Why MS can do Natal and Nintendo/Sony won't do as well


Recommended Posts

Because Natal is MOSTLY Software based... and we all know Microsoft is the BEST with Softwares!

Nintendo's software is weak, and Sony is only a little better than Nintendo, but neither is as good Microsoft.

PS Home maybe impressive, but MS isn't pursuing something like a PS Home otherwise you would definitely see something much better than PS Home!

It turns out games are only part of the vision for the motion-sensing Xbox 360 controller that Microsoft unveiled Monday here at the E3 show.

Although Natal is initially going to be a game accessory, Microsoft is thinking about incorporating similar technology into its PC platform so computers could also have advanced gesture controls.

"These are not just the kind of experiences that you're going to see with the 360," said Phil Spencer, general manager of Microsoft Game Studios. "It's a foundational event for the company, to think about how we will evolve our platforms."

Spencer's group created a special unit to develop Natal, the code name for the device, l and games that showcase its capabilities.

During an interview at E3, he hinted that the device will cost less than $200 and offered more details about how the device will work and track multiple players at once.

Natal involves work from Microsoft's Research group and draws heavily on skeletal mapping and facial recognition technology that can identify and remember players in the room. It's also a technological cousin to the Surface tabletop computer that began appearing in stores, hotels and other commercial venues in April 2008.

The technology is mostly software and research that's gone on for years, Spencer said, responding to speculation that Microsoft is basically repackaging technology from 3DV, an Israeli 3-D camera company it recently acquired.

He also said Natal will support fast-paced action games, noting that several of the Natal demonstration games were built on the same game engine powering the combat game "Gears of War."

Here are edited excerpts of the interview:

Q: You have been working on Natal for several years now?

A: A lot of what you see in Natal is software that's been worked on at Microsoft Research for quite awhile -- things like facial recognition, voice recognition, skeletal mapping. Now it's definitely the case that not all of that technology that Research started became Natal, but there are years of research, from Ph.D. levels, that go into what you see as Project Natal. It's not just an off-the-shelf, I bought something and then everything gets labeled,

Q: So you didn't just get it from an Israeli camera company?

A: Exactly. We actually built a software platform that was what we wanted to have as content creators. And then [asked], "OK, are there hardware solutions out there that plug in?" But the amount of software and the quality of software are really the innovation in Natal.

Q: You've apparently drawn on the gesture recognition work that led to Microsoft's Surface computer.

A: I think it's very smart for people to look at Natal and think about natural user input and how it applies in front of your TV, how it might apply sitting in front of a laptop or sitting in front of a PC.

For us as a platform company, this kind of interaction is not just about how I play games. You saw in the video [demo] somebody browsing the UI using gestures, you saw somebody picking a movie, playing a movie, by interacting. These are not just the kind of experiences that you're going to see with the 360. It's a foundational event for the company, to think about how we will evolve our platforms.

Q: Did the Xbox team see the Surface demos a few years ago and think, wow, I want that at home to play games?

A: We were involved in that. As a company -- and specifically where Surface started in the consumer space -- we do a lot of technology sharing, information sharing. [There were] a lot of different inspirations for where we ended up.

Q: Should we think of Natal adding Surface capabilities to a TV?

A: The nice thing that we have is depth, which Surface has a little bit. The depth that we're able to drive really turns your whole body into something that controls what goes on on the screen. I do think there's an evolution that you can draw from something like using my stylus to what I did on Surface.

If you watch the videos you'll see the overlays we do on a skeleton and the number of points we're mapping. It's a very full skeleton mapping that we have that allows you to do things with your arms, your upper torso, your legs. It's beyond what they did with Surface or other devices but there's definitely an evolution.

Q: What about multiplayer games? How does that work? On the demos it seemed like you use voice commands to lock in a particular player.

A: We actually do a full skeletal mapping for more than one person in the scene.

Q: How many people do you map and how many can play at once?

A: It depends on fidelity and other things that you want to bring into the equation -- how many points. We feel we're going to be at the pont where we can have full-room fun experiences. It's not one person, one person's skeleton, one person's voice. We're going to have full skeletal mapping for multiple people in the room.

It's going to be fun. Because we can map your skeleton, we'll know where you are.

Q: Do players have to be in the same plane to be "seen" by the device? What if one is standing behind the other?

A: There's a lot of magic in the technology. Think -- we know what a skeleton looks like. Once we map to you, even if we lose you for a certain amount of time, we can interpolate where you are. It works very well, it's very impressive.

The software and what it's able to track and the interpolation that's able to happen are really where the magic happens. That's why I say it's really about the research that went in to develop the technology we have today.

Q: Is it going to be limited to non-graphics intensive games? I imagine there's a tax on the processor to do this stuff.

A: You will see full resolution games. The paint game and the ball game [demos] were done with the Unreal engine, the same engine "Gears of War" uses.

You will see full resolution games [but] you can imagine that in the beginning we're focused on the experience.

Q: Sony said its research found that you need the precision of a physical trigger for first-person shooting games. Is there enough precision in the skeletal mapping to precisely track the motion of a fingertip, for shooting-type games?

A: We have investigated all the game types that are important to our customers and we feel confident there are solutions there. So, yes, we've thought how you navigate, we've thought about how you might shoot, you might drive. You can go through the list of what people do with games today.

This is why we thought now is the right time to show because we've proven to ourselves that we've seen enough magic on our own that we believe in the technology that we built and these experiences. We know what customers want. They definitely have a line back to us to let us know what they want.

Q: Why didn't you show this at the spring Game Developers Conference? You seem to be speaking to game developers as much as consumers and retailers at E3?

A: What we wanted to show here was not a tech demo, not somebody walking around in a brave world shining a flashlight on a wall or something [Footnote: a sarcastic reference to Sony's motion controller demonstration on Tuesday].

We wanted people to look and see what's fun about that, not just how the camera might track something. We thought that's what E3 is about -- E3 is about entertainment, and we came here to entertain people.

Q: I speculated the device will cost around $200 after talking to [Microsoft Vice President] Shane Kim. He suggested that it will cost more than $100 because of the technology, and also agreed that "Rock Band" and "Guitar Hero: World Tour" have proved that people will pay close to $200 for console accessories. So will Natal cost around $200?

A: We're not discussing pricing. Some of it is just how will hardware and other things evolve between now and when we actually go to market. But I wouldn't get too hung up on the high end of that price range.

Q: You don't want to sell an accessory that costs more than an entry-level, $199 console.

A: We look at our lineup today -- we have the lowest price next-gen console on the market today -- and we understand that in this economic climate affordability is important. We didn't want people to have to go buy a new console for something that we think is a next-generation experience. With this device, you plug in to something you most likely already own, then you end up with a new experience.

Q: Will Natal come bundled with games?

A: We haven't figured out what we will pack in or not pack in. We will definitely have a concerted launch strategy, a lineup of games, games across multiple experiences. We think about it as a platform launch. We want to have that full lineup of games.

Q: Will it be ready to launch by next year's E3?

A: We're not going to launch until we know we have solid experiences for people that will clearly define our vision and show our vision.

Q: Will Natal technology be built into the next version of the Xbox?

A: Consumers will come to expect that functionality. That's why we want to make the investment the right way. We want to launch at the right time, with the right experiences.

This is something that, like Xbox Live, raises the bar for home entertainment.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/tech...softs_nata.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It'll do well because they'll be able to market their next console as the only console you don't need a controller to play. The controller is the biggest obstacle in attracting the kind of market the Wii has been attracting and they just one-up'd the ease of Wii controls.

-Spenser

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JediXAngel don't take this the wrong way, but you do seem a little crazy in some of your posts... It's like a massive influx of energy being splurted out all at once :laugh:

Not to be rude, but general posting "rules" is you copy the article title or something to the same nature or else it's misleading what you're posting. For all I knew before coming in here it was just some rant/opinion piece on the motion controls where as it's actually an interview!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be banned if I commented how I wanted. So I will leave it at this: I read the actual quoted content, and it was a good read. Anything else in the first post was of no use to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JediXAngel don't take this the wrong way, but you do seem a little crazy in some of your posts... It's like a massive influx of energy being splurted out all at once :laugh:

Not to be rude, but general posting "rules" is you copy the article title or something to the same nature or else it's misleading what you're posting. For all I knew before coming in here it was just some rant/opinion piece on the motion controls where as it's actually an interview!

Am I wrong here? The only reason why I believe it works with Microsoft is because MS is much BETTER at Softwares!!! Sony/Nintendo can only Dream about how to write softwares to make it happen so to them it's not possible, but with MS it's always Possible.

No It's not crazy, I believe it to be True, man!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I wrong here? The only reason why I believe it works with Microsoft is because MS is much BETTER at Softwares!!!

There's no S at the end of Software son, seriously. Please go outside once in awhile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since the Wiimote is bundled with the Wii, (and has been since it came out) it doesnt matter how good natal or Sony's motion controls are, they wont pickup mainstream support until at least the next generation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has nothing to do with Microsofts programming ability.

Nintendo can buy this company and do the same thing

http://www.gesturetek.com/3ddepth/introduction.php

Also saying that nintendo can't program? Some of there game ideas may be weird but badly programmed is not one of them.

Just look at the gesturetek website and you can see that NaTal is not something only microsoft can do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since the Wiimote is bundled with the Wii, (and has been since it came out) it doesnt matter how good natal or Sony's motion controls are, they wont pickup mainstream support until at least the next generation.

I think that's the point. I've said it before - MS releases Natal this generation so people get a taste for it and it starts getting hyped up, then they market the hell out of it with their next console and destroy the competition :D

-Spenser

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that's the point. I've said it before - MS releases Natal this generation so people get a taste for it and it starts getting hyped up, then they market the hell out of it with their next console and destroy the competition :D

-Spenser

That wont happen .

Look here

http://www.gesturetek.com/3ddepth/introduction.php

Not as unique as microsoft makes it out to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That wont happen .

Look here

http://www.gesturetek.com/3ddepth/introduction.php

Not as unique as microsoft makes it out to be.

Yes and motion control was so unique when the Wii came out with it :rolleyes:

It's completely unique to the console arena and no other consoles have that coming for them. It will do well. Microsoft is easily the smartest of the three companies, as evidenced by their quick ascent in the videogame business when they were supposed to fail. Don't underestimate them or Natal - they took the hardcore gamers from Sony, and now their gunning for Ninty's market, and if they do as well as they did against Sony, Ninty is going to have to watch out.

-Spenser

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, LOL now with MS drawing the first blood I am curious to see how Sony will respond... As far as Yesteday at E3, Sony really embrassed themselves with that wand thing and the demos that seems horrible compared to the MS presentation!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, after all Microsoft is the maker of an computer OS that's the highest acheivement software-wise, you know.

All 3 have functioning operating systems on various platforms, so that's your first argument out of the window.

Secondly, who says writing an OS is the highest achievement software-wise? Some could argue that finding ways to exploit undocumented holes is an achievement.

Anyhow, on a console, and when talking about how to interact with that console - it is NOT all about the "softwares"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont understand why everyone is laughing at JediX's statement... Much of what makes natal work is the software behind the device.

I dont know what the machine is composed of but i'm guessing it has two infrared cameras that captures up the heatmap of the surrounding idea.

Complicated algorithms will be needed to process this information quickly and accurately. It also has a microphone, but for voice recognition and background noise cancellation it also needs complicated software.

So yea, fairly basic equipment, but enhanced through the use of good software.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont understand why everyone is laughing at JediX's statement... Much of what makes natal work is the software behind the device.

I dont know what the machine is composed of but i'm guessing it has two infrared cameras that captures up the heatmap of the surrounding idea.

Complicated algorithms will be needed to process this information quickly and accurately. It also has a microphone, but for voice recognition and background noise cancellation it also needs complicated software.

So yea, fairly basic equipment, but enhanced through the use of good software.

Most of the comments I saw aroudn the web is Sony and PS3 users that are just bitter because of the revolution Microsoft is bringing.

It is all about software. hardware is just one link in the chain but most of the processing and recognition, functionality, interaction comes from software. You could have the best possible laser mouse with 10 revolutionary things but if you don't have drivers for it, it's pretty much useless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont understand why everyone is laughing at JediX's statement... Much of what makes natal work is the software behind the device.

If I remember correctly not much of it was developed by Microsoft. I think they bought out 3DV Systems this year who had the hardware and proof of concept software down. I guess it's up to Microsoft to refine it. It's a nice idea but lets give credit where it's due.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I remember correctly not much of it was developed by Microsoft. I think they bought out 3DV Systems this year who had the hardware and proof of concept software down. I guess it's up to Microsoft to refine it. It's a nice idea but lets give credit where it's due.

I never claimed that Microsoft were the ones developing the hardware or the software. I just reiterated that software was crucial to the devices success.

As Boz said, you can have the best hardware, but unless you got the right software... it aint worth ****.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That wont happen .

Look here

http://www.gesturetek.com/3ddepth/introduction.php

Not as unique as microsoft makes it out to be.

Looks about a year behind natal in terms of development. Credit where credits due, this technology Microsofts going to push out to the world is a lightyear beyond what Sony and Nintendo have out and in development for motion control. Nintendos going to have to come up with a new gimik next gen and sony would do well to try and copy microsoft and get rid of the wand..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.