Strike X Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 Here is the Site... http://cnbeta.com/articles/85477.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ci7 Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 FAKE!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaRkMaDnEsS Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 nice seems that some of the detail that was leacked early and was said that they are fake are became true but waiting for the rc2 to be sure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hdood Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 It's nonsense. Several of those "changes" are jokes I made in another thread, and the rest are ones other people made up. Most of these sites have no inside information at all and are no more factual than you would be if you sat down with Notepad and wrote out random things that popped into your head. People should stop believing them. Just because something is written on the internet, doesn't make it true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
y_notm Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 RE: the last bullet point. Is a.) a major overhaul and would have happened much earlier in the dev cycle. b) is absolutely false. moving to the .net framwork would 100% NOT boost performance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malisk Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 Not fake. :) Edit: OK, dunno about feature changes, but talking of build 7200 having been compiled. Build 7225 was compiled on the server side too, btw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ci7 Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 nice seems that some of the detail that was leacked early and was said that they are fake are became true no it is not . unless MS announced it . also Aero diamond /winFS is utter nonsense . MS scraped those from Longhorn(Vista) beta days Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inklin Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 Looks fake to me, something similar was posted recently that was thrown out! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeeperOfThePizza Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 I'll believe that until i see it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ci7 Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 also we arent even sure if there would be another beta-RC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plocri Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 great fake! simply because there will be no rc2... microsoft said that months ago (one beta, one rc, one final rtm) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrismaddern Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 a. It has been pretty much stated that there will not be an RC2. b. I believe .Net code has been banned from the Windows codebase for now due to a bunch of problems in early Vista (Longhorn) development. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Digitalx Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 Lol what a joke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malisk Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 Reuploading this to imgur because I'm unsure about direct linking to that source. :p http://imgur.com/ZjmGG.png It's kind of odd that it's sitting on the SP branch though, IMHO. :s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manosdoc Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 It's nonsense. Several of those "changes" are jokes I made in another thread, and the rest are ones other people made up. Most of these sites have no inside information at all and are no more factual than you would be if you sat down with Notepad and wrote out random things that popped into your head.People should stop believing them. Just because something is written on the internet, doesn't make it true. You may start believing in some filtering from the news. I told you about "RC Refresh" and some specific things, and I can say to you that also They are in the process, now these days, of deciding some critical stuff, which will determine not only the RC2 time but the release date. That much has the progress gone. Of course, I do not confirm the above image. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StandingInAlley Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 According to Paul Thurott, a new User interface was expected Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hdood Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 You may start believing in some filtering from the news.I told you about "RC Refresh" and some specific things, and I can say to you that also They are in the process, now these days, of deciding some critical stuff, which will determine not only the RC2 time but the release date. That much has the progress gone. Of course, I do not confirm the above image. Is that you, Ballmer? You posted incomprehensible nonsense in that other thread (such as "low leveling" kernel optimization being done to improve performance of codecs in WMP, when in reality they are already as optimized as they're gonna get since they offload all the work to the DirectX drivers), and you're posting nonsense in this thread. Why should anyone believe anything you say? Who are you, and what gives anything you say more credibility than random things I pull out of my ass? And no kidding you don't confirm the image, since half of it is stuff I personally made up and was so over the top that no one who knew anything about Windows and were familiar with earlier betas could possibly take it seriously. Or so I thought anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malisk Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 I wouldn't call what manosdoc said is nonsense. It actually makes perfect sense that they're now in the process of determining these dates. And yes, a "RC refresh" seems like a better word for this, as it doesn't seem to be a RC2 (build 7200 does not reside in a specific RC2 branch, it seems). I can understand if some are sloppily calling it that though and wouldn't be nitpicky enough to fault them for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToneKnee Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 According to Paul Thurott, a new User interface was expected Paul Thurott has been wrong before. When I seen the list, I knew it was fake at 'Aero Diamond', which doesn't exist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manosdoc Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 Is that you, Ballmer?You posted incomprehensible nonsense in that other thread (such as "low leveling" kernel optimization being done to improve performance of codecs in WMP, when in reality they are already as optimized as they're gonna get since they offload all the work to the DirectX drivers), and you're posting nonsense in this thread. Why should anyone believe anything you say? Who are you, and what gives anything you say more credibility than random things I pull out of my ass? And no kidding you don't confirm the image, since half of it is stuff I personally made up and was so over the top that no one who knew anything about Windows and were familiar with earlier betas could possibly take it seriously. Or so I thought anyway. You clearly cannot get it, I won't try to make school to you on kernel, WPF, or how the windows 7 driver model works ( which is way different as you Mr Sinofsky think. The most work is done by Microsoft, and only minor bits from VGA Vendors ) Clearly you should read more. Anyway above things are absolutely crap, and it doesn't need more than common sense, I did not add anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATLien_0 Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 :rolleyes: someone just looking for their 5 minutes of fame. There was not supposed to be an RC2 and if there was going to be one, im sure we would have heard/read about it earlier at a more official source Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hdood Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 I wouldn't call what manosdoc said is nonsense. It actually makes perfect sense that they're now in the process of determining these dates The point is that people should learn to be a little more critical of sources. I too can make up random things that sound reasonable, but that doesn't make them factual. People shouldn't throw all common sense out the window just because they're desperate for information about Windows 7. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
protocol7 Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 It's clearly fake. I know cos there's no mention of the OS X Emulation Layer that's been added. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gate1975mlm Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 The point is that people should learn to be a little more critical of sources. I too can make up random things that sound reasonable, but that doesn't make them factual. People shouldn't throw all common sense out the window just because they're desperate for information about Windows 7. Unless you work for Microsoft no one here really has any clue as to what Microsoft has up it sleeve for Windows 7!!! So anyone calling this info FAKE really has no idea what they are talking about!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manosdoc Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 The point is that people should learn to be a little more critical of sources. I too can make up random things that sound reasonable, but that doesn't make them factual. People shouldn't throw all common sense out the window just because they're desperate for information about Windows 7. I do not bring up desperate information. is it so hard to publish from a trusted source that they are in the process of Determining some critical technical stuff, which will determine the dates of the so called RC-Refresh ( possibly as I said from the 714x tree ) and the release date ? They're in a very good way in terms of bugfixing, only a HUGE showstopper would cancel that. Let's say we forget, what technical info I said, maybe this will help you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts