Is Office 2008 still horrible? [mac]


Recommended Posts

The only "problem" with Office 2007 that I'm aware some people had issues with was the ribbon interface. Actually I was one of them - I could zip around Office 2003 really quickly and just 'know' were various commands were hidden. This new ribbon comes along and I knew nothing!

However after a week of actually using it, I love it. It's a lot quicker to navigate and the menus and options are structured more logically. You start from the left and work along as your document is being created. I've found it a lot quicker than having three or four clicks just to enable something or modify the formatting.

Give it a try (think you can download a free trial from MS) and see how you get on - but give it a week or so before you judge.

The only "problem" with Office 2007 that I'm aware some people had issues with was the ribbon interface. Actually I was one of them - I could zip around Office 2003 really quickly and just 'know' were various commands were hidden. This new ribbon comes along and I knew nothing!

However after a week of actually using it, I love it. It's a lot quicker to navigate and the menus and options are structured more logically. You start from the left and work along as your document is being created. I've found it a lot quicker than having three or four clicks just to enable something or modify the formatting.

Give it a try (think you can download a free trial from MS) and see how you get on - but give it a week or so before you judge.

This is about Office 2008 for Mac. I still find it terribly slow and clunky, but i must live with it.

The only "problem" with Office 2007 that I'm aware some people had issues with was the ribbon interface. Actually I was one of them - I could zip around Office 2003 really quickly and just 'know' were various commands were hidden. This new ribbon comes along and I knew nothing!

However after a week of actually using it, I love it. It's a lot quicker to navigate and the menus and options are structured more logically. You start from the left and work along as your document is being created. I've found it a lot quicker than having three or four clicks just to enable something or modify the formatting.

Give it a try (think you can download a free trial from MS) and see how you get on - but give it a week or so before you judge.

2008 = Mac Version

Read the title

The only "problem" with Office 2007 that I'm aware some people had issues with was the ribbon interface. Actually I was one of them - I could zip around Office 2003 really quickly and just 'know' were various commands were hidden. This new ribbon comes along and I knew nothing!

However after a week of actually using it, I love it. It's a lot quicker to navigate and the menus and options are structured more logically. You start from the left and work along as your document is being created. I've found it a lot quicker than having three or four clicks just to enable something or modify the formatting.

Give it a try (think you can download a free trial from MS) and see how you get on - but give it a week or so before you judge.

Damn people! read the title! :s

Just from what I've been reading at MacRumors (I've totally given up on Office 2008 myself), the performance issues that existed at launch still exist now, and updates can fail to complete successfully. The biggest problems, like the issue with Spaces, haven't been fixed either. I certainly haven't been convinced to try it again. I'm amazed Apple still keeps it on the front page of their online store. They should be trying to wean people off of Microsoft's products if this is what we can expect from them in the future.

I don't like Office on the Mac.

And these geniuses at MS already had 2007 ready and up for a year, and couldn't reproduce a similar design on the Mac... no, they had to change all the options once again to make you lost. Even MORE.

The Ribbon interface couldn't have been ported to the Mac, we all know why. But they could have done something 90% close to it, and place the features and options in the same Tabs, with the same aspect, etc. But no.

And where the stupid hell are mathematical expressions for God's sake? I'm in science and Word and PowerPoint are pretty much worthless without these. Don't tell me about MathType, it's just a wrong solution. Opening a whole new window with a whole new interface just to type an equation, without being able to type proper shortcuts on the keyboard... whose idea was that?

Oh yeah, it's slow to start, and pretty slow to use too!

By making MS 2008, MS wasted their time and their employee's time, and consumers are losing money by buying it and are losing their time also. They had the perfect interface, they didn't even have to design anything new :|

I should almost make an Angry Microsoft Nerd video just about Office 2008 on the Mac.

Just from what I've been reading at MacRumors (I've totally given up on Office 2008 myself), the performance issues that existed at launch still exist now, and updates can fail to complete successfully. The biggest problems, like the issue with Spaces, haven't been fixed either. I certainly haven't been convinced to try it again. I'm amazed Apple still keeps it on the front page of their online store. They should be trying to wean people off of Microsoft's products if this is what we can expect from them in the future.

The Spaces issue is primarily why I gave up on 2008, as well as Excel. It looks nice, but in comparison to Office 2007, it's pretty terrible. iWork is a fair substitute (Numbers is a joke though), and the OOo 3.0 beta is pretty good, although both are lacking in Office 2007 compatibility.

2007 is great, but 2008 is such a disappointment. Apple either needs to get cracking a pro office suite or MS needs to go back to the drawing board.

Good thing i got Office 2008 for free (legally)

:|

---

On another note, when is iWork 09 out? I'm dying to see this and iLife 09 and the new improvements. Shouldn't there be an event for this? A 'One more thing' event with refreshed laptop designs and specs and iWork 09 and iLife 09 would be so freaking amazing! It could be the only real way they can apologize now that laptops have good reasons to be scheduled in October instead of September.

And yeah, a lot can be done to iWork, but globally it's a suite that works well.

I've actually never had any issues with Office 2008 at all. And with the latest patches, this continues to be the case. There was a minor issue with Spaces, but it's fixed. I use Office 2008 every single day and I love it. I tried iWork and didn't care for it.

I wonder how many people here have actually used Office 2008 for more than a day. I think that some here are saying it sucks simply because hating Microsoft is the trendy thing to do these days.

I wonder how many people here have actually used Office 2008 for more than a day. I think that some here are saying it sucks simply because hating Microsoft is the trendy thing to do these days.

Word takes 57 seconds to load here, Pages takes 25 seconds. By load I mean "I can start typing now". Scrolling through fonts is slow, it has this irritating pseudo-ribbon that doesn't do much useful, it just doesn't integrate as well as Pages. However, I use Word because it saves in .DOC by default, and it isn't as design-obsessed as Pages is. Everyday use, though, I use TextEdit because of the speed.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Just pull a 4Chan and ignore the UK gov, or better troll them. It's not like they can enforce the fine across border.
    • It has NEVER been shown that all these overreaching creepy methods of surveillance have ever saved a child or prevented a terrorist attack. Not a single one. It's the kind of people like you who just wave it away as "paranoid conspiracy" that makes big tech and governments this creepy mass data hoarding entities. Not only that, 3/4 of these surveillance ideas undermine the very foundations of safe online communication because they always want to have a backdoor in everything "just in case" they might need it to... checks the notes "save the children". If you put a backdoor into encryption chain there is no encryption chain anymore. You know what encryption keeps safe? Your medical records, your online shopping and credit card during payment, your photos in the cloud, your emails, your passwords, everything. There is ZERO guarantee only the good guys will use it. And if you think police suddenly can't apprehend child abusers because of encryption, Epstein was running his entire sex trafficking ring using GMail which is not even encrypted end to end. Or to make matters even worse, USA has a **** and a good buddy of Epstein as a president. Absolutely NOTHING has been done to address it. Maxwell just got a better "hotel" room as a reward. This clearly shows how they absolutely don't really care about the children but they care about the absolute control over all of us. And you're defending them here. Good grief. On top of constant attempts to insert backdoors into encryption chain, the entire age verification nonsense is again entirely over reaching, creepy, invades everyone's privacy with premise of yet again "protecting the children" instead of demanding device makers to provide simple and powerful tools for PARENTS to control how their children use devices and what they do on them. THIS would be the way, not the stupid age verification for everyone. Imagine if government would be dictating companies how their phones work and not the company's IT department. The parents should be the IT department to their children. And for everyone excusing "they are not knowledgeable enough" buuuuuulsheat. We live in a digital age, if you have children now, you absolutely are well versed in digital everything at least to basic extent. If you're not, how do you even function in these times then? Reality is that parents are just lazy and don't want to deal with this. They want government to raise their kids because they are too busy scrolling stupid Instagram and Tiktok or some bs.
    • You could make the argument that K should not be included, but FC, the fried chicken, is not the framework, it's the product. It's the Paint in Paint.NET. A closer analogy is if KFC included the name of the deep fryer they used. HennyPennyFC.
    • Flying as the central point eh... As a massive Spyro fan who has replayed the Reignited Trilogy three times and the originals 4 times... I have some doubts, but maybe...
    • Apple is expanding Private Cloud Compute beyond its own data centers by Pradeep Viswanathan At WWDC 2026, as part of the improved Apple Intelligence capabilities, Apple today announced that it is expanding Private Cloud Compute (PCC), its privacy-focused cloud infrastructure for Apple Intelligence, beyond its own data centers for the first time. Private Cloud Compute was designed to handle Apple Intelligence requests that are too complex to run fully on-device. The PCC system does not store user data and does not allow Apple or anyone else to access user requests. Last year, Apple also expanded its Security Bounty program with rewards of up to $1 million for researchers who could find serious vulnerabilities in PCC. Until now, Apple's PCC data centers were using Apple's own silicon. As part of the expansion, Apple is working with Google and NVIDIA to run new Apple Intelligence workloads on Google Cloud systems powered by NVIDIA GPUs. Apple will be using this new infrastructure to execute more demanding AI tasks while maintaining the same privacy and security guarantees of PCC. The new implementation uses NVIDIA Confidential Computing with NVIDIA GPUs, Intel CPUs with TDX, and Google’s Titan chip. Apple says it has worked with Google to build additional protections beyond a traditional confidential computing deployment. Despite the expansion to third-party data centers, Apple claims that its core PCC requirements remain unchanged, including stateless computation, no privileged runtime access, non-targetability, and verifiable transparency. The company highlighted that it will continue to control the PCC software stack, and Apple devices will only trust PCC software that has been cryptographically approved by Apple. To take security to the next level, Apple mentioned that it is maintaining an append-only ledger of Google Cloud hardware that is part of the PCC fleet. The company claims this will help reduce the risk of supply chain attacks. In addition to AI infrastructure, Apple also worked with Google to use technologies behind the Gemini family of models to build the next generation of Apple Foundation Models to power Apple Intelligence features across on-device and cloud workloads. As expected, for more demanding AI tasks like agentic tool use and complex reasoning, Apple will rely on the expanded PCC infrastructure running on Google Cloud. The expansion of PCC on Google Cloud will gradually ramp toward the full set of protections during the summer preview period. As before, Apple will also publish binaries for public inspection, provide research tooling, and give researchers access to live PCC nodes in research mode through the Apple Security Bounty Program.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      222
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      92
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      86
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!