0nyX Posted May 15, 2009 Share Posted May 15, 2009 As always when a build is leaked many people want to see some basic screenshots to check if everythig is the same. So here we go. Screens . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BGM Posted May 15, 2009 Share Posted May 15, 2009 nice, but what has changed? ta! :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uberv Posted May 15, 2009 Share Posted May 15, 2009 it seems faster to me,plus the bug with music cover art album in windows explorer folder has been solved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0nyX Posted May 15, 2009 Author Share Posted May 15, 2009 Nothing as far as i can tell but its always nice and helpful to have screens. Edit: looks like smth has change: https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...=772052&hl= Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Descartes Posted May 15, 2009 Share Posted May 15, 2009 it seems faster to me,plus the bug with music cover art album in windows explorer folder has been solved. That's great! <3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stonkwell Bogtrotter Posted May 15, 2009 Share Posted May 15, 2009 it seems faster to me,plus the bug with music cover art album in windows explorer folder has been solved. What about bug when you mouse over a .exe the icon shown is just default icon. Has that been fixed? (see below) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hdood Posted May 15, 2009 Share Posted May 15, 2009 That's been there for years, and will still be there in Windows 10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Papz Posted May 15, 2009 Share Posted May 15, 2009 (edited) <snipped> Edited May 15, 2009 by John S. Neowin is an English-only board, thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radiance_Wes Posted May 15, 2009 Share Posted May 15, 2009 What about bug when you mouse over a .exe the icon shown is just default icon. Has that been fixed? (see below) Thats been there forever, lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji@nBing Posted May 15, 2009 Share Posted May 15, 2009 What about bug when you mouse over a .exe the icon shown is just default icon. Has that been fixed? (see below) They've already said they are not going to fix that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kris Kris Posted May 15, 2009 Share Posted May 15, 2009 They've already said they are not going to fix that. What a pity! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji@nBing Posted May 15, 2009 Share Posted May 15, 2009 What a pity! Yeah, doesn't seem like it should be a lot of work... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjrambo Posted May 15, 2009 Share Posted May 15, 2009 This build is less buggy then 7100. I put my bet that RTM is going to be 7200. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Digitalfox Posted May 15, 2009 Share Posted May 15, 2009 They've already said they are not going to fix that. Why? I really want to know the reason.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee G. Veteran Posted May 15, 2009 Veteran Share Posted May 15, 2009 Why? I really want to know the reason.... Yeah, I want to know too :unsure: The icon is from the Windows 9x era. An updated icon would be an improvement, although showing the selected .exe's icon would be even better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0nyX Posted May 15, 2009 Author Share Posted May 15, 2009 Isn't there a way of changing it by replacing some dll or icon? I believe it can be done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George P Global Moderator Posted May 15, 2009 Global Moderator Share Posted May 15, 2009 If I had to guess, i'd say it's do to some old compatibility reason that they don't change it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbie Ride Posted May 15, 2009 Share Posted May 15, 2009 This build is less buggy then 7100. I put my bet that RTM is going to be 7200. I highly doubt that RTM will be 7200, if Microsoft has just compiled build 7127, it's more likely going to be in the region of 7300 - 7500, at the rate of compiled builds that Microsoft are putting out internally that figure seems more likely, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unimatrix Xero Posted May 15, 2009 Share Posted May 15, 2009 i vote 7700 for RTM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ci7 Posted May 15, 2009 Share Posted May 15, 2009 i vote for 7370.7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George P Global Moderator Posted May 15, 2009 Global Moderator Share Posted May 15, 2009 MS can bump the final number to whatever, like they did with Vista. So it could be 7700 or 7500 if they want something more round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyolc8 Posted May 15, 2009 Share Posted May 15, 2009 Leaked Windows 7 RC language packs not working on this version :( (For the language packs type into google: "windows 7 rc language packs" and the first link) I found something... on the login screen, the wallpaper no longer streched on 1920x1080 resolution, and the language button on login screen is transparent(the middle of the button). Edit: OMG wrong topic :boo: Sorry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Brian Merrill Posted May 15, 2009 Share Posted May 15, 2009 RTM will obviously be 7777 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pasty2k2 Posted May 15, 2009 Share Posted May 15, 2009 Its an artificial build number anyway haha. Its not a true representation of the amount of builds the NT kernel has had. Its the same with numbered software releases - why increase a software version without necessarily making any changes? Now wouldnt it be easier if they just had 1 version number for each build of the NT Kernel - yes it would end up meaning XP could have been build 1836 (total guess, I have no idea how many builds they did for XP), Then Vista may have taken so many builds from the first beta build 1837, all the way up to for example build 3173. Then 7 from 3174 etc. Only my opinion, but I think it would be much easier to follow one number, all the time, knowing how far youve actually come since the start. Instead of that, everyone seems to get hyped up about a number that, to be honest they will hardly ever see once its RTM. That watermark will be gone, you wont need to worry what number you are on as you are on the final product, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quillz Posted May 15, 2009 Share Posted May 15, 2009 I see no changes with this build at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts