penta_a Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 Many sites are talking about build 7227 which were mostly linked to this one: http://www.windows7en.com/Win7News/6146.html any confirmation?? Note: sorry if this website address is not allowed in here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomwarren Veteran Posted June 7, 2009 Veteran Share Posted June 7, 2009 Probably cause it isn't leaked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ci7 Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 Probably cause it isn't leaked. +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(Spork) Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 Probably cause it isn't leaked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ambroos Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 + It's SP branch = more bugs and not really close to RTM so I'm not interested and so are many other people. (RTM will probably be 7200. As far as I know they skipped it for now and will go back when they enter RTM) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ci7 Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 + It's SP branch = more bugs and not really close to RTM so I'm not interested and so are many other people.(RTM will probably be 7200. As far as I know they skipped it for now and will go back when they enter RTM) hmm a U-turn in # ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Livin in a box Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 No one talks about it because we don't talk about every single damn build that has 1 screenshot put up on the Internet or some sadass at home sits there and says "O, I think that leeking Win7 mite be gud ideaz so me will say it leekz 2 dayz from nowz". Only post a damned thread if the damned build actually leaks or something. Not even if a fake screenshot is posted. Not even then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 OMG another build WTF YAY ROFL..... Jesus guys. Its another build. So what? A few more bugs are fixed. Never understood the excitement over such small increments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FaiKee Posted June 8, 2009 Share Posted June 8, 2009 7227 is actually only 1 build newer than 7201..... not interested even if it leaked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToneKnee Posted June 8, 2009 Share Posted June 8, 2009 + It's SP branch = more bugs and not really close to RTM so I'm not interested and so are many other people.(RTM will probably be 7200. As far as I know they skipped it for now and will go back when they enter RTM) Indeed! :) We can speculate about the build number, but it would make sense to reserve 7200 for the actual RTM. 7000 = Beta... 7100 = RC... 7200 = RTM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Ba'al Posted June 8, 2009 Share Posted June 8, 2009 7227 is actually only 1 build newer than 7201..... not interested even if it leaked. Yes. 7225 was contemporaneous with 7200, 7226 with 7201 and 7227 with 7202 - so there will be hardly any differences at all :no: Besides that you have to be pretty daft to think they would go back to 7200 for Rtm, it simply wouldn't make any sense :no: It simply won't happen. MS already stated in their that you will have to do the same trick you had to do to upgrade a Beta build to a RC build for an RC build to Rtm build upgrade - which means that an upgrade will be possible and Rtm will therefore a higher build number (possibly 7300, who knows). If it had a lower build number (7200), it would be *impossible* to upgrade, as you can't upgrade to a lower build number. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts