Sony's Big Week


Recommended Posts

I know how these things work, I've been implementing them for the majority of my life.

Good for you

I still don't think the problem is at Sony's end. If they had servers that were bouncing off the roof with traffic they would reconfigure the routes etc.

That's done automatically

I think it's more down to ISPs

If a local server can't handle the load you're redirected to another one under less stress. The route to that other server however can be slow, and yes, you can blame the ISP on that. But that takes us to the first problem again, if the local server was able to handle the load you wouldn't need to use that slow route now would you?

I'm not saying you're wrong, just saying that it might also be a problem on Home's servers. That's all we can do anyway, take a wild guess.

Again, I know how load balancing works and that wouldn't take you down a 'slow route'.

This is a fault with ISP's and traffic shaping/management - I'm 99% sure of it.

You seem to be missing my point, I already agreed with you on slow routes being the ISP's fault.

But for some reason you keep denying the possibility that the 'local' servers can be overloaded in the first place, directing you to other less stressed servers, even though their accessibility might be affected by slower connections (ISP's fault).

And please, don't bother pulling ranks again, this is the Internet, no one cares.

'pulling ranks'?

I think he means talking about how you work with the subject.

But that's not the point, people are going away from the main point of the subject, if your going to talk/bicker/argu between yourselves about how thigns are done or should be done you could atleast go to a topic that was made for it.

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=655322

Save us all a headache. :p

They should of put some of the features in home onto the XMB first. It is really stupid to make someone join another program before you can invite someone to a game. Also their beard selection still sucks. lol.

The beards really, truly do suck. That is why I have a creepy mustache LOL

I would love to know how you invite someone into a game without going into home first. Because in Warhawk you can't do it. It is something that needs to be on the XMB before they put it in home. It needs to be console wide instead of game specific.

Edited by Dirk
I would love to know how you invite someone into a game without going into home first. Because in Warhawk you can't do it. It is something that needs to be on the XMB before they put it in home. It needs to be console wide instead of game specific.

erm, send a message via XMB?

You can't send an invite to another player to join a game you are in, in every single game. That is why they need to make it like 360 so you can.

Um, in every PS3 game, I can access the in-game XMB when a friend gets online, and send a quick message to them to jump on in. Maybe not an official invite quick link to the exact game, but then again, I don't play that many online games.

Yea I'm not talking about sending them a message to get into a game. I am talking about sending them an invite to join the game or server you are in. Like I said it needs to be set up similar to the 360.

Some games you can, some you can't... I expect the newer titles will have the ability to do this.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Just pull a 4Chan and ignore the UK gov, or better troll them. It's not like they can enforce the fine across border.
    • It has NEVER been shown that all these overreaching creepy methods of surveillance have ever saved a child or prevented a terrorist attack. Not a single one. It's the kind of people like you who just wave it away as "paranoid conspiracy" that makes big tech and governments this creepy mass data hoarding entities. Not only that, 3/4 of these surveillance ideas undermine the very foundations of safe online communication because they always want to have a backdoor in everything "just in case" they might need it to... checks the notes "save the children". If you put a backdoor into encryption chain there is no encryption chain anymore. You know what encryption keeps safe? Your medical records, your online shopping and credit card during payment, your photos in the cloud, your emails, your passwords, everything. There is ZERO guarantee only the good guys will use it. And if you think police suddenly can't apprehend child abusers because of encryption, Epstein was running his entire sex trafficking ring using GMail which is not even encrypted end to end. Or to make matters even worse, USA has a **** and a good buddy of Epstein as a president. Absolutely NOTHING has been done to address it. Maxwell just got a better "hotel" room as a reward. This clearly shows how they absolutely don't really care about the children but they care about the absolute control over all of us. And you're defending them here. Good grief. On top of constant attempts to insert backdoors into encryption chain, the entire age verification nonsense is again entirely over reaching, creepy, invades everyone's privacy with premise of yet again "protecting the children" instead of demanding device makers to provide simple and powerful tools for PARENTS to control how their children use devices and what they do on them. THIS would be the way, not the stupid age verification for everyone. Imagine if government would be dictating companies how their phones work and not the company's IT department. The parents should be the IT department to their children. And for everyone excusing "they are not knowledgeable enough" buuuuuulsheat. We live in a digital age, if you have children now, you absolutely are well versed in digital everything at least to basic extent. If you're not, how do you even function in these times then? Reality is that parents are just lazy and don't want to deal with this. They want government to raise their kids because they are too busy scrolling stupid Instagram and Tiktok or some bs.
    • You could make the argument that K should not be included, but FC, the fried chicken, is not the framework, it's the product. It's the Paint in Paint.NET. A closer analogy is if KFC included the name of the deep fryer they used. HennyPennyFC.
    • Flying as the central point eh... As a massive Spyro fan who has replayed the Reignited Trilogy three times and the originals 4 times... I have some doubts, but maybe...
    • Apple is expanding Private Cloud Compute beyond its own data centers by Pradeep Viswanathan At WWDC 2026, as part of the improved Apple Intelligence capabilities, Apple today announced that it is expanding Private Cloud Compute (PCC), its privacy-focused cloud infrastructure for Apple Intelligence, beyond its own data centers for the first time. Private Cloud Compute was designed to handle Apple Intelligence requests that are too complex to run fully on-device. The PCC system does not store user data and does not allow Apple or anyone else to access user requests. Last year, Apple also expanded its Security Bounty program with rewards of up to $1 million for researchers who could find serious vulnerabilities in PCC. Until now, Apple's PCC data centers were using Apple's own silicon. As part of the expansion, Apple is working with Google and NVIDIA to run new Apple Intelligence workloads on Google Cloud systems powered by NVIDIA GPUs. Apple will be using this new infrastructure to execute more demanding AI tasks while maintaining the same privacy and security guarantees of PCC. The new implementation uses NVIDIA Confidential Computing with NVIDIA GPUs, Intel CPUs with TDX, and Google’s Titan chip. Apple says it has worked with Google to build additional protections beyond a traditional confidential computing deployment. Despite the expansion to third-party data centers, Apple claims that its core PCC requirements remain unchanged, including stateless computation, no privileged runtime access, non-targetability, and verifiable transparency. The company highlighted that it will continue to control the PCC software stack, and Apple devices will only trust PCC software that has been cryptographically approved by Apple. To take security to the next level, Apple mentioned that it is maintaining an append-only ledger of Google Cloud hardware that is part of the PCC fleet. The company claims this will help reduce the risk of supply chain attacks. In addition to AI infrastructure, Apple also worked with Google to use technologies behind the Gemini family of models to build the next generation of Apple Foundation Models to power Apple Intelligence features across on-device and cloud workloads. As expected, for more demanding AI tasks like agentic tool use and complex reasoning, Apple will rely on the expanded PCC infrastructure running on Google Cloud. The expansion of PCC on Google Cloud will gradually ramp toward the full set of protections during the summer preview period. As before, Apple will also publish binaries for public inspection, provide research tooling, and give researchers access to live PCC nodes in research mode through the Apple Security Bounty Program.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      222
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      92
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      86
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!