takkun Posted June 20, 2009 Share Posted June 20, 2009 any word on the x64? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feyer Posted June 20, 2009 Share Posted June 20, 2009 any word on the x64? only wait MICROSOFT.WINDOWS.SERVER.2008.R2.BUILD.7260.WIN7_RTM.X64.VHD.ENGLISH 7260.0.amd64fre.win7_rtm.090612-2110.serverenterprise_en-us_vl.serverenterprise.vhd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
funkyblue Posted June 20, 2009 Share Posted June 20, 2009 x86 please :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feyer Posted June 20, 2009 Share Posted June 20, 2009 SRV 08 R2 x86 any ver. - never will be. only x64 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FaiKee Posted June 20, 2009 Share Posted June 20, 2009 http://news.softpedia.com/news/Windows-7-U...M-114723.shtml# Build 7260 (6.1.7260.0.win7_rtm.090612 -2110) is not the RTM Build. This much is clear now that Microsoft has also produced Builds 7261 and even 7262. One very picky Softpedia reader named Nathan managed to find signs of the RC legacy in Build 7260. Apparently, converting the .VHD of 7260, which was leaked and made available for download through torrent trackers, to ISO allows access to the idwbinfo.txt in the sources folder. Here is what the specific file contains for Windows 7 Build 7260: ?[bUILDINFO], BuildArch=x86, BuildType=fre, BuildBranch=winmain_win7rc, OfficialBuild=TRUE, MainBuild=FALSE, Coverage=FALSE.? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feyer Posted June 20, 2009 Share Posted June 20, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FaiKee Posted June 20, 2009 Share Posted June 20, 2009 Big news from a most reliable & discreet source: WZOR did get the genuine 7262 two days ago, and on installation they found that MS in fact had developed the Changelog(you know, the aero-diamond thing etc.) since RC, and what happened was they passed some dummy versions for the ruskies to leak. Now WZOR is burning the lights 7x24 to figure out some story to cover up the embarrassment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
funkyblue Posted June 20, 2009 Share Posted June 20, 2009 So are they going to leak 7262 then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ambroos Posted June 20, 2009 Share Posted June 20, 2009 Big news from a most reliable & discreet source:WZOR did get the genuine 7262 two days ago, and on installation they found that MS in fact had developed the Changelog(you know, the aero-diamond thing etc.) since RC, and what happened was they passed some dummy versions for the ruskies to leak. Now WZOR is burning the lights 7x24 to figure out some story to cover up the embarrassment. Your username explains it all! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Ba'al Posted June 20, 2009 Share Posted June 20, 2009 Well it is official the newest inbound build will be 7262. VHD's will be leaked. Both x32 and x64 It would be nice to finally a 64 bit one again :cool: Let's see when (and if) it leaks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lamp Post Posted June 20, 2009 Share Posted June 20, 2009 Windows 7 x64 can't detect and use all available RAM like 4GB machine even though. There are so many rigs with this problem and under Vista x64 is all good. It's not broken... If a motherboard supports 4GB RAM, it means it cannot address more than 4GB RAM -including- hardware memory. Windows cannot use more RAM than the motherboard gives access to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluxii Media Posted June 20, 2009 Share Posted June 20, 2009 Hey look, it's now 6/20... and a lot of you thought RTM would be out on the 19th. :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DerAusgewanderte Posted June 20, 2009 Share Posted June 20, 2009 It's not broken... If a motherboard supports 4GB RAM, it means it cannot address more than 4GB RAM -including- hardware memory. Windows cannot use more RAM than the motherboard gives access to. +1, everything working perfect here. freq and memory correctly addressed on Studio XPS 435MT wth i7 920 and >4Gb RAM. It is known that Vista before SP1 reported the total amount of memory, not what it could actually address. They fixed that with SP1. "so many rigs with this problem". Give me a number please, otherwise this statement is meaningless. but back to topic: Hoping to see a 64bit > 7260 soon. Hey look, it's now 6/20... and a lot of you thought RTM would be out on the 19th. :p it certainly is quiet, I think a lot of people got confused with the statement "soon after 19th". Let's wait another couple days and the original statement is still correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antareus Posted June 20, 2009 Share Posted June 20, 2009 Windows 7 x64 can't detect and use all available RAM like 4GB machine even though. There are so many rigs with this problem and under Vista x64 is all good. Bent pins in the LGA1366 socket can cause this and are more common than they should be. Do a Google search to find out more. I buckled down and bent the one pin back into place and now its good. I had another pin bent but when I checked the pinout diagram I discovered it was ground. Second minor problem is that Windows 7 can't detect i7 CPU frequency correctly even if it's not overclocked. Same problem is with Windows Vista. Mine is detected fine in the RC. These i7 mobos are quite immature still. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wguimb Posted June 20, 2009 Share Posted June 20, 2009 I suspect WZOR has build 7262 (and maybe others) but they are afraid to leak them. Each of the RTM candidate builds (7261 thru 7264) will have additional bits of code to track back all installations to the source. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penryn Posted June 22, 2009 Share Posted June 22, 2009 can't wait till June 26 for official RTM :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atleeit Posted June 22, 2009 Share Posted June 22, 2009 I suspect WZOR has build 7262 (and maybe others) but they are afraid to leak them. Each of the RTM candidate builds (7261 thru 7264) will have additional bits of code to track back all installations to the source. they won't trace anything, when RTM gets signed off, trust me this will explode throughout the net like a cat lit on fire :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boifido Posted June 22, 2009 Share Posted June 22, 2009 (edited) I have these exclusive pictures of 7262!!! (click for full details) Edited June 22, 2009 by Boifido Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
master2k27 Posted June 22, 2009 Share Posted June 22, 2009 lol it proves it :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh Jarse Posted June 22, 2009 Share Posted June 22, 2009 This just showed up on mininova (just google!) 33 minutes ago :Windows 7 RTM x64 Build 7260 0 20090613 191222 iso Not sure if it's genuine but i'll let you guys know! EDIT Sorry, just found out it's fake. oops. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feyer Posted June 22, 2009 Share Posted June 22, 2009 7260 x64 fake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjrambo Posted June 22, 2009 Share Posted June 22, 2009 It's not broken... If a motherboard supports 4GB RAM, it means it cannot address more than 4GB RAM -including- hardware memory. Windows cannot use more RAM than the motherboard gives access to. Who is talking about addressing more then 4GB of RAM? We are talking about issue where you have 4GB installed and x64 Window 7 can use only 2.87GB. 1. Windows XP x64 Edition and Windows Vista x64 edition detects all 4gb of RAM correctly, and it's all usable. 2. Windows x64 7 does not Therefore Windows 7 is broken. Bent pins in the LGA1366 socket can cause this and are more common than they should be. Do a Google search to find out more. I buckled down and bent the one pin back into place and now its good. I had another pin bent but when I checked the pinout diagram I discovered it was ground.Mine is detected fine in the RC. These i7 mobos are quite immature still. Bent pins in the LGA1366 can cause this? WTF you are talking about. With bent pins your computer most like it wont even work. I am not talking about LGA1366 system here but other systems and memory detection problem. Speaking of frequency, apparently you have Turbo mode off and it's not overclocked. Either way Vista and Windows 7 do not detect correctly CPU frequency. X58 motherboard has nothing to do with. Windows 7 and Windows Vista can't read FSB, actually there is no FSB anymore with Intel configurations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madskl Posted June 22, 2009 Share Posted June 22, 2009 Any news on the RTM leak? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjrambo Posted June 22, 2009 Share Posted June 22, 2009 +1, everything working perfect here. freq and memory correctly addressed on Studio XPS 435MT wth i7 920 and >4Gb RAM. It is known that Vista before SP1 reported the total amount of memory, not what it could actually address. They fixed that with SP1. "so many rigs with this problem". Give me a number please, otherwise this statement is meaningless. but back to topic: Hoping to see a 64bit > 7260 soon. it certainly is quiet, I think a lot of people got confused with the statement "soon after 19th". Let's wait another couple days and the original statement is still correct. A. Check Turbo settings for your CPU, most likely is OFF B. Your CPU is not overclocked C. Not all system have this problem, but certain number of them. D. We are talking about x64 Edition. What are you referring to is 32bit Edition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Livin in a box Posted June 22, 2009 Share Posted June 22, 2009 7232 is on WZor, x64 version in VHD? EDIT: It's the wrong version...The one compiled on the 10th, not the 13th. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts