[PC] Street Fighter 4 Benchmark tool released


Recommended Posts

Well, I am bloody impressed at how well my PC performed in max settings! :)

My brother was impressed as well. He might actually sell the 360 version and get the PC version!

It would have to offer more than just slightly better gfx for me to consider doing that and even then, I would just buy the PC version and keep the console version. I have doubts about Capcom's willingness to sustain the PC version with updates. Could very well turn out to be another Halo situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SF4 looks FANTASTIC. I have to get this game when it comes out xD

2x4770s in CF (non OC'd) + stock processor speed (2.83GHz as opposed to the 3.82GHz as seen in my sig)

post-250262-1245109510_thumb.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

score: 6273

Average: 57.47

Rank B with the specs you see in my sig. (everything maxed out 1280x1024)

Disable the vsync, it really killed my FPS in the first run.

boy.......that music really takes me back :)

I didn't know you could feed that behemoth nvidia geforce 9800 with just 400W. How're you able to manage your rig stably with just 400W?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hm. Not bad. Even with my weak-ish athlon x2 @ 2.82ghz it still runs really well with everything turned up and with AA.

sf4high4x2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scaramonga, how does yours not average more than mine?

Dunno? You have 8x AA set, mines is at 16x AA, maybe that? :unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SCORE: 6405

AVERAGE: 59.48FPS

OS: Windows Vista Business

CPU: Intel® Core i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz

Memory: 6134MB

Graphics Card: ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series

Display Setting: 1920x1200 60Hz 8xAA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dunno? You have 8x AA set, mines is at 16x AA, maybe that? :unsure:

No, check my post I have the full 16x Q whatever. We have the same GPU but you have an i7 and 2gb's more of memory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SCORE: 8032

AVERAGE: 93.21FPS

OS: Windows Vista Ultimate

CPU: Intel? Core2 Duo CPU E6750 @ 2.66GHz

Memory: 8190MB

Graphics Card: ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series

Display Setting: 1680x1050 60Hz 8xAA

I set every setting to its maximum and I disabled v-sync. Damn, I am impressed at the performance. I'd love to run it at a higher resolution but 1680x1050 is my monitor's native resolution. I recommend leaving v-sync enabled for smoother (and slower/normal) graphics. For some reason, disabling v-sync makes the benchmark look like it's running at 2x the normal speed. Anyway, you should disable v-sync if you want to see FPS greater than your monitor's refresh rate (e.g. 60Hz = 60FPS).

Note:> My processor is overclocked to 3.2GHz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, check my post I have the full 16x Q whatever. We have the same GPU but you have an i7 and 2gb's more of memory.

Because i7 arent much faster than Core 2 Quads clock for clock at gaming and yours is overclocked way past stock speeds.

Edit just noticed his is overclocked to 4.2ghz, odd, unless he ran at stock speed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

scaramonga: You should be getting higher FPS. According to your signature, you have a Core i7 920 OC'd to 4.2 GHz coupled with a GeForce GTX 280. Did you run the benchmark at stock speeds?

EDIT: The release date for Street Fighter IV (PC) is July 7.

Edited by Anaron
Link to comment
Share on other sites

scaramonga: You should be getting higher FPS. According to your signature, you have a Core i7 920 OC'd to 4.2 GHz coupled with a GeForce GTX 280. Did you run the benchmark at stock speeds?

EDIT: The release date for Street Fighter IV (PC) is July 7.

That's what I'm saying. Fundementally, he should have a higher FPS if he was running it at 1680x1050 while I was running it at 1920x1080.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1920x1200

8x AA

Parallel Rendering: ON

Texture Filter: 16x

Model Quality: High

Background Quality: High

Soft Shadow: Highest

Self Shadow: High

Motion Blur: High

Particles: High

So it's all settings at their maximum allowed for my system;

Untitled.png

Seems like a bit of a gimmick to release a benchmark program for a game like this, it isn't even that demanding ...

That's because only well coded games that scale so so well will have benchmark tools released for them before launch.

This game looks better than the console versions and runs amazing on a large number of systems.

benchmark.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SCORE: 5656

AVERAGE: 28.99FPS

OS: Windows XP Professional

CPU: Intel® Pentium® 4 CPU 3.00GHz

Memory: 1534MB

Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT

Display Setting: 1024x768 85Hz 2xAA

Not bad i guess, process & gfx sucks. :p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This game looks better than the console versions and runs amazing on a large number of systems.

It's a cartoon fighting game that didn't win any prices for graphics on the consoles, your point?

It would be a surprise if the game ran like poo on most systems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a cartoon fighting game that didn't win any prices for graphics on the consoles, your point?

It would be a surprise if the game ran like poo on most systems.

Doesn't matetr what kind of game it is.

End of the day a well coded game will run smooth on most systems that meet minimum requirements.

Capcom usually always deliver well coded PC ports that look and run better than the console versions.

This is a well coded port, nothing to do with it being a fighting game and Res Evil 5 on the PC will follow the exact same trend no doubt.

Quite a lot of thought and quite a lot of processing goes on in the PC version's engine: http://www.pcgameshardware.com/aid,685997/...in-detail/News/

And on top of that priority was to make sure the game runs at 60fps on the majority of hardware which it does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know, I have the 360 version, and I actually want the PC version too because it seems to run faster and .. look better, at least this bench did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if it looks and runs "meh" for you then you need a better PC.....or just play it on 360 and forget about downplaying it on the PC format because everyone else is thoroughly enjoying it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if it looks and runs "meh" for you then you need a better PC.....or just play it on 360 and forget about downplaying it on the PC format because everyone else is thoroughly enjoying it.

I suggest you click back a few pages and look at my PC and scores :laugh:

I'm not downplaying the gameplay but the graphics! The game looks mind-numbingly average with some softness added to the cartoon look, how the hell does that deserve any praise?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The graphics are Street Fighter, just more modern with DX9 shader effects which look great in motion.

Have you never played Street Fighter before.

Your post makes no sense at all. You show you get great fps yet you say it runs meh.

So which is it.

Yawn...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.