Intel Processors Overclock Database


Recommended Posts

lol, thanks :D

I was aiming for 4 GHz though :p I mean, how awesome is firing up CPU-Z to see "4000 MHz"? Or POSTing and seeing "4.0 GHz".

yeap :) . kick@ss oc feeling the same here

in the side note

either my ram or mobo reaching there limit about ~387 FSB

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...589658436

so i dont even bother going with my cpu more then 3330

since too much heat to disparate .

so i keep it @ 3.2GHZ

lol the cpu at stock is hell overpower

let alone +800 mhz :D

renmaber the old days when i had 3.2GHZ P4

anything very intesive will make the computer slow as snail ROFL

now even if the cpu hit 95~100 utilization couldn't feel any were as slow down . pure Tech ownage

can wait to oc i7 s' let the race begin shell we make another ocing thread for nahaelm cpus ;)

I overclocked my E7200 to 3GHz with ease (9.0 x 333) but when i tried leaving the voltage on AUTO and going 8.0 x 400, it booted with a missing kernal error (no idea why). I also tried 7.5 x 400 and it did the same thing so i'm wondering if my mobo isn't giving it enough voltage at 400 bus speed? This is my first time overclocking so i don't really want to mess around with things too much, i'm completely happy with 3GHz from 2.53 but i wouldn't mind hitting 3.2GHz either ;)

Awesome, I'll see if I can hit 4.0GHz with my E7200 when I get back from my trip :)

It seems like those with weeks <810 are clocking better.

I overclocked my E7200 to 3GHz with ease (9.0 x 333) but when i tried leaving the voltage on AUTO and going 8.0 x 400, it booted with a missing kernal error (no idea why). I also tried 7.5 x 400 and it did the same thing so i'm wondering if my mobo isn't giving it enough voltage at 400 bus speed? This is my first time overclocking so i don't really want to mess around with things too much, i'm completely happy with 3GHz from 2.53 but i wouldn't mind hitting 3.2GHz either ;)

Sounds like it's related to your FSB and RAM settings. So check that your RAM is receiving the correct amount of voltage for 400 MHz and checking your timings to see if they're the ones defined by the manufacturer (I usually check CPU-Z for this stuff). After that, it would be a matter of adjusting the vNB, PLL voltages, FSB Termination, etc and determining which one will help with stability.

Of course that'll require messing with things, so sounds like 333?9 is where you're at.

It seems like those with weeks <810 are clocking better.

Sounds like it's related to your FSB and RAM settings. So check that your RAM is receiving the correct amount of voltage for 400 MHz and checking your timings to see if they're the ones defined by the manufacturer (I usually check CPU-Z for this stuff). After that, it would be a matter of adjusting the vNB, PLL voltages, FSB Termination, etc and determining which one will help with stability.

Of course that'll require messing with things, so sounds like 333?9 is where you're at.

The memory timings and voltage is where i get in over my head a bit. I don't want to fry anything...below are some CPU-z screens, perhaps you guys can help me figure out if the timings are correct or not (i didn't see anything on the package when i got the memory).

27686156qj9.th.png

post-67678-1219087666_thumb.jpg

The Q9450 was cooled with a Noctua NH-U12P and my max temperatures never reached over 66C while using Prime95. I know it wasn't 8+ hours with Prime95 (only 5) but I figured it was stable enough because most of my cores were actually decrease a bit in temperature after that long.

This was my first ever personally built computer as well as overclock. I had the vcore set to 1.4 in the BIOS but idle at the desktop it is showing 1.36 in my CPU-Z screens. This was just the initial overclock as I'm not really sure what I want to increase for now. I think this is capable of hitting 3.5GHZ, but it would take more time and some advise.

My ram isn't at its rated speed (PC8500) but Gwai said don't worry about it because he said it shouldn't matter.

Decrease in temperature != stability. ;) I'll add you in, but you won't be confirmed stable.

Also, RAM rated frequency only indicates that, it's rated for that frequency. You're free to run it slower or faster if you please, neither will have a huge impact on your performance. Pushing higher RAM frequencies than the processor FSB doesn't bring real gains and ends up really just being an extra strain on your RAM and board. That and I doubt you'd hit 533 FSB with your chip. ;)

What are your timings and what are your frequencies? Just check the "Memory" tab.

Alright, when you do so just PM me and I'll make the change.

Thanks for adding to it, we haven't got very many entries...which defeats the purpose of this database (how does one tell average overclockability with two samples?). Oh well.

  • 2 weeks later...

Finally time for my entry :D

Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo E7200

Stepping / Revision: M0 6

Vcore (Idle CPU-Z): 1.328v

Method of Cooling / Make & Model: Air Cooling, Noctua NH-U12P

Make / Model of Motherboard w/ BIOS version: Gigabyte GA-P35-S3G with F3a BIOS

OS Version: XP 32

RAM Brand, Model#, Frequency & Latencies: OCZ, OCZ2P800R21G, 380MHz, 5-5-5-15

Had it stable for 8 hours ORTHOS, but I forgot to take a screenshot before I took the screenshot of the idle CPU-Z, but then I needed to put a load on my CPU again to find my CPU frequency since I have Speedstep enabled; so it has like 10 seconds on the ORTHOS timestamp.

overclockdatabasexd9.jpg

I don't seem to be able to hit 400 FSB stable with this budget motherboard.

Don't seem to be be able to find it, anyway here's the information on the sticker.

PROD. CODE: BX8057E7200

MM #: 897829

FPO/BATCH #: Q743B000

VERSION #: E37254-001

PACK DATE: 07/03/2008

EDIT: I'm pretty sure it's 743 / 000 for Week / Code.

I got the processor in Hong Kong so yeah, might have gotten an older chip.

Edited by shift.

Alright, will probably be at work so you'll probably be faster than me.

EDIT: Can't get it stable at 400FSB without going over 1.41v so I think I'm just going to leave it at 1.328v stable with 380FSB.

Edited by shift.
  • 2 months later...
No one seems to post in this thread for some reason, they all post in the "post your overclocks" thread. Guess the validation is too much for them. :p The other thread is free epeen, this requires work.

that sound reasonable ,

epeen FTW haha

Processor: Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600

Stepping: B

Vcore: 1.32V

Method of cooling: Xigmatek S1283

Make of motherboard: ASUS P5E, 2.61 American Megatrends

OS version: Windows XP x32 SP3

RAM brand: G.Skill PI 4gb (2 x 2gb) F2-6400CL4D-4GBPI-B 4.4.4.12

oc.jpg

  • 1 month later...

Processor: E8400 @ 4.05 GHz (24/7 computer - only goes off to reboot, +gaming & daily use).

Stepping: C0

Week / Code: N/A - Bought all hardware from Fry's Electronics ~6days ago, Processor doesn't come with the box.

vCore: 1.269v (idle) & same under 100% load, doesn't budge.

CPU Cooling: Cooler Master Hyper TX-2.

Motherboard: GA-EP45T-DS3R - BIO's Version: F2 (Released - 06/18/2008)

Operating System: Windows Vista SP1 Home Premium (32bit)

RAM: Patriot 1066 DDR3 PC3-8500 (2x 1GB Sticks) - Manual Set Timings: 7-7-7-20 (1:1 FSB:RAM Ratio) 2.00D Multi.

Temps under 64c, 12 hours Prime95 stable, 2-3 cycles 3DMark06)

CPU-Z Validation: http://*malware domain*/show_oc.php?id=484937

Screenshot:

post-35406-1232010425_thumb.jpg

Got you added.

Can you confirm that's the frequency your RAM is running at? The "memory" tab in CPU-Z will tell you that.

Also, for future reference, the week and code can be found on the actual processor die. Doesn't need to be read off of the box.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • FWIW StatCounter has been trash for over 25+ years! Back in the day (circa 2000 and GeoCities pre-Blogger era), it was useful to paste a number on your webpage indicating how many visitors you had. In the ensuing 25+ years, they've grown in reputation and changed their ways... but their overall consumer value has remained abysmal. Serious marketing agencies only cite StatCounter when there's literally no other sources available to support any marketing claims! They are the absolute lowest threshold serious companies use to push any sort of narrative about this-or-that happening. Besides their credibility being what it is, they are forever subject to quality issues. They're so bad that my DNS-level ad-filter prevents me from even viewing their main website! HA!
    • Microsoft had to shut down 70+ GitHub repos after getting hacked, brings back some by Aditya Tiwari The self-replicating malware campaign known as Miasma took the open-source world by storm. It was reported that almost 73 Microsoft GitHub repositories were infected by the worm and had to be temporarily shut down to determine how attackers compromised projects and stuffed password-stealing malware in the code. These GitHub repos span across different organizations, including Microsoft Azure, Azure-Samples, Microsoft, and MicrosoftDocs. The malware enabled attackers to steal passwords and credentials when compromised tools were opened in popular AI coding apps, including Claude Code, Gemini CLI, VS Code, and Cursor. The security firm Cloudsmith, malware analysis site OpenSourceMalware, and 404 Media were among the first to report the hack. For background, Miasma is a variant of the Mini Shai-Hulud worm, open-sourced by the threat group TeamPCP. It started its journey by compromising a Red Hat employee's GitHub account to attack the @redhat-cloud-services npm namespace. Earlier this month, Microsoft Threat Intelligence reported that the Miasma attackers published 32 malicious packages across more than 90 versions under the @redhat-cloud-services npm scope to steal cloud credentials. The worm didn't take long to start attacking source repos directly rather than package registries. It is known to skip the npm registry entirely for several targets and plant malicious code straight into public repos like "icflorescu/mantine-datatable." The delivery approach was designed to weaponize AI coding tools. Miasma's malicious payload embedded into projects can trigger automatic code execution when the infected repo is opened in an AI coding tool or IDE. The list of affected projects includes "durabletask", a Python package compromised by TeamPCP a month earlier to deliver an information stealer designed for Linux systems. That said, Microsoft has begun restoring some repos affected by the malware campaign, The Hacker News reports. A company spokesperson stated the following: Microsoft will continue to investigate the attack. It has notified a small number of customers who may have removed their content from the affected repos. The company will reach out to customers again through established support channels "if anything further is identified that requires customer action."
    • Why is Opera doing this notification at all? They have their own extension store. They don't have to obey anything dictated by Google. Others like Brave and Vivaldi that rely on Chrome's extension store, not so much. Firefox is entirely separate as well with its own extensions store. I honestly don't understand why entire world is just insisting on Chrome. Like, why? It's a stupid fat browser with barely any functionality. But sure, it's installed on everything by default. I don't understand how people even use web that's filled with tracking garbage and ads all over the place.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rubentuben8 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      ARaclen earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      jojodbn earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      jojodbn earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      jojodbn earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      529
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      231
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      131
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      82
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!