Recommended Posts

Looks pretty good, apart from the custom controls that look like they're out of Jaguar (The document view in the bottom left, is that drawing over the scrollbar?)

Being built on Cocoa is a nice change from Carbon, although that should have ideally happened a while back (Firefox for example became a Cocoa app a few years ago)

IMO the ribbon in this version looks cleaner than the Windows version, but it could use some leaning still...

Office 2008 was a pure mistake IMO not just because of its major slowness and sluggishness, but also because the Ribbon was just adding a new level of complication to the existing interface and would basically not do much. Like, you could hide it all the time. The Ribbon interface in Windows can be hidden, but on the opposite, the "hide ribbon" button is totally useless because you always need those edition tools.

It's not that ugly too... I almost like it (but I'm always comparing it to the Windows version, maybe that's why). I don't understand why there's still all those menus up there. We should just see an Apple menu, File menu and Help menu, nothing more IMO.

Now, if they're adding Outlook, a version of MSN supporting video/audio conferences and handwriting, the Ribbon interface, and they put everything in Cocoa and optimize it for Snow Leopard (a.k.a. have a native 64-bit support), they're gonna have a winning product for sure on the Mac platform. Even if they make it a little inferior to the Windows version, I won't feel like I'm totally left out in the dark with a product worth hundreds of dollars.

My next requirements would be : more Office apps on the Mac. We're missing Project, Visio, Publisher, ... and the box still costs hundreds. What's wrong with them?

I like it to be honest.

Is OneNote really necessary on Mac? Because Office for Mac already comes with some good note-taking templates. In my opinion they should just add on to the templates already in use, to make it so that you could have an entire binder, but within Office itself.

It always seemed unnecessary to have a separate application... but I dunno...

(another thing i always noticed, and hated, with OneNote was that it never actually wrote on the lines of the notebook. As in, the lines were there, but it didn't follow them... So, it's basically just like having a blank document, with some faint lines behind. Annoying as hell.. )

I think I'll be sticking with iWork.

I would but the whole export/save a copy thing annoys me. My college supports DOCX everywhere now and with it being an open standard I don't know why they couldn't put it in. I just want to set DOCX as the default file type and not have to think about it.

From a usability perspective it looks pretty well laid out, however, I wish they'd just stick with that the OS/native apps do... natively. Having "inspector" boxes works well with iWork, works well with Photoshop etc, so why can't they stick with it? :(

One thing I like about iWork, though, and it's really more because of the design of Mac OS X, is just the way I can drag in media, whether it be images, music, etc. I can drag an image into a cell in Numbers, for example, and it will be sized to fit, match all the styling and formatting, etc. I can't recall if Office 2008 worked like that.

It's just the little things about iWork that keep me using it. But if Office 2011 is a big improvement over 2008 (which I really didn't find bad at all), then I can see myself making the switch.

If there is a public beta of this, I'm so giving this a shot. I liked the Ribbon concept from Office 2007, but it didn't materialize in Office 2008 for Mac. But then again, I'm also concerned as to whether this version will be Intel only (a lot of Mac apps are moving in that direction), or will it support PPC as well.

I would but the whole export/save a copy thing annoys me. My college supports DOCX everywhere now and with it being an open standard I don't know why they couldn't put it in. I just want to set DOCX as the default file type and not have to think about it.

I think its pretty logical that Apple prefers to use its own document type, you don't see Microsoft Word saving to .pages either. Especially because advanced lay-outs will **** up either way when opening them in another application. The only thing that I find annoying is that Pages won't export to .docx. Maybe iWork '10 will fix this.

It seems more and more likely that we'll be buying Office (for PC and Mac), so I really hope 2011 is still a universal binary, it'd be annoying if it was Intel only but still supported 10.5 (My mother has a 4-5 year old iBook which I installed 10.5 on)

Well, if you're still supporting 10.5 then you should still be supporting PPC, but if the app is 10.6 only then obviously you wouldn't build a PPC version.

As for my Mother having a PPC mac, she bought it only a few months ago, she doesn't really like the current designs but really likes the old designs, she went out of her way to find and buy a 12" G4 iBook (at the same time I got a 450Mhz G4 tower for $5 :cool: ), it can run Leopard fine.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • What about it? The old MV2 version will not work.
    • Wow, this is some Iran, Cuba, China, Russia, North Korea-level citizen surveillance right there, the UK's government has gone totally mad. Power trip indeed, their politicians are totally out of control about this issue. They're starting to cross limits I wouldn't have imagined, to be honest. British people, fight this, your privacy and freedoms are in danger. Vote this government out of power.
    • Nintendo unveils The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time remake, and it's out this year by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Confirming many rumors, Nintendo officially announced a remake of the classic The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time, the very first game in the series that offered a 3D experience to fans. Unlike previous remasters and re-releases, the originally 1998-released fantasy adventure game is being remade from the ground up for the Nintendo Switch 2 console this time. "The Nintendo 64 classic returns for a new generation in 2026, reborn exclusively for Nintendo Switch 2," said the company about today's announcement. While Nintendo didn't go into much detail about the project, other than confirming its existence, we did get a small teaser trailer at the Direct presentation today. Catch the footage below: With a tapestry as the backdrop, the first half of the trailer tells the tale of Hyrule, the Kokiri forest dwellers, and their fairy companions. It goes onto introduce "one particular boy" without a fairy, which then cuts to a sleeping Link, showcasing what looks like the new art style being introduced in the remake. Unfortunately, no gameplay or a look at the world has been revealed yet. The game originally released for the Nintendo 64 back in 1998, offering a time travel adventure where Link is once again going up against the evil king Ganondorf. The hugely well-received title has only been playable on modern Nintendo consoles using the Switch Online + Expansion Pack membership. The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time remake for the Nintendo Switch 2 doesn't have a firm release date yet, but Nintendo says it will be released sometime in 2026. Considering just how many publishers are avoiding the Grand Theft Auto VI release nowadays, the company may copy that strategy and also opt to bring this out before November this year.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rubentuben8 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      ARaclen earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      jojodbn earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      jojodbn earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      jojodbn earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      516
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      229
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      117
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      87
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      83
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!