models to build the next generation of Apple Foundation Models to power Apple Intelligence features across on-device and cloud workloads. As expected, for more demanding AI tasks like agentic tool use and complex reasoning, Apple will rely on the expanded PCC infrastructure running on Google Cloud. The expansion of PCC on Google Cloud will gradually ramp toward the full set of protections during the summer preview period. As before, Apple will also publish binaries for public inspection, provide research tooling, and give researchers access to live PCC nodes in research mode through the Apple Security Bounty Program.
    • my problem with outlook (new) is that it connects only to outlook.com. all connections to external providers goes through there. Got your mail server and want to use imap directly? no way... it adds a connector on outlook.com. last bug; if your email on an external provider if the same as principal email of your microsoft account, it doesn't work...
    • It's the only reason I finally have an iPhone (for work) and enjoy using it so much that I'm tempted to move from android next time I need to replace my own device
    • So is Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, just to mention a few. What's your point? Everyone is a threat from their enemies' perspective. I'd say that Israel is only a threat to their immediate enemies like Hamas, Hezbollah and the Iranian regime, not to anyone else.
    • The government is not the good guy either. You propose 99% of people require that the government overreach and govern their freedom of information and privacy, while ignoring the government is made up 100% of people, of which 99% are (as you described) brain dead. You can't have both. The reality is Signal is absolutely right and the government is doing what it has always done. Ignoring that we are their boss and grabbing all the power they possibly can to make sure we aren't. Your (societies) ###### parenting is not reason enough as to why I can't have a safe platform for my data/information. Thinking the government is helping is precisely what they are targeting psychologically to take suckers like you for a ride. "Think of the children" was, has, is, and will always be a mechanism of control. In the rare occasion it's actually essential the mass consensus has always been there and it doesn't become a debate.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      222
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      92
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      86
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!