PS3 tops Metacritic


Recommended Posts

metacriticchart.jpg

PS3 has beaten out PC, Wii and Xbox 360 to finish on top of Metacritic's first annual Game Platform Power Rankings. With five games included in the top 10 for the year, PS3 titles garnered an average Metascore of 72, with only 7 percent of titles created for the console garnering a "bad" score.

In comparison, Xbox 360 which came in third behind PC, its games averaged a Metascore of 70 percent, with 11 percent scoring badly with 51 more games released for the year than PS3. Seven of these games received a "great" ranking, while 10 on PS3 received the "great" rating.

While PS3 came out on top, followed by PC and then Xbox 360 ? PSP came in fourth, followed by DS and Wii respectively.

Full thing through the link.

Via PushSquare.

Source: http://www.vg247.com/2009/12/10/ps3-tops-m...power-rankings/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too right. Most of the PS3 exclusives this year have been excellent. And 1 great game for the Wii is shocking!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm glad to see the PS3 finally being recognized. Maybe I'm still bitter over 2 years of being told I have no good games to play. But really, When you've got at least 7 Great comes coming out on your console of choice a year how can you complain? Oh yea, if your a wii owner. But come on, you've had to known what you'd be getting yourself into with the wii.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PS3 Owners?

Isn't this from the actual Metacritic score which is taken from actual reviews? not User reviews?

Not only that, but the PS3 has the 2nd fewest games on there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm, I'm happy for PS3, its my console of choice, but last I checked 72.5 > 72.0, or am I missing something?

You are missing something lol. A median score is not an average.

Look at the other columns - PS3 does better on those overall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't believe even metacritic themselves are compiling this garbage now. Mean and Median scores mean absolutely nothing, if you're going to use metacritic scores to try and determine which console is going to provide the better total gameplay for you (which is probably a pointless endeavor anyway) then the number of good titles alone is a much better metric, even better would be a list broken down by genres that you are interested in totaling average hours a player has played in that game and then taking only the top X number of hours from that list, X being the hours you can spend yearly gaming. Unless you live in some alternate reality where you are forced to play representative samples from the whole collection of games, or your local walmart throws away crates of Uncharted 2 to make room for Hannah Montana.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.