Lilrich Posted May 1, 2009 Share Posted May 1, 2009 I am a mac user by night and a windows user by day looking forward to this should be a marked improvement on vista :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UncleSpellbinder Posted May 1, 2009 Share Posted May 1, 2009 Then let me explain. You can verify that the hash values of the leaked iso matches the hash values of the iso posted on the Technet Subscriptions site. Then you know that you have the real deal. The official hash values can be found here.The rumors are false. The hash values of the leaked 7100 builds indeed match the official ones. But I agree that downloading software uploaded to torrent sites is risky, even when the virus scans are equivocal. Maybe it's just me then. Because I'm a freak for any leak as well. But I think when the last official build (RC) is released, Id rather it be the real deal and not a leak. Just my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobeck Posted May 1, 2009 Share Posted May 1, 2009 The rumors are false. The hash values of the leaked 7100 builds indeed match the official ones. But I agree that downloading software uploaded to torrent sites is risky, even when the virus scans are equivocal. actually that's half true...the original leaks with the matched hashes got repacked and released the same day with different hashes and infected files...at the end of the day common sense is all anyone needed to get the right one...it still amazes me tho how many folks showed up with the i can haz 7 now mindset and didn't know some of the basic principles to make sure it was legit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xJakex Posted May 1, 2009 Share Posted May 1, 2009 (edited) actually that's half true...the original leaks with the matched hashes got repacked and released the same day with different hashes and infected files...at the end of the day common sense is all anyone needed to get the right one...it still amazes me tho how many folks showed up with the i can haz 7 now mindset and didn't know some of the basic principles to make sure it was legit Well actually not all the 7100 leaks were infected, luckily mine wasn't. The bay of pirates torrent was the only known leak that was infected. All i got to say imo is that the leaked RC is the same as the RC that was released to MSDN/TechNet subscribers and public. They have the same hashes and if there would be an extension of the expiration date, it would be pointless considering that the RTM should be released before 2010, at least before the RC expires. Edited May 1, 2009 by xJakex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobeck Posted May 1, 2009 Share Posted May 1, 2009 i didn't say they were all infected...i'm saying the authentic leaks got repacked quickly into ones that were Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xJakex Posted May 1, 2009 Share Posted May 1, 2009 Oh ok. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Ba'al Posted May 1, 2009 Share Posted May 1, 2009 Stupid Microsoft. Why can't they prepare for things like this. Agreed. They've learned *nothing* from when they released the beta and the servers crashed :no: Now they're having server problems again, and it's only released for paying TechNet and Msdn customers. I don't want to know how bad it will get when they publicly release it on the 5th :pinch: I'm just glad I got it already, somehow :whistle: :pirate: Where? I'm not seeing it anywhere. :( You need to be part of the closed beta to see it. Some x64 users have reported BSOD make sure you backup your system before you install. Haven't had a single Bsod on x64. Well actually not all the 7100 leaks were infected, luckily mine wasn't. The bay of pirates torrent was the only known leak that was infected. The miniature nova one was clean... or so I heard :whistle: btw: 1111 posts :cool: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xJakex Posted May 1, 2009 Share Posted May 1, 2009 The miniature nova one was clean... or so I heard :whistle: It was one that was on the pirate one and was removed pretty quickly. It may have spread elsewhere, but yeah, the mods on the minature one do a pretty good job at removing any bad things uploaded. :cool: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gregrocker Posted May 1, 2009 Share Posted May 1, 2009 (edited) Then let me explain. You can verify that the hash values of the leaked iso matches the hash values of the iso posted on the Technet Subscriptions site. Then you know that you have the real deal. The official hash values can be found here.The rumors are false. The hash values of the leaked 7100 builds indeed match the official ones. But I agree that downloading software uploaded to torrent sites is risky, even when the virus scans are equivocal. How do I check hash from today's release against the dl I got 4/23. Can't even find the original tracker. It has the label 7100.0.090421-1700_x86fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GRC1CULFRER_EN_DVD which doesn't seem to match today's release. Edited May 1, 2009 by gregrocker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nagisan Posted May 1, 2009 Share Posted May 1, 2009 They took down the earliest 4/23 PB torrent labeled 7100.0.090421-1700_x86fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GRC1CULFRER_EN_DVD so I cannot reload the file into Utorrent to check hash. Is there another way? This label doesn't seem to match the 86b released today. http://beeblebrox.org/hashtab/ Works great in Windows 7.....lucky for me my download (from D), the ISO matched the hash reported from the official RC on MSDN, so I'm there already and virus/trojan free. :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gregrocker Posted May 1, 2009 Share Posted May 1, 2009 (edited) How do I check hash from today's release against the dl I got 4/23. Can't even find the original tracker.It has the label 7100.0.090421-1700_x86fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GRC1CULFRER_EN_DVD which doesn't seem to match today's release. http://beeblebrox.org/hashtab/Works great in Windows 7.....lucky for me my download (from D), the ISO matched the hash reported from the official RC on MSDN, so I'm there already and virus/trojan free. :p x64File Name: en_windows_7_ultimate_rc_x64_dvd_347803.iso Date Posted (UTC): 4/30/2009 6:00:41 AM SHA1: FC867FE1AB2E0A9796F9E4D155B44EA6998F4874 ISO/CRC: 58FB2BE0 x86 Name: en_windows_7_ultimate_rc_x86_dvd_349010.iso Date Posted (UTC): 4/30/2009 6:00:41 AM SHA1: 7D1F486CA569EFFFFB719CFB48355BB7BF499712 ISO/CRC: E8A1C394 :p Thanks rev23dev (for the rc hash from today's release) and mwpeck for the hash extractor, it took 2 minutes and works perfectly! Now I sleep a lot better tonight. Edited May 1, 2009 by gregrocker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atleeit Posted May 1, 2009 Share Posted May 1, 2009 wait a few more days then download it via MS using flashget ;) then i don't have to deal with upload bs :p need for my quota to reset. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+kpo6969 Subscriber¹ Posted May 1, 2009 Subscriber¹ Share Posted May 1, 2009 How do I check hash from today's release against the dl I got 4/23. Can't even find the original tracker.It has the label 7100.0.090421-1700_x86fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GRC1CULFRER_EN_DVD which doesn't seem to match today's release. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InPCHell Posted May 1, 2009 Share Posted May 1, 2009 Got a ink to that wallpaper? That is badass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
surrealvortex Posted May 1, 2009 Share Posted May 1, 2009 Can someone tell me the size in GB of the RC. Is it 2.3 GB? And is that the same size as the beta? Bcos, my elms account says Win 7 beta. I think that is the RC and has been mislabeled. But cannot be sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blunden Posted May 1, 2009 Share Posted May 1, 2009 Maybe it's just me then. Because I'm a freak for any leak as well. But I think when the last official build (RC) is released, Id rather it be the real deal and not a leak. Just my opinion. No offence but if you can't tell an infected download from an untampered one you can't really call yourself a techie and probably shouldn't be messing around with betas at all (not directing this at you). Especially in this case seems it's extremely easy to spot the infected one. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gregrocker Posted May 1, 2009 Share Posted May 1, 2009 I rely on free Spybot's right click scan on extracted torrents files. Just make sure to choose "intergrate into explorer shell option" as administrator at install. It is the only one that I've found that weeds out false positives and is unrelenting on bugs chasing them in and out of safe mode if necessary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jt3204 Posted May 3, 2009 Share Posted May 3, 2009 Got a ink to that wallpaper? That is badass. +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DSLJay Posted May 3, 2009 Share Posted May 3, 2009 Got a ink to that wallpaper? That is badass. I agree, that wallpaper looks so sweet. +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Access Denied Posted May 3, 2009 Share Posted May 3, 2009 Got a ink to that wallpaper? That is badass. +1 :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cold Blood Posted May 3, 2009 Share Posted May 3, 2009 Is this the same build that the one that leaked on the internet before? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DSLJay Posted May 3, 2009 Share Posted May 3, 2009 Is this the same build that the one that leaked on the internet before? It is the same as build 7100 that was leaked, but becareful. There is one out there in the wild that has been modified with a virus. I find the one you download direct from MS to be better then the torrent ones because it has not been modified in any way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lalalawawawa Posted May 3, 2009 Share Posted May 3, 2009 I have P4 @ 2.4GHz, a 7300GT 256MB and 1GB DDR RAM. It is enough to run Windows 7? (I skipped Vista because my system is too old (getting a new one this summer)) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Access Denied Posted May 3, 2009 Share Posted May 3, 2009 Yes. It won't be lightning fast, but more than usable and quite an enjoyment. You'll never look back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Ba'al Posted May 4, 2009 Share Posted May 4, 2009 I have P4 @ 2.4GHz, a 7300GT 256MB and 1GB DDR RAM. It is enough to run Windows 7? (I skipped Vista because my system is too old (getting a new one this summer)) Running Vista with that would be a serious pain, but you should be ok with Win7. You'll love it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts