Recommended Posts

That's odd. I've never seen that version number. Anyway, I searched Google for "service pack 2 v.4354". Apparently, that version number is associated with Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Server Edition. You're right though... I too couldn't find a UXTheme patcher for that version of service pack 2.

That's odd. I've never seen that version number. Anyway, I searched Google for "service pack 2 v.4354". Apparently, that version number is associated with Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Server Edition. You're right though... I too couldn't find a UXTheme patcher for that version of service pack 2.

XP x64 shares its codebase with Server 2003.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_XP_x6...nal_x64_Edition

  • 3 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...
Uhhhh.... his is trying to install/modify the uxtheme.dll. It's ok to go outside children.

This is the wrong forum. Completed Visual Styles is to only be used for, appropriately, completed visual styles. He should have posted in the general Customizing Windows XP forum. Not sure what you meant by the "OK to go outside" comment.

Not the end of the world or anything, though; a mod will eventually move it.

To the OP: Just upgrade to SP3 and download a patched UXTheme.dll for that.

To the OP: Just upgrade to SP3 and download a patched UXTheme.dll for that.

XP x64 is built on Server 2003, and is only at SP2 level at the moment. However, the OP probably has a beta version of SP2 installed. Uninstall the previous version and upgrade to final build of SP2. Regarding the matter at hand, I don't know of any UXTheme.dll hacks for XP x64.

That wasnt the ORIGINAL OS on any machine -- if it is the one that was installed when he bought it -- its pretty crappy.

XP64 originally was given out (for like $5.00) for anyone wanting to trade in their XP Pro license.

I rec'd a CD in the mail from MS - and it was right when XP64 was released (about the time that old ass computer was built I think) and it wasnt a beta and there were no v.### - so just get magicjellybeans - and figure out what your license is, and get another .iso --

or I should say it isnt an OEM -

XP x64 is built on Server 2003, and is only at SP2 level at the moment. However, the OP probably has a beta version of SP2 installed. Uninstall the previous version and upgrade to final build of SP2. Regarding the matter at hand, I don't know of any UXTheme.dll hacks for XP x64.

Really? Huh, I thought they always updated the x86 and x64 versions at the same time. Thanks for the heads-up!

Really? Huh, I thought they always updated the x86 and x64 versions at the same time. Thanks for the heads-up!

For Vista they do but XP64 and normal XP are on two different code bases. XP64 is just server 2003 with a few small modifications, so when updates come out for the server 2003 code base xp64 will also be updated.

  • 3 months later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Just pull a 4Chan and ignore the UK gov, or better troll them. It's not like they can enforce the fine across border.
    • It has NEVER been shown that all these overreaching creepy methods of surveillance have ever saved a child or prevented a terrorist attack. Not a single one. It's the kind of people like you who just wave it away as "paranoid conspiracy" that makes big tech and governments this creepy mass data hoarding entities. Not only that, 3/4 of these surveillance ideas undermine the very foundations of safe online communication because they always want to have a backdoor in everything "just in case" they might need it to... checks the notes "save the children". If you put a backdoor into encryption chain there is no encryption chain anymore. You know what encryption keeps safe? Your medical records, your online shopping and credit card during payment, your photos in the cloud, your emails, your passwords, everything. There is ZERO guarantee only the good guys will use it. And if you think police suddenly can't apprehend child abusers because of encryption, Epstein was running his entire sex trafficking ring using GMail which is not even encrypted end to end. Or to make matters even worse, USA has a **** and a good buddy of Epstein as a president. Absolutely NOTHING has been done to address it. Maxwell just got a better "hotel" room as a reward. This clearly shows how they absolutely don't really care about the children but they care about the absolute control over all of us. And you're defending them here. Good grief. On top of constant attempts to insert backdoors into encryption chain, the entire age verification nonsense is again entirely over reaching, creepy, invades everyone's privacy with premise of yet again "protecting the children" instead of demanding device makers to provide simple and powerful tools for PARENTS to control how their children use devices and what they do on them. THIS would be the way, not the stupid age verification for everyone. Imagine if government would be dictating companies how their phones work and not the company's IT department. The parents should be the IT department to their children. And for everyone excusing "they are not knowledgeable enough" buuuuuulsheat. We live in a digital age, if you have children now, you absolutely are well versed in digital everything at least to basic extent. If you're not, how do you even function in these times then? Reality is that parents are just lazy and don't want to deal with this. They want government to raise their kids because they are too busy scrolling stupid Instagram and Tiktok or some bs.
    • You could make the argument that K should not be included, but FC, the fried chicken, is not the framework, it's the product. It's the Paint in Paint.NET. A closer analogy is if KFC included the name of the deep fryer they used. HennyPennyFC.
    • Flying as the central point eh... As a massive Spyro fan who has replayed the Reignited Trilogy three times and the originals 4 times... I have some doubts, but maybe...
    • Apple is expanding Private Cloud Compute beyond its own data centers by Pradeep Viswanathan At WWDC 2026, as part of the improved Apple Intelligence capabilities, Apple today announced that it is expanding Private Cloud Compute (PCC), its privacy-focused cloud infrastructure for Apple Intelligence, beyond its own data centers for the first time. Private Cloud Compute was designed to handle Apple Intelligence requests that are too complex to run fully on-device. The PCC system does not store user data and does not allow Apple or anyone else to access user requests. Last year, Apple also expanded its Security Bounty program with rewards of up to $1 million for researchers who could find serious vulnerabilities in PCC. Until now, Apple's PCC data centers were using Apple's own silicon. As part of the expansion, Apple is working with Google and NVIDIA to run new Apple Intelligence workloads on Google Cloud systems powered by NVIDIA GPUs. Apple will be using this new infrastructure to execute more demanding AI tasks while maintaining the same privacy and security guarantees of PCC. The new implementation uses NVIDIA Confidential Computing with NVIDIA GPUs, Intel CPUs with TDX, and Google’s Titan chip. Apple says it has worked with Google to build additional protections beyond a traditional confidential computing deployment. Despite the expansion to third-party data centers, Apple claims that its core PCC requirements remain unchanged, including stateless computation, no privileged runtime access, non-targetability, and verifiable transparency. The company highlighted that it will continue to control the PCC software stack, and Apple devices will only trust PCC software that has been cryptographically approved by Apple. To take security to the next level, Apple mentioned that it is maintaining an append-only ledger of Google Cloud hardware that is part of the PCC fleet. The company claims this will help reduce the risk of supply chain attacks. In addition to AI infrastructure, Apple also worked with Google to use technologies behind the Gemini family of models to build the next generation of Apple Foundation Models to power Apple Intelligence features across on-device and cloud workloads. As expected, for more demanding AI tasks like agentic tool use and complex reasoning, Apple will rely on the expanded PCC infrastructure running on Google Cloud. The expansion of PCC on Google Cloud will gradually ramp toward the full set of protections during the summer preview period. As before, Apple will also publish binaries for public inspection, provide research tooling, and give researchers access to live PCC nodes in research mode through the Apple Security Bounty Program.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      222
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      92
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      86
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!